Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

CD Projekt's Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.0 + Phantom Liberty Expansion Thread

Zariusz

Liturgist
Joined
Nov 13, 2019
Messages
2,056
Location
Civitas Schinesghe
For some the feeling of wasted potential mixed with a tiny light of hope that there is a chance of improvement works like a drug. Some mediocre games can hold fans with this for years.
Others just want to sail the Panam's canal
smug.png
 
Last edited:

mediocrepoet

Philosoraptor in Residence
Patron
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
13,599
Location
Combatfag: Gold box / Pathfinder
Codex 2012 Codex+ Now Streaming! MCA Project: Eternity Divinity: Original Sin 2

gurugeorge

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Aug 3, 2019
Messages
7,910
Location
London, UK
Strap Yourselves In
It very much isn't to Cuckdexers.
Some of us called the transfer of resources from the trainwreck of Cyberpunk 2077 to a fourth game in the Witcher setting well before CDPR's announcements made it clear:
Then why are people still talking about this garbage?

You keep asking this question. It's because there's nothing like it in terms of a fully-realized cyberpunk atmosphere, and with mods it can be made reasonably okay. The big flaws can't be fixed, but things like level scaling and the junk MMO loot system and the broken build system can, so you can still have fun with it - and modders keep plugging away at it, again, because of the fact that there's nothing out there like it. If you want to soak in a cyberpunk vibe in a fully realized 3-d world with modern graphics, it's still the only and best option.

In a way I guess it's more like a wistful nostalgia for what could have been - plus the occasional heads-up about mods.
 

Kjaska

Arbeiter
Patron
Joined
Nov 23, 2015
Messages
1,594
Location
Germoney
Insert Title Here
It very much isn't to Cuckdexers.
Some of us called the transfer of resources from the trainwreck of Cyberpunk 2077 to a fourth game in the Witcher setting well before CDPR's announcements made it clear:
Then why are people still talking about this garbage?
Cuz it ain't garbage. Garbage is what my diet looks like. Cyberpunk is an artifact of ambition. A tiny glimpse of what could have been. A feeling. Just go visit the nearest Konzentrationslager and maybe you'll understand what I mean.
 

Gerrard

Arcane
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
12,867
Reminder that Mike Pondsmith is a massive weeb and he made Teenagers from Outer Space by binging the works of Rumiko Takahashi (the Ranma and Inuyasha lady), then turned it into an RPG.
Reminder that Mike Pondsmith kept shilling this trash game and never had even one issue with it.
 

|NOVVAK|

Novice
Joined
Dec 12, 2020
Messages
28
Reminder that Mike Pondsmith is a massive weeb and he made Teenagers from Outer Space by binging the works of Rumiko Takahashi (the Ranma and Inuyasha lady), then turned it into an RPG.
Reminder that Mike Pondsmith kept shilling this trash game and never had even one issue with it.
Correction - he never SAID that had even one issue with it. Which shouldn't be surprising. George R.R. Martin didn't trash GoT when he had plenty of reasons to. Sapkowski didn't trash Netflix Witcher "adaptation". Does anyone have examples of authors trashing adaptations of their work when they were released (not decades after)?
 

|NOVVAK|

Novice
Joined
Dec 12, 2020
Messages
28
Sapkowski didn't trash Netflix Witcher "adaptation". Does anyone have examples of authors trashing adaptations of their work when they were released (not decades after)?
Sapko was plenty butthurt about the games though.
Probably because he didn't get enough money from it. And wasn't involved in production. And doesn't like video games. And usually he says openly what he thinks (and still didn't trash Netflix Witcher).
 

gurugeorge

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Aug 3, 2019
Messages
7,910
Location
London, UK
Strap Yourselves In
Sapkowski didn't trash Netflix Witcher "adaptation". Does anyone have examples of authors trashing adaptations of their work when they were released (not decades after)?
Sapko was plenty butthurt about the games though.

He was butthurt because he'd made the mistake of underestimating how big games are, and had settled for a modest one-time payoff for the rights to use his work - he didn't get a proper percentage. That was a decision he regretted later, when the Witcher games blew up. It's actually quite funny :) (But I gather CDPR have treated his claim fairly enough, even though they didn't really have to, by rights they could have just lol-ed all the way to the bank :) )
 

Tyrr

Liturgist
Joined
Jun 25, 2020
Messages
2,664
Sapkowski didn't trash Netflix Witcher "adaptation". Does anyone have examples of authors trashing adaptations of their work when they were released (not decades after)?
Sapko was plenty butthurt about the games though.

He was butthurt because he'd made the mistake of underestimating how big games are, and had settled for a modest one-time payoff for the rights to use his work - he didn't get a proper percentage. That was a decision he regretted later, when the Witcher games blew up. It's actually quite funny :) (But I gather CDPR have treated his claim fairly enough, even though they didn't really have to, by rights they could have just lol-ed all the way to the bank :) )
Q0gsoL4.jpg
 
Vatnik Wumao
Joined
Oct 2, 2018
Messages
19,608
Reminder that Mike Pondsmith is a massive weeb and he made Teenagers from Outer Space by binging the works of Rumiko Takahashi (the Ranma and Inuyasha lady), then turned it into an RPG.
Reminder that Mike Pondsmith kept shilling this trash game and never had even one issue with it.
Does anyone have examples of authors trashing adaptations of their work when they were released (not decades after)?
Stephen King vis-a-vis Kubrick's adaptation of The Shining. Although he still considered it a good work on its own, but he couldn't stand the bastardization of what was one of his most personal novels.
 

Gerrard

Arcane
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
12,867
Reminder that Mike Pondsmith is a massive weeb and he made Teenagers from Outer Space by binging the works of Rumiko Takahashi (the Ranma and Inuyasha lady), then turned it into an RPG.
Reminder that Mike Pondsmith kept shilling this trash game and never had even one issue with it.
Correction - he never SAID that had even one issue with it. Which shouldn't be surprising. George R.R. Martin didn't trash GoT when he had plenty of reasons to. Sapkowski didn't trash Netflix Witcher "adaptation". Does anyone have examples of authors trashing adaptations of their work when they were released (not decades after)?
Sapkowski is a greedy bastard, he didn't have any qualms about criticizing the polish adaptations, probably because they didn't pay him to promote it. If you actually read the interviews with him (that weren't obvious promotion nonsense) about the Netflix production you'd see he didn't exactly have it in high regard either.
 
Vatnik Wumao
Joined
Oct 2, 2018
Messages
19,608
It's only an emotional response on King's part. Otherwise the guy has no issue with adaptations not remaining faithful to the source material, such as the film adaptation of The Mist whose ending King considered to be brilliant.
 

ERYFKRAD

Barbarian
Patron
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
29,892
Strap Yourselves In Serpent in the Staglands Shadorwun: Hong Kong Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
It's only an emotional response on King's part. Otherwise the guy has no issue with adaptations not remaining faithful to the source material, such as the film adaptation of The Mist whose ending King considered to be brilliant.
Shit ending though. Real fucking cheap.
 

gerey

Arcane
Zionist Agent
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
3,472
It's only an emotional response on King's part. Otherwise the guy has no issue with adaptations not remaining faithful to the source material, such as the film adaptation of The Mist whose ending King considered to be brilliant.
Shit ending though. Real fucking cheap.
Yeah, the Mist ending cheapens the whole story. It could have worked to a degree if they had waited a while to reveal the gotcha moment instead of it happening immediately afterwards.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom