Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

CD Projekt's Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.0 + Phantom Liberty Expansion Thread

Joined
Jun 6, 2010
Messages
2,291
Location
Milan, Italy
Oof, I'd expect way more from 6 years of development. At least in writing department.

First episodes were Strong, but it devolves into generic Trigger story, where everything becomes watered down Gurren Laggan.
?

It goes pretty much in the OPPOSITE direction of the typical unabashed optimism that defines most of TRIGGER's works in the past.
To the point it becomes pretty damn obvious there's a different writer at work here (which is blessing, incidentally, since they have more misses than hits on their record at this point).
 

Gradenmayer

Learned
Joined
Jul 21, 2019
Messages
612
Oof, I'd expect way more from 6 years of development. At least in writing department.

First episodes were Strong, but it devolves into generic Trigger story, where everything becomes watered down Gurren Laggan.
?

It goes pretty much in the OPPOSITE direction of the typical unabashed optimism that defines most of TRIGGER's works in the past.
To the point it becomes pretty damn obvious there's a different writer at work here (which is blessing, incidentally, since they have more misses than hits on their record at this point).
I disagree, yeah mood is darker, but It still was a typical Trigger story,
where Smasher stops the space alien chapter from happening
 

CthuluIsSpy

Arcane
Joined
Dec 26, 2014
Messages
8,259
Location
On the internet, writing shit posts.
Yeah, the final episode felt really "Trigger" to me and kind of weak.
Sure it's more bitter sweet and has some dramatic moments (but nowhere near the level of Episode 6), but that whole cyberskeleton thing really jumped the shark and really no different from their over the top giant robot ending.
I dunno, the show felt weaker after the time skip. How they covered David falling to cyberpsychosis was neat though.
 
Last edited:

ADL

Prophet
Joined
Oct 23, 2017
Messages
3,888
Location
Nantucket
All that time and effort and that's the story they ended up with? I enjoyed the show for what it was but they should have kept that '6 years of development' bit a secret. I was thinking it was solid for a 1-2 year project. 6 years makes you think "that's it?"
 

Pink Eye

Monk
Patron
Joined
Oct 10, 2019
Messages
5,797
Location
Space Refrigerator
I'm very into cock and ball torture
Wait. 6 years?! They could have made more episodes... That could have been at least two seasons right there. Your average anime production gets way less than 6 years.
 
Joined
Jun 6, 2010
Messages
2,291
Location
Milan, Italy
"6 years of development" is obviously hyperbolic retelling of what actually happened.
Even if the timespan itself was not inflated (which I doubt, anyway) it was most likely something like "4 years of getting a draft and looking around for options, Two years of planning and production".
 

CthuluIsSpy

Arcane
Joined
Dec 26, 2014
Messages
8,259
Location
On the internet, writing shit posts.
"6 years of development" is obviously hyperbolic retelling of what actually happened.
Even if the timespan itself was not inflated (which I doubt, anyway) it was most likely something like "4 years of getting a draft and looking around for options, Two years of planning and production".
Yeah, I'm sure a lot of it was planning and writing a draft, trying to work out how to use the music from the game, etc.
How much of it is hand-drawn? because that would take up time too.

Does anyone know how long it took to make Kill-La-Kill as reference?
 

lukaszek

the determinator
Patron
Joined
Jan 15, 2015
Messages
12,887
im not getting this '6 years to get it right' story, when most scenes are basically copy pasted from game
 

Perkel

Arcane
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
15,968
"6 years of development" is obviously hyperbolic retelling of what actually happened.
Even if the timespan itself was not inflated (which I doubt, anyway) it was most likely something like "4 years of getting a draft and looking around for options, Two years of planning and production".

2 years of drafting inhouse/choosing studio, getting budget and greenlighting project - CDPR side
2.5 years of preproduction - CDPR and TRIGGER
1 year of production - TRIGGER
7 months of post production - CDPR
4 months of waiting for good tv series slot in year - CDPR and NETFLIX

So yeah 6 years.
 

Grunker

RPG Codex Ghost
Patron
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
27,541
Location
Copenhagen
So after having done a lot of "gigs" despite my better judgment (quests are broken down into main, side, gig, with gig being very small/copypasta a la question marks in TW3), I think I'm seeing at least one crucial development resource issue that could play a part in why one the main reasons TW3 succeeded - the fantastic side content - is way less impressive in Cyberpunk.

Basically, despite what I said ealier, gigs are vastly better Witcher question mark content (which doesn't say much since Witcher question marks is about the worst RPG content ever made). Despite being similar in gameplay gigs have voiced, unique dialogue and surprisingly often have story beats that stretch them out into "mini side quests." You'll even find the odd bit of reactivity or callbacks to prior discoveries in earlier gigs. It must have taken a pretty significant development effort to make so many all with unique content (there are almost a hundred of these and all of them have *at least* a bit of unique dialogue).

And it's a COMPLETE waste of effort. There's almost nothing gained here compared to Witcher questionmark hell. They're still boring, copypastaed missions that I ended up stealthing through most of the time, not because I'm a stealth character, but because it was just faster. Doing them ended up being a curiosity project - I definetely wouldn't recommend anyone else do it.

I might be totally wrong a producing these were little effort compared to question marks, and if that's so, well good on them I guess. But if this ultimately non-impactful improvement in any way took resources from actual side quests, it was a horrific move in my opinion.
 

lukaszek

the determinator
Patron
Joined
Jan 15, 2015
Messages
12,887
im not getting this '6 years to get it right' story, when most scenes are basically copy pasted from game
*Copy pasted into another medium
They still have to draw it. Which means they have to copy it exactly.
havent seen the jurno vid so im relying on quotes posted in here. Im not negating pasting to another medium. Honestly I dig the new visuals.

My assumption/understanding was that they spend a lot of time trying to get atmosphere/feel of cyberpunk right. This is the part that raises my eyebrow and where copy\paste comment comes from. One thing would be throwing just a few scenes as a nod towards gaymers, but amount of locations straight from game is high.
 

Gargaune

Arcane
Joined
Mar 12, 2020
Messages
3,368
So after having done a lot of "gigs" despite my better judgment (quests are broken down into main, side, gig, with gig being very small/copypasta a la question marks in TW3), I think I'm seeing at least one crucial development resource issue that could play a part in why one the main reasons TW3 succeeded - the fantastic side content - is way less impressive in Cyberpunk.

Basically, despite what I said ealier, gigs are vastly better Witcher question mark content (which doesn't say much since Witcher question marks is about the worst RPG content ever made). Despite being similar in gameplay gigs have voiced, unique dialogue and surprisingly often have story beats that stretch them out into "mini side quests." You'll even find the odd bit of reactivity or callbacks to prior discoveries in earlier gigs. It must have taken a pretty significant development effort to make so many all with unique content (there are almost a hundred of these and all of them have *at least* a bit of unique dialogue).

And it's a COMPLETE waste of effort. There's almost nothing gained here compared to Witcher questionmark hell. They're still boring, copypastaed missions that I ended up stealthing through most of the time, not because I'm a stealth character, but because it was just faster. Doing them ended up being a curiosity project - I definetely wouldn't recommend anyone else do it.

I might be totally wrong a producing these were little effort compared to question marks, and if that's so, well good on them I guess. But if this ultimately non-impactful improvement in any way took resources from actual side quests, it was a horrific move in my opinion.
Gigs were how CDPR attempted to improve on the concept of Radiant Quests/Activities and the idea's simple - make them static setpieces instead of systemically generated, thus allowing for more bespoke writing and design, and leverage that horde of employees to make boatloads of them and compensate for the non-recurring implementation. It's also why they didn't string them along in factional quest chains, because they were meant to fill that "free entry" Activity category between Side Quests and Random Encounters (Scanner Hustles) that you could just pick up roaming around the open world.

But while it all sounds good on paper, it backfired in practice. Because, firstly, Gigs have just enough narrative framing to make them look like Side Quests but they're not long enough to play like them, and secondly, they're as accessible as Activities but they're not dynamic enough to scratch that itch. So the player perceives them as low-effort, knockoff Side Quests rather than a better class of Activities, of which they don't see any. Factor in that actual Side Quests aren't as plentiful or extensive as they were in TW3, and frustration sets in.

There is one nice thing about Gigs, though, and that's that unlike main and side quests, they're gameplay-focused - you can go in and actually play a little Cyberpunk 2077 instead of watching Panam talk about it.
 

tritosine2k

Erudite
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
1,614
So after having done a lot of "gigs" despite my better judgment (quests are broken down into main, side, gig, with gig being very small/copypasta a la question marks in TW3), I think I'm seeing at least one crucial development resource issue that could play a part in why one the main reasons TW3 succeeded - the fantastic side content - is way less impressive in Cyberpunk.

Basically, despite what I said ealier, gigs are vastly better Witcher question mark content (which doesn't say much since Witcher question marks is about the worst RPG content ever made). Despite being similar in gameplay gigs have voiced, unique dialogue and surprisingly often have story beats that stretch them out into "mini side quests." You'll even find the odd bit of reactivity or callbacks to prior discoveries in earlier gigs. It must have taken a pretty significant development effort to make so many all with unique content (there are almost a hundred of these and all of them have *at least* a bit of unique dialogue).

And it's a COMPLETE waste of effort. There's almost nothing gained here compared to Witcher questionmark hell. They're still boring, copypastaed missions that I ended up stealthing through most of the time, not because I'm a stealth character, but because it was just faster. Doing them ended up being a curiosity project - I definetely wouldn't recommend anyone else do it.

I might be totally wrong a producing these were little effort compared to question marks, and if that's so, well good on them I guess. But if this ultimately non-impactful improvement in any way took resources from actual side quests, it was a horrific move in my opinion.
It's disjointed on purpose. It was partially done by outside studio that's making their own game now.
And it's a COMPLETE waste of effort.

See above it's not just theirs.
 

Grunker

RPG Codex Ghost
Patron
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
27,541
Location
Copenhagen
One thing that I don't really understand is all the criticism about background not being present enough. Yeah you're not playing three different games and there's not that much reactivity, but compared to most RPGs where your background is just three dialogues of someone saying something racist 'cause you're an elf or whatever, I've been able to talk Corpo shop in like 70% of the conversations (with a dabbling of easier skill checks, higher payouts or whatever). There's almost so much there it directs your convos a bit too much.

It's not mindblowing or anything, just seems like a weird thing to fixate on when there's so much else in the game more worthwhile critiquing.
 
Last edited:

KVVRR

Learned
Joined
Apr 28, 2020
Messages
623
It took 6 years to make peak mediocrity? The shitty Japanese pornographic cartoons industry is fucked.

That makes it even worse, because they most likely were willing to throw more money at it than Netflix does at their shows.
Throwing more money at 2D animation won't make the product inherently better, you need people that know what they're doing and more importantly, time for them to actually work. Arcane, while being 3D, took millions to make but what allowed the team to make it as visually great as they did was that Riot gave them as much time as they needed to polish it up, which meant that they could actually use a bunch of 2D techniques on it to make it look even better.
 

bobocrunch

Educated
Joined
Dec 26, 2018
Messages
148
So after having done a lot of "gigs" despite my better judgment (quests are broken down into main, side, gig, with gig being very small/copypasta a la question marks in TW3), I think I'm seeing at least one crucial development resource issue that could play a part in why one the main reasons TW3 succeeded - the fantastic side content - is way less impressive in Cyberpunk.

Basically, despite what I said ealier, gigs are vastly better Witcher question mark content (which doesn't say much since Witcher question marks is about the worst RPG content ever made). Despite being similar in gameplay gigs have voiced, unique dialogue and surprisingly often have story beats that stretch them out into "mini side quests." You'll even find the odd bit of reactivity or callbacks to prior discoveries in earlier gigs. It must have taken a pretty significant development effort to make so many all with unique content (there are almost a hundred of these and all of them have *at least* a bit of unique dialogue).

And it's a COMPLETE waste of effort. There's almost nothing gained here compared to Witcher questionmark hell. They're still boring, copypastaed missions that I ended up stealthing through most of the time, not because I'm a stealth character, but because it was just faster. Doing them ended up being a curiosity project - I definetely wouldn't recommend anyone else do it.

I might be totally wrong a producing these were little effort compared to question marks, and if that's so, well good on them I guess. But if this ultimately non-impactful improvement in any way took resources from actual side quests, it was a horrific move in my opinion.
I'm honestly glad gigs are there and they're one of my favorite parts of the game. Them being over quick makes the short stories not drag too long or just be small 'damn...crazy...' things with varied and interesting setpieces. Their integration into the game world is surprisingly well done like you said with some callbacks, like a random vendor NPC having 2 new options of dialogue regarding a gig in the area. Just hard to beat the Cyberpunk Immersion of taking a call in the rain outside the neon gleam of a pachinko parlor, casing the area and getting in and out. It's funny that you said you stealth because it's quicker, as I often as a stealth dude just walk in with a pistol because it's quick and a different change of pace, and sometimes fits the gig's vibe.

Maybe if they cut down on the NCPD scanners around every corner wasting side quest ideas they could've fleshed out the gigs more, converting them into actual side quests or expanding the ones that are there. But as an open world Dredd simulator, I'm super happy with Cyberpunk and never got the hate.
 
Vatnik Wumao
Joined
Oct 2, 2018
Messages
18,272
Location
大同
One thing that I don't really understand is all the criticism about background not being present enough. Yeah you're not playing three different games and there's not that much reactivity, but compared to most RPGs where your background is just three dialogues of someone saying something racist 'cause you're an elf or whatever, I've been able to talk Corpo shop in like 70% of the conversations (with a dabbling of easier skill checks, higher payouts or whatever). There's almost so much there it directs your convos a bit too much.

It's not mindblowing or anything, just seems like a weird thing to fixate on when there's so much else in the game more worthwhile critiquing.
That's not the main issue that people have with lifepaths (although the fact that the dialogue is just fluff and doesn't offer any real C&C makes them quite meh, most you get from lifepaths being a token lifepath-based quest), but the fact that the main story is tailored for a street kid V. And the lifepath intros don't really portray V's adjustment to the merc life (which is particularly egregious if he had started as a corpo). I think that it would have been much better if that cutscene you get with Jackie and V starting their journey up the merc ladder had been actually expanded into a proper post-lifepath intro prologue and given enough lifepath-based reactivity as to showcase V's settling into his new life (and it would've been great to get more interactions with Jackie, naturally).
 

bobocrunch

Educated
Joined
Dec 26, 2018
Messages
148
you know what my favorite thing to do is when my brain is melting down and I'm hours away from having my body taken by me from some cyber ghost?
random gigs
they couldve added arbitrary money requirements for main quests so you have a reason to like all the Classics but then you'd bitch about that
 

Grunker

RPG Codex Ghost
Patron
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
27,541
Location
Copenhagen
I'm not saying it's amazing, I'm just saying most RPGs - even good ones - don't do that stuff much better. And I recall it being a main point of criticism here. when there is so much other stuff that works way more poorly
 
Vatnik Wumao
Joined
Oct 2, 2018
Messages
18,272
Location
大同
I'm not saying it's amazing, I'm just saying most RPGs - even good ones - don't do that stuff much better. And I recall it being a main point of criticism here. when there is so much other stuff that works way more poorly
Yeah, but it's better to remove non-critical features that you can't properly flesh out rather than retaining them as gimmicks.
 

Grunker

RPG Codex Ghost
Patron
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
27,541
Location
Copenhagen
EDIT: Turning off cross-platform saving fixed it. Why is that even enabled by default

Lol, apparantly this is still a thing and I'm near hitting (my saves and loads are exceptionally slow) even though I haven't used any crafting exploits - just crafted a ton of shit to get my crafting XP (and I'm still only level 14):

https://www.reddit.com/r/cyberpunkgame/comments/kfpwt5/psa_steampc_crossing_about_6_mb_in_your_save/

broken game is broken. Supposedly gone with 1.6 but seeing as my saving and loading is shot to shit I don't trust it. Is there a fix?
 
Last edited:

GhostCow

Balanced Gamer
Patron
Joined
Jan 2, 2020
Messages
3,999
Yeah, the final episode felt really "Trigger" to me and kind of weak.
Sure it's more bitter sweet and has some dramatic moments (but nowhere near the level of Episode 6), but that whole cyberskeleton thing really jumped the shark and really no different from their over the top giant robot ending.
I dunno, the show felt weaker after the time skip. How they covered David falling to cyberpsychosis was neat though.
Trigger didn't even write that. CDPR did. CDPR wrote all the major story beats and Trigger rewrote everything in between to make it more "anime"
 

CthuluIsSpy

Arcane
Joined
Dec 26, 2014
Messages
8,259
Location
On the internet, writing shit posts.
Yeah, the final episode felt really "Trigger" to me and kind of weak.
Sure it's more bitter sweet and has some dramatic moments (but nowhere near the level of Episode 6), but that whole cyberskeleton thing really jumped the shark and really no different from their over the top giant robot ending.
I dunno, the show felt weaker after the time skip. How they covered David falling to cyberpsychosis was neat though.
Trigger didn't even write that. CDPR did. CDPR wrote all the major story beats and Trigger rewrote everything in between to make it more "shitty Japanese pornographic cartoons"
CDPR wrote in a magic gravity defying exosuit that causes blues brothers shenanigans?
Didn't think they had it in them but ok.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom