lukaszek
the determinator
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2015
- Messages
- 13,237
hulk hogan strikes backNo but the first part is perhaps doable.
hulk hogan strikes backNo but the first part is perhaps doable.
Seven figure sum can mean a lot of things. On the low end can mean a few years of work. On the high end, they pay until the month they die.
That can be pretty scary.
still no article from Kotaku btw
2020: https://kotaku.com/multiple-women-accuse-games-writer-chris-avellone-of-se-1844135498
2021: https://kotaku.com/games-writer-chris-avellone-files-libel-lawsuit-denies-1847186019
Kotaku have more important things to write about, thank you very much:
Sorry, the what questline?How soon we forget Sawyers "pro-rape" quest line in New Vegas..
He should take these 2 clowns to trial and make an example out of them. They are even worse than those 2 hoes because these clowns made the story explode and popularize it with those articles.No but the first part is perhaps doable.force game industry that outed him into hiring him next?Chris should also go after the "game industry journalists" who spread the shit around unless they delete those articles and issue a public apology to him. Letting them walk scott free is a mistake.
I don't remember what the articles said exactly, back then, I didn't even read most of them in fact, but I'm sure they went beyond reporting the simple news of the claims. If this is the case, he should have sued them too.
I have no idea if it's too late now, though
The Gamer was the worst of them, as Sean Murray wrote that he drugged and raped countless women. I think that this is the toned-down version of the article, as the original was even crazier.
Speaking of unhinged wackjobs, Jim Sterling, that miserable fat fuck, also noted in one of his videos (don't know which one and can't be arsed finding it, but I do remember watching it) that "Like, everyone in the industry knows that Chris Avellone is a sexual predator, you guys! Seriously, he's molested dozens of women! The only reason I couldn't talk about it was that I didn't have permission to do it before! Really, honest to goodness!" Of course, he never mentioned it again, the slimy twit.
What exactly?Cucktacoo once got in touch with me about some shit that was going down.
He should take these 2 clowns to trial and make an example out of them. They are even worse than those 2 hoes because these clowns made the story explode and popularize it with those articles.No but the first part is perhaps doable.force game industry that outed him into hiring him next?Chris should also go after the "game industry journalists" who spread the shit around unless they delete those articles and issue a public apology to him. Letting them walk scott free is a mistake.
I don't remember what the articles said exactly, back then, I didn't even read most of them in fact, but I'm sure they went beyond reporting the simple news of the claims. If this is the case, he should have sued them too.
I have no idea if it's too late now, though
The Gamer was the worst of them, as Sean Murray wrote that he drugged and raped countless women. I think that this is the toned-down version of the article, as the original was even crazier.
Speaking of unhinged wackjobs, Jim Sterling, that miserable fat fuck, also noted in one of his videos (don't know which one and can't be arsed finding it, but I do remember watching it) that "Like, everyone in the industry knows that Chris Avellone is a sexual predator, you guys! Seriously, he's molested dozens of women! The only reason I couldn't talk about it was that I didn't have permission to do it before! Really, honest to goodness!" Of course, he never mentioned it again, the slimy twit.
Chris should also go after the "game industry journalists" who spread the shit around unless they delete those articles and issue a public apology to him. Letting them walk scott free is a mistake.still no article from Kotaku btw
2020: https://kotaku.com/multiple-women-accuse-games-writer-chris-avellone-of-se-1844135498
2021: https://kotaku.com/games-writer-chris-avellone-files-libel-lawsuit-denies-1847186019
Kotaku have more important things to write about, thank you very much:
It baffles me how retards will apologize when things like this happen.He isnt a chad because he apologized for nothing but any victory against SJWs feels warm and fuzzy
Tucker Carlson?I still remember that right after that big fox news guy got fired for harassing/groping women or something, a woman tried to claim another completely different higher up at fox (one of the ones who had/has his own show, also cant remember his name) groped her. He went on air and said he was addressing the allegations by having his lawyers contact her immediately with a lawsuit. She apologized and retracted the comments the next day.
The correct response is never 'im so sorry you feel that way' it's 'bitch if you dont apologize and publicly retract your statement within 24 hours im taking you to court and killing your dog, and possibly not in that order.'
Gotta love Furious Fabio.The correct response is never 'im so sorry you feel that way' it's 'bitch if you dont apologize and publicly retract your statement within 24 hours im taking you to court and killing your dog, and possibly not in that order.'
Just in case people forgot, right around at the same time this happened to Chris, some bitch accused Seven-Pesos Pedro of the same. And whereas Chris was groveling like an utterly pathetic cuckold, Irrate Ignacio issued a response similar to what you're saying (though in a more diplomatic tone).
Fast forward a couple of months, Chris ends up in court, while Enraged Enrique's accuser simply vanished into non-existence much earlier than that.
Gotta love Furious Fabio.
Yeah that's the one. He wore a bow tie when he was on CNN.Tucker Carlson?I still remember that right after that big fox news guy got fired for harassing/groping women or something, a woman tried to claim another completely different higher up at fox (one of the ones who had/has his own show, also cant remember his name) groped her. He went on air and said he was addressing the allegations by having his lawyers contact her immediately with a lawsuit. She apologized and retracted the comments the next day.
The Cook-Cook and Fiends in general, Avellone just threw Sawyer under the bus by saying something in the lines of "yeah that wasnt me guys it was all Sawyer go harrass him" and Sawyer actually stood his ground and said that rape is one of the brutal truths of war.Sorry, the what questline?How soon we forget Sawyers "pro-rape" quest line in New Vegas..
The Cook-Cook and Fiends in general, Avellone just threw Sawyer under the bus by saying something in the lines of "yeah that wasnt me guys it was all Sawyer go harrass him" and Sawyer actually stood his ground and said that rape is one of the brutal truths of war.
The Cook-Cook and Fiends in general, Avellone just threw Sawyer under the bus by saying something in the lines of "yeah that wasnt me guys it was all Sawyer go harrass him" and Sawyer actually stood his ground and said that rape is one of the brutal truths of war.
Avellone is just very literal sometimes, doesn't mean he is against using rape in fiction, just that in this case it was Sawyer and MCA really doesn't like to get attributed for things he hasn't done, good or bad
Fallout 2 had rape (sort of, not so consensual, blackmail type).The Cook-Cook and Fiends in general, Avellone just threw Sawyer under the bus by saying something in the lines of "yeah that wasnt me guys it was all Sawyer go harrass him" and Sawyer actually stood his ground and said that rape is one of the brutal truths of war.Sorry, the what questline?How soon we forget Sawyers "pro-rape" quest line in New Vegas..
Avellone is just very literal sometimes, doesn't mean he is against using rape in fiction, just that in this case it was Sawyer and MCA really doesn't like to get attributed for things he hasn't done, good or bad
To me, a 2-3 sentence character that is summarized a rapist and abuser as a character concept strikes me as shallow and thoughtless, both in action or by not reflecting on the design approach itself. Not only is the subject matter offensive, the brevity on the character’s "defining traits" makes it more offensive.
Obviously, you're welcome to disagree - please do. But I won’t defend any decisions in the present or even ones I’ve made in the past regarding similar subjects, especially decisions 20+ years and 20+ games (I think?) in the past except that I realized what garbage those decisions were, how shitty they are to people who have suffered the same, and resolved not to do them again.
If others do want to defend them – and have – in the context of creating a more realistic setting... I'm not going to censor you, but I won't defend you. It’s especially difficult for me to defend when I’ve known loved ones who’ve suffered those incidents and know how using them casually and thoughtlessly can be painful, especially in a medium designed to entertain.