Yeah, decadence is a shit mechanic. They should have it tied to bad/good traits and had high levels of decadence result in poorer relations with vassals (resulting in faction wars) instead of some random doomstack appearing out of thin air.
I hope someone creates a mod for Buddhist Mongols.
Lux Invicta has Indo-Hellenic Buddhists (and Hindu-Buddhists).
Churches give you more troops than cities do, and are much less likely to cause trouble than feudal vassals.Someone explain Church to me? overall church vassals are shit IMO. There's really no reason to build 2 churches in a single county at all. They pay very little tax - and the amount of loyalty measuring vs Rome which is binary as fuck (71 v 72 - you lose! NO TAX NO LEVY)
Someone explain Church to me? overall church vassals are shit IMO. There's really no reason to build 2 churches in a single county at all. They pay very little tax - and the amount of loyalty measuring vs Rome which is binary as fuck (71 v 72 - you lose! NO TAX NO LEVY)
Soo....after Old Gods DLC ... Holy Orders?
Playing as an Andalusian Muslim is challenging especially if you've started as a one county ruler. The Jimena kingdoms + France are out to rape you and you could have the misfortune of having pope call the second crusade on your ass. Genoa and Pisa also tends to attack when you're weakened. Your retinues are completely ass compared to the heavy cavalry of Christians, so you need terrain, numerical AND martial advantage over your foes. The Almoravids, instead of being much help, is either embroiled in internal warfare, interferes in Iberia or bitten off by the republics. Your only real hope is allying with the Fatimids and woe betide you if they can't spare any of their doomstacks to help you.Playing as a North African is really frustrating. Even with pretty good tech and armies, all the Republics across the sea just throw money and troops at you. In fact, what the fuck? Are Republics completely overpowered? They have hordes of heavy cavalry/infantry. Just nonstop shit. And they can own ports on land that I own apparently? I don't know. They're fucking annoying as hell, though. I find it extremely hard to get anywhere after absorbing the whole central North African area. Just waiting for the European doomstacks to come and put me out of my misery. (Now I see why Genoa owns Africa 90% of the time...) I just don't know how to counter European forces. Mercenary horse arches help a lot, but before they arrived I was just getting buttfucked every which way; I even had a battle of 15k vs 15k. I was defending in mountains, I had a leader who was a holy warrior, two other generals were flankers/defenders. Huge bonuses all around. Still got thoroughly trounced.
Weird game, though. Denmark took England and the whole Latvian/Lithuanian area -- they were really huge for a while, but then lost almost everything. Volga-Bulgaria dominates all of Russia. Poland absorbed Hungary. Georgia is very strong and, for some reason, has land just outside Constantinople. Germany cut into France. Fatimids were extremely strong until I dragged them and every Arab nation into a holy war that ended in a stalemate. Now both the Byzantines and Levant are completely balkanized. Spain, too, until a religious war breaks out, of course. Somehow the Emirate on Sicily still lives. I don't know how, because he basically has and does nothing, but the guy is completely surrounded by ultrastacks of Christian crusaders.
This. The 1205 start date is so much different than the boring usual 1066. My personal favourite is Trebizond. You start with a titular king title, ALL your counties are on sea so more money for you and you own 100% of the kingdom, fits the despot title perfectly. And finally there is warfare in anatolia where EVERY province is mountaint+river, good luck attacking those!anyways, for interesting games, i highly recommend Latin Empire just after they formed - I'm having a blast.
Dead babies are only a tiny part of all the Unfortunate Accidents that go around.I am surprised and disappointed at the lack of dead baby jokes coming from CK2 fanbase.
Yea, it'd be excellent for the whole emergent larp aspect if the barely in his teens grandson of the old king gets bailed out of the vassal gangrape by daddy's old warhorse bro-for-life Duke MacBadass. It'd be nice if they expanded on the rival dynasty system from Republics to cover other kinds of states as well, and had actual allied houses included as well.The vassal loyalty is botched anyway, no matter much loved his father is, the son is always faced by a bunch of cynical vassal when he rises to the throne. I know short reigns casts doubt on this new ruler - but really, a 100 loyalty vassal turning into below 50? That's not right.