Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Incline Colony Ship RELEASE THREAD

Serus

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Jul 16, 2005
Messages
6,908
Location
Small but great planet of Potatohole
The learning by doing system was supposed to circumvent AoD's problem of saving up points, waiting until you know what you need to invest them in, and then ruthlessly minmax to get through the game.
Tbh I found this aspect to be part of the fun, especially on later playthroughs. It didn't need fixing.
Or you could just make so that you have to invest all points the moment you get them. You know like most(?) games do.
Terrible idea considering AoD doesn't really let you know which skills you need at which point, you have to enter the actual dialog windows to know what you need and then spec accordingly.
No you don't "need" it. That's nonsense. You only perceive it that way. If you invested "poorly" and can't pass a check then it means it works as it should be. That what the true C&C in roleplaying game is. It is normal. In the meantime, You invested in something else instead and it will pay off eventually if the skill you choose made sense. What's more, in a well designed game logical (and/or roleplay) choices will be awarded while stupid ones won't. Which means if you play well you will pass most tests that you should according to you rp choices. Those are the basics of rpg and I feel really silly to have to explain it to You of all people.
 

JarlFrank

I like Thief THIS much
Patron
Joined
Jan 4, 2007
Messages
34,332
Location
KA.DINGIR.RA.KI
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
You invested in something else instead and it will pay off eventually if the skill you choose made sense.
But there's the problem with AoD's rigid design: it often doesn't. Sometimes you think a skill might make sense for a certain profession but it never comes up, not even once (see: lockpicking for assassins because you might assume there'd be some assassination jobs where you have to infiltrate a place stealthily; never gets used). You either correctly predict the handful of options the devs give you, or you're screwed.
 

Beans00

Erudite
Possibly Retarded
Joined
Aug 27, 2008
Messages
1,699
No you don't "need" it. That's nonsense. You only perceive it that way. If you invested "poorly" and can't pass a check then it means it works as it should be. That what the true C&C in roleplaying game is. It is normal. In the meantime, You invested in something else instead and it will pay off eventually if the skill you choose made sense. What's more, in a well designed game logical (and/or roleplay) choices will be awarded while stupid ones won't. Which means if you play well you will pass most tests that you should according to you rp choices. Those are the basics of rpg and I feel really silly to have to explain it to You of all people.


Except the game railroads you down paths and 'missions' you can't get out escape. So the only option in some cases is either reload a much earlier save or start over because 'reasons'. Or of course have points hoarded and allocate them as needed(this is how I played the game being honest).


If this was good design the games would have sold better. Simple.
 

Nikanuur

Arbiter
Patron
Joined
Mar 1, 2021
Messages
1,747
Location
Ngranek
Except the game railroads you down paths and 'missions' you can't get out escape. So the only option in some cases is either reload a much earlier save or start over because 'reasons'. Or of course have points hoarded and allocate them as needed(this is how I played the game being honest).
If this was good design the games would have sold better. Simple.
Yeah, and it is of no consequence if one does what the game told him to do in the beginning. Or what one should be doing in any other RPG, for that matter. Specializing.
Many of us passed most or all the checks because of that. We play RPGs, we know we should be doing that.
So, back to the beginning.
 

Beans00

Erudite
Possibly Retarded
Joined
Aug 27, 2008
Messages
1,699
Except the game railroads you down paths and 'missions' you can't get out escape. So the only option in some cases is either reload a much earlier save or start over because 'reasons'. Or of course have points hoarded and allocate them as needed(this is how I played the game being honest).
If this was good design the games would have sold better. Simple.
Yeah, and it is of no consequence if one does what the game told him to do in the beginning. Or what one should be doing in any other RPG, for that matter. Specializing.
Many of us passed most or all the checks because of that. We play RPGs, we know we should be doing that.
So, back to the beginning.


I'm not sure if I would call being forced to do 4 fights in a row of increasing difficulty, with no warning this would be a point of no return with no way out 'specializing'.

I call it poor design.
 

Nikanuur

Arbiter
Patron
Joined
Mar 1, 2021
Messages
1,747
Location
Ngranek
I'm not sure if I would call being forced to do 4 fights in a row of increasing difficulty, with no warning this would be a point of no return with no way out 'specializing'.
I call it poor design.
Well, I call you poor at RPGs then. And as such you judging them is of no consequence.
I love to use that word.
Anyway, this is all because no matter how much more you try to dodge the topic, there are many people who have no problem with what you are getting at. Just because they know what specializing is.
Go figure.
 

Beans00

Erudite
Possibly Retarded
Joined
Aug 27, 2008
Messages
1,699
I'm not sure if I would call being forced to do 4 fights in a row of increasing difficulty, with no warning this would be a point of no return with no way out 'specializing'.
I call it poor design.
Well, I call you poor at RPGs then. And as such you judging them is of no consequence.
I love to use that word.
Anyway, this is all because no matter how much more you try to dodge the topic, there are many people who have no problem with what you are getting at. Just because they know what specializing is.
Go figure.

Well I beat the game so clearly I didn't have that much trouble lol. Regardless of that I didn't appreciate getting stuck in railroaded quest trees and having to reload once or twice.

Also you and other ITS fans keep saying 'well I didn't have a problem with it so the design was perfect'. If you liked the game fair enough w/e to each their own. Again I didn't necessarily dislike AOD, but it could have been much better. People who like to play games like to have player agency. All the best RPG's or open world games give you a sense of player agency.

AOD will have a small following, but even on this site its fans are tiny in number compared to pretty much ever major rpg big budget or small budget.
 

TheDarkUrge

Educated
Joined
Aug 21, 2023
Messages
228
No you don't "need" it. That's nonsense. You only perceive it that way. If you invested "poorly" and can't pass a check then it means it works as it should be. That what the true C&C in roleplaying game is. It is normal. In the meantime, You invested in something else instead and it will pay off eventually if the skill you choose made sense. What's more, in a well designed game logical (and/or roleplay) choices will be awarded while stupid ones won't. Which means if you play well you will pass most tests that you should according to you rp choices. Those are the basics of rpg and I feel really silly to have to explain it to You of all people.


Except the game railroads you down paths and 'missions' you can't get out escape. So the only option in some cases is either reload a much earlier save or start over because 'reasons'. Or of course have points hoarded and allocate them as needed(this is how I played the game being honest).


If this was good design the games would have sold better. Simple.
There's console commands to add skill points

Anyway going to try the new patches and do a new playthrough of this game.
 

TheDarkUrge

Educated
Joined
Aug 21, 2023
Messages
228
I don't think that Patreon would work at all. As for KS, it gives you a bit of money and then you start looking for a publisher. It's not something we're interested in.
Well that's a shame. Not even for an age of decadence remaster?

I liked AoD and Colony Ship quite a bit so will be sad to not get any more CRPGs.
Good luck for whatever else you might do. :salute:
 

Hellraiser

Arcane
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
11,773
Location
Danzig, Potato-Hitman Commonwealth
Is this well-polished yet or does it need more time?
Depends, regarding UI and QoL stuff someone who had issues with that and played after the patches improving those areas would need to chime in.

As for bugs I had just 1 on release that I still remember, and this was during my second playthrough (both just after release), I managed to stealth kill an NPC in a quest and then be able to still talk to him and finish the same quest the talker way with also those exp/loot rewards from the second path. It was pretty stable on a technical level.
 
Last edited:

thesecret1

Arcane
Joined
Jun 30, 2019
Messages
6,634
The most annoying bug I had was that when you drag&dropped a loaded gun from loot window to your inventory, it wouldn't stay where you put it, but instead autosort itself. Worse yet, it took a seemingly random item from your inventory and placed THAT wherever it was you wanted to move the original item to. Not sure how it wasn't caught by now, but not gamebreaking in any way
 

Lhynn

Arcane
Joined
Aug 28, 2013
Messages
9,951
Noooo, how come i cant pass a skill check? Never had this problem in pillars of mediocrity or baldurs gay 3. Colony ship bad.
BG3 does checks well, especially in the honor mode, where you have to live with failures and there are almost none that are game over, but most are meaningful.
 

Lhynn

Arcane
Joined
Aug 28, 2013
Messages
9,951
They can change how a quest progresses or ends, cost the life of npcs or make them leave, fail to keep party members around, get pets for the camp.

All failures mean something in the game changes. Like for example if you fail a persuasion check you may have to kill 2 tieflings holding a gith hostage, then you have to fight them to free her. If they survive the encounter you can find them again later at certain points in the story.

Some failures may cost you skills, like for instance, theres a book of necromancy that can grant you speak with the dead at will, and offers a quest later on to finish reading it, but if you fail you wont get the skills, or may even get cursed (Cant remember as I never got there in my honor run, where it was pretty much guaranteed I wasnt succeeding the hard checks.

You may get some npcs to help you, or to stand down, and a lot can come back later if they survived. Its absurd the lenght to which larian went to validate player choice and player fuck ups.

It really feels like people that dont like the game simply havent played it. Which, fair, theres shit I dont like in it too. But it is one of the best rpgs ever made, better than even fallout when it comes to the ability to interact with the world as if a DM was there and adapted to your choices.
 

Lhynn

Arcane
Joined
Aug 28, 2013
Messages
9,951
Im probably not even doing the scope of choices and checks justice by the way, its late and im tired. But the sheer amount of potential for experimentation is staggering.
 

TheDarkUrge

Educated
Joined
Aug 21, 2023
Messages
228
They can change how a quest progresses or ends, cost the life of npcs or make them leave, fail to keep party members around, get pets for the camp.

All failures mean something in the game changes. Like for example if you fail a persuasion check you may have to kill 2 tieflings holding a gith hostage, then you have to fight them to free her. If they survive the encounter you can find them again later at certain points in the story.

Some failures may cost you skills, like for instance, theres a book of necromancy that can grant you speak with the dead at will, and offers a quest later on to finish reading it, but if you fail you wont get the skills, or may even get cursed (Cant remember as I never got there in my honor run, where it was pretty much guaranteed I wasnt succeeding the hard checks.

You may get some npcs to help you, or to stand down, and a lot can come back later if they survived. Its absurd the lenght to which larian went to validate player choice and player fuck ups.

It really feels like people that dont like the game simply havent played it. Which, fair, theres shit I dont like in it too. But it is one of the best rpgs ever made, better than even fallout when it comes to the ability to interact with the world as if a DM was there and adapted to your choices.
Yeah Larian did a good job in the first act which was a 10/10 in terms of choices and consequences. But the final act was at best a 6/10, and it was clear they didn't actually finish the main story. Upper baldurs gate was completely removed and the story narrative ended up being just a mess, just like DOS2's final act. Anyone with a brain can tell that the final boss area was quickly hobbled together with spammed enemies. It's a shame that they had to rewrite the plot, from what I've read about the previous version it was way more interesting and thought out.
 

Hellraiser

Arcane
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
11,773
Location
Danzig, Potato-Hitman Commonwealth
I personally blame early access on front-loaded content/quality in both cases. Wasteland 2 California is another example (although i think it had a backer beta rather than steam early acces, might be wrong here, only played it after release).

In the olden days QA played parts of the game outside of sequence and you didn't give a shit they had a disjointed experience. If you outsource QA to players and also rely on revenue from EA rather than other funding you will end up pleasing the EA players too much, otherwise they will bitch or you won't get money. This just funnels effort into the early parts of the game, regardless how optimal that is from dev resource allocation or technical risk management point of view. And at some point the revenue stream dries up and you need to finish the game.

EA just doesn't work as far as consistent quality goes for non-sandbox story-driven titles like RPGs. Your rimworlds, factorios, ONIs, KSPs etc. will not see this problem because you are not adding parts of the storyline in sequence but rather whole mechanics/systems in content updates, and you can introduce them in the optimal (from the development perspective) order without players bitching. Hell even something like Subnautica, which I enjoy greatly, has a rather underwhelming final area. And Subnautica: Below Zero, where I did play it through the whole EA period, was even worse with this as it was plainly visible only the starting area was done with effort, rest half-assed.
 
Last edited:

The Wall

Dumbfuck!
Dumbfuck Zionist Agent
Joined
Jul 19, 2017
Messages
3,695
Location
SERPGIA
EA just doesn't work as far as consistent quality goes for non-sandbox story-driven titles like RPGs.
Noone stopped Larian from making rest of the game fleshed out except Larian. I finished law school, and know how much lawyers charge per hour. I refuse to be someone's free lawyer. Don't know why gamers love doing that

Plenty of games in EA didn't suffer from front-loaded problem. Like Age of Decadence, for small example. Lazy Devs are root cause, Early Access is simply an excuse
 

*-*/\--/\~

Cipher
Joined
Jul 10, 2014
Messages
970
A true CRPG fan understands there are many types of arseholes. Miltiades is a different sort of arsehole than Feng, for example, but both are liars who want you to kill people for them. Although... is Miltiades a liar if he genuinely believes his insanity?


ITS produces the most diverse cast of arseholes you'll find in any game. We need ITS, Long live branching stories and multiple factions, Long live turn based combat, Long live arseholes!
18dfd0de1f257a009f2e65f8271f9583.jpg
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom