- Joined
- Jan 28, 2011
- Messages
- 99,623
It's about 14 pages ago.
Are you implying that the Codex is prone to changing its hivemind twice daily?It's about 14 pages ago.
I dont understand why so many were white knighting might and magic 10 and discard this game because guido seems "arrogant",this guys already made games, theres already a lot to show and that doesnt seems more dumbed down than usual. Stretch goals arent the best , the 500$ full access to an additionnal class(yes i understand everyone will be able to use it for a bit, but still) is completely retarded and will be probably available to everyone who got it from pirate bay but not to the honest 25$ backer.
However if we are not backing this who will, i am pretty sure the turn based blobber is not so niche , but people interested into that are people of .. a certain age who may not be aware of l kickstarter campaigns. This guy should get a real publisher and advertise on steam.I backed it, but highly doubt it will get 390k .
The guy is asking money upfront, how is that different from every other projects ? Might and amgic X despite being funded by ubisoft is early accces selling a promise of a game , its even worse .Its not critical approach its clearly bashing a potential good blobber because the creator is not a good marketing guy.
That may be part of it, but it's not the sole purpose. By extending criticism in a discussion, everyone involved can come to a greater understanding of their own likes and dislikes, and of the people around them. I think that most of us are here because we love gaming, and hope to learn about great games from one another, and in some small way shape the future of the industry. By sharing what works for us and what doesn't, we make a tiny mark on the consciousness of gamers everywhere. Can that criticism get nasty sometimes? Are some people completely unconstructive? Is the Codex infamous for the negativity of its comments overwhelmingly outweighing the positive? Sure. But, despite its dark side, honest bashing does have a place in the conversation about what we as gamers want to see (and spend our money on).The answer is quite a few. The sole purpose here of bashing this game seems to be enjoying bashing.
I only noticed it because the Watch preserved the typo, which I approve. This kind of unprofessional sloppiness probably isn't helping with potential backer confidence.Rules of egangement and a new screenshot
So far I've resisted the urge to kick this thing when it's down but
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/g3studios/deathfire-ruins-of-nethermore/posts/664123
I only noticed it because the Watch preserved the typo, which I approve. This kind of unprofessional sloppiness probably isn't helping with potential backer confidence.Rules of egangement and a new screenshot
Still very funny of course.
Someone would have to be very anal-retentive and petty to dismiss the project based on that.
Would it make sense to merge this thread with the following one? http://www.rpgcodex.net/forums/inde...e-ruins-of-nethermore-kickstarter-live.81204/
Just a suggestion as people keep posting in either of 2 with the same contents