Fugg, why does this always happen while I'm on drugs?
I have things to do, dammit.
Do you really not understand the difference between a hyperbole/exaggeration regarding of subject matter and caricature/ignorance regarding subject matter? Because I have the feeling that it's not getting through to you here. Because the point is very much that it's not "on point with the reality of it".
No, I really do not understand the difference.
You could've just said so from the beginning.
Luckmann during the night of the long knives: these SS morons just don’t have a nuanced understanding of fascism. [he gently caresses the Strasser brothers as they bleed out] true third positionism has... never... been... tried.
See, something like this would
actually have been a funny jab in the game, whereas in reality, it just comes across as lolrandom retardation.
But it
could've been funny.
Not really,you just see it from your ideological point of view mate
. You think that the communist responds are what real communist think and that the nationalist one are taken out of proportion
.
Not at all. It's not about "taken out of proportion". It's the fact that we on one side
do have
exaggeration (and sometimes not even exaggeration) of what real communists
do think and say, while on the other side we have
caricatures of what "Fascists"
could say as according to a very hodge-podge, muddy, unclear definition of "Fascism".
In game terms, Fascism can be just "muh foreigners" (this is probably the most common), or it could be nationalism, or revancholian independance, or it could just be plain racism, or it could be a belief in authoritarianism, or hierarchies, or simply royalism or militarism. It's not a matter of exaggeration or proportions, it's a matter of
random nonsense.
All the others, the writers clearly have some grasp of, by varying degrees, but it's very clear that when they wrote "fascism", they weren't even sure of how to consistently portray it or what attributes it would have aside from the usual hodge-podge of "things I probably disagree with and attribute loosely to muh Fascism".
While this is extremely common and in most games would've simply warranted "Eh, it's just retarded" and then dismissal, this is a fairly major oversight in a game that explicitly and overtly want to play around with politics and make fun of ideologies. There's countless of ways to do this in fun ways that would relate to Fascism or third-positionist ideology, as mentioned previously. For example, even the barest mention of foreigners in regards to labor organization, something Unions have been historically known to concern themselves with, is "Fascist", and a mention of the responsibility of leaders towards their people - one of the pillars of Fascism - contributes to Communism. It's hilariously awkward and seemingly random unless you're also politically ignorant yourself, in which case they might just as well have given you some ballot papers and rolled you down to play in the ball pit at McDonalds.
Also, notice how you said "the nationalist one", which is not what the game actually calls it. The fact that you
default to that in regards to the game as it relates to the topic should indicate even to you that there's a conflation of terms (and the understanding of those terms lacking) at play.
Centrists are the worst,even fucking commies are ten time better than centrist trying to drown everyone in their mediaocracy.
Not
radical centrism.
For whatever reason, Marxists seem particularly unable to relate to other human beings as actual human being
The fascination with isms goes hand in hand with a belief in one's own intellectual and moral superiority over the majority. This line of thinking goes back to the French revolution, traces of it can be seen in antiquity I guess.
I agree, completely, and there are plenty of these tendencies even among Fascists - it's arguably a regrettably cemented tenet of third-positionist proponents in general - but there's this entrenched inability or deeply internalized unwillingness to even relate to other people and where they're coming from, when it comes to Marxists. Note that I'm not even talking about
leftists in general, but
specifically Marxists, in my experience.
That's just it, it's not a Codex thing, it's a personal observation
This pretty much proves to me, that it's probably not them, but actually you. Your personal perception of said individuals is simply biased towards bunching them all together all the while claiming to understand their motivations...
Sure, believe that all you want - they certainly do, regardless of overtures of friendship and extensive personal relationships.
And obviously I'm "simply biased towards bunching them all together" when practically
all of them have acted that way. That's the
definition of consistency, and not all of us have had basic fucking pattern recognition beaten out of us. I bet you're simply biased towards bunching all tics together, but it's not them, it's definitely you, you fucking mongo.
I've seen this with no other political group or ideological subset, except perhaps once, and that guy was a socdem; while indicative of corruption, the one instance is not really enough to establish a pattern.
None of the people who have pulled these stunts on me were lefties, AFAIK anyway.
Of course not, you're one of the faithful.
Exactly. You see it from lefties because you're what they hate. I see it from rightoids for the same reason. People with opposed ideologies/religions/values punch each other with whatever they've got, news at 11.
But that's simply not true. I've never experienced the same
consistent behavior from libertarians or ancaps. I haven't experienced it from liberals or libsocs, nor even from socdems, long known for their scummy political behavior. Hell, even SJWs tend to just start screeching right away and it's over with. Centrists gonna centrist and default to a nod.
This Marxist assumption that you express, that "People with opposed ideologies/religios/value punch each other with whatever they've got", this politicization of personal responsibilities and relationships that comes along with the gospel of "Everything is politics" is exactly what I'm talking about, and is likely why it is so easy for you to pitch as some kind of acceptable status quo that should be expected, and could be exactly why Marxists in general find deceit of this nature so easy.
And while I have no difficulties understanding that chain of causality/line of thinking in itself, it is just so alien to me how you
get to that point. How do you dig that deep into the trashcan of ideology? How do you supplant personal relationships with politics? It seems to me like something much less than human. Not even animals are that way.
Now I've made myself depressed again.