Arkeus
Arcane
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2012
- Messages
- 1,406
I don't know, i am kinda intrigued by those fabulous five.I don't, which is my point.
I don't know, i am kinda intrigued by those fabulous five.I don't, which is my point.
This makes a lot of sense. But Hasbor's a bitch, not sure how they will react to this... especially since D&D 5 is releasing now. But damn, it would be cool...Can't believe no one guessed Dragonlance yet. I mean, come on. Obvious choice. Walgrave clearly gave Swen an ultimatum after D:OS release: get Dragonlance or I'm going back to metal, bitches.
Swen said:"We asked them a couple of months ago, so we'll ask them again now. Maybe they'll be interested. It's in the RPG space, that's for sure.
This makes a lot of sense. But Hasbor's a bitch, not sure how they will react to this... especially since D&D 5 is releasing now. But damn, it would be cool...Can't believe no one guessed Dragonlance yet. I mean, come on. Obvious choice. Walgrave clearly gave Swen an ultimatum after D:OS release: get Dragonlance or I'm going back to metal, bitches.
Come at me bro!
This makes a lot of sense. But Hasbor's a bitch, not sure how they will react to this... especially since D&D 5 is releasing now. But damn, it would be cool...Can't believe no one guessed Dragonlance yet. I mean, come on. Obvious choice. Walgrave clearly gave Swen an ultimatum after D:OS release: get Dragonlance or I'm going back to metal, bitches.
Come at me bro!
I'm not actually serious. I can't imagine even an eccentric european like Swen trying to make a Dragonlance game. It's so incredibly 80's-tastic.
I can't really think of a license worth acquiring for the sake of its setting per se (the basic idea such as Arcanum's "Jules Verne meets Tolkien" is usually pretty simple and easily duplicated while the specifics are neither important nor amazing enough to warrant paying for the whole package); for those that supposedly have money generating potential due to existing fanbase the advantage would be offset by the respective increase in price and the risk involved in potential failure of the project. A rules system that is tried, tested and really well suited to a computer RPG (as opposed to tailored to the pen & paper experience) would of course be interesting, but are there any obvious candidates?
I'm not sure, but most of these seem a terrible match for Larian who do goofy, but rather generic.Why are we listing random IPs again
Dragonlance...loved it as a teen, DM`d a long running campaign with AD&D 2E, so I could go for that.
I did make the mistake of starting to re-read the original trilogy. My God, I wish I hadn't, fucking laughably bad writing. Even Raistlin, who my younger, naive self thought was total badass.
Don't ruin the nostalgia for yourself like I did bros
Hmm been meaning to check that out, now I willDragonlance...loved it as a teen, DM`d a long running campaign with AD&D 2E, so I could go for that.
I did make the mistake of starting to re-read the original trilogy. My God, I wish I hadn't, fucking laughably bad writing. Even Raistlin, who my younger, naive self thought was total badass.
Don't ruin the nostalgia for yourself like I did bros
Going back and reading Dragonlance after the excellent Death Gate Cycle is an especially brutal experience.
Ah, so we're listing random neglected IPs Larian could rescue...
Magnum PI RPG
I want to be a Higgins
Because everyone wants the chance to self-quote and say "See, I told you so" once Swen goes public.Why are we listing random IPs again
Dragonlance...loved it as a teen, DM`d a long running campaign with AD&D 2E, so I could go for that.
I did make the mistake of starting to re-read the original trilogy recently. My God, I wish I hadn't, fucking laughably bad writing. Even Raistlin, who my younger, naive self thought was total badass.
Don't ruin the nostalgia for yourself like I did bros