Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Dragon Age: Inquisition Pre-Release Thread

Space Satan

Arcane
Vatnik
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
6,493
Location
Space Hell
Br4tYtjCAAA1-h7.jpg

Imagine someone at Biowhore dev team posted something like this. There would be an outrage, petitions, boycots, manchildren tears and EA would force entire studio to make a penance pilgrimage to the local fag holy site.
 

DalekFlay

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Oct 5, 2010
Messages
14,118
Location
New Vegas
I'm going to ignore you and I'm not going to lie about it. After I see the screens at high details . If you're going to waste your time, at least do something valuable to society and make a LP.

I might not play it day one because my PC needs an upgrade and it might not be finished by then. I'm sure you'll have PLENTY of Codexers to choose from however. Most talk a good game and then put 100 hours in anyway.
 
Joined
Jul 11, 2010
Messages
3,213
Location
Vostroya
Eh, I'll probably pirate that shit, just to seed it so more people could download it for free. And I usually don't pirate games anymore, thanks to Gabe and russian steam prices, and also to GOG and my huge backlog of unplayed oldies there. But this fucking game I'll pirate as a matter of principle. As for playing it - I'll probably try it, I'm morbidly curious if they could make anything worse than DA2.
And to think, back when it just came out I kinda liked DA:O.
 

Utgard-Loki

Arcane
Joined
Dec 29, 2011
Messages
1,933
You're not edgy enough.
yeah, how could i not like this amazing game that takes place in this beautiful run of the mill fantasy setting that makes no sense. with lovable characters such as minsc, the mentally handicapped ranger and viconia the EVUL rape victim drow cleric of an EVUL GAWDESS of EVUL. the amazing encounter design™ where half the monster manual is present in almost every dungeon and occasionally you meet a wizard or cleric. the great rtwp combat that encourages precise maneuvering smart use of abilities and rationing of items(just block a door with your fighter, let archers and wizards do their pewpew and then let the cleric heal people in case of unlucky rolls. fuck me if that's not tacticoolio what is?).

baldurs gate 2 might not be a completely bad game (like for example everything else bioware shat out after it), but it certainly is not a great, or even good, one.
 

Rake

Arcane
Joined
Oct 11, 2012
Messages
2,969
yeah, how could i not like this amazing game that takes place in this beautiful run of the mill fantasy setting that makes no sense.
Forgotten Realms isn't the best setting ever, but it's not ground to bash the game unless you dismiss every game set there or in similar generic settings, including Gold Box games, ToEE, Divinities, MotB.

with lovable characters such as minsc, the mentally handicapped ranger and viconia the EVUL rape victim drow cleric of an EVUL GAWDESS of EVUL.
Well, yes the character's are Biowarian in vein , but better than their recent offerings. Most of them aren't bad, and even if you dislike all of them, in BG they were mostly just stat screens.

the amazing encounter design™ where half the monster manual is present in almost every dungeon and occasionally you meet a wizard or cleric.
You are more mentally handicapped than Minsc. BG2 had the best encounter design from every RPG out there. It was one of the strongest parts of the game.

the great rtwp combat that encourages precise maneuvering smart use of abilities and rationing of items(just block a door with your fighter, let archers and wizards do their pewpew and then let the cleric heal people in case of unlucky rolls. fuck me if that's not tacticoolio what is?).
Well, you had more choices and abilities in combat than Gold Box games, Fallout games and Ultima games. And because BG2 had the aforementioned great encounter design, it's better than ToEE, despite the second having better combat system, wasted to kill bugbear after bugbear. With SCS, BG2 have one of the best combat in RPGs
 

DalekFlay

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Oct 5, 2010
Messages
14,118
Location
New Vegas
Forgotten Realms isn't the best setting ever, but it's not ground to bash the game unless you dismiss every game set there or in similar generic settings, including Gold Box games, ToEE, Divinities, MotB.

Yeah.

And honestly if you hate traditional fantasy settings then you're a pretty fucked RPG player, because 90% of RPGs use that setting.
 

Commissar Draco

Codexia Comrade Colonel Commissar
Patron
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
20,885
Location
Привислинский край
Insert Title Here Strap Yourselves In Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Divinity: Original Sin 2
Viconia was no rape victim, she did the raping.

Wymyn is raepe victim even while doin' the rapeing cause male patriarchy forces her to raape; check yo privilege you cis scum; compared to latter offering BG2 romances are OK; they happen over time, are not telegraphed and can be ended by taking the wrong choice easily... or your wifu being perma snuffed by your party members; just imagine the :butthurt: of modern Biodrones if Pirate Slut or Pedo Phantasy were choked by Avelline or Bro Dwarf in dark alley while main character takes piss. :incline:
 

set

Arcane
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
944

Uh, I don't know about you, but BG2 has some of the best encounter design around. There were no Ithilids in what's her face's Keep and there weren't any trolls in the prison where they kept Imoen. I think some recycling can be forgiven, considering a BG2 run from beginning to end that doesn't abuse glitches and is earnest in the player's pursuits to explore every nook and cranny... takes what -- a month of playtime? I'd be hard pressed to beat BG2, knowing all the things I know about it, in under several weeks, unless I were deliberately rushing through all the dialogue and skipping shit everywhere. BG2 is perhaps the longest 'modern' and 'mainstream' RPG I can think of. And you can't make players fight monocultures of enemies... so inevitably, there is going to be some reuse.

BG2 nevertheless is ten times more competently designed, encounter-wise, than any BioWare RPG of recent memory. DA3 will be just as poorly paced and designed as DA2 and DA:O, with cramped hallways for encounter areas, enemy melee/archer enemies with no notable abilities to be worried about, and WoW-ish bosses against dragons and liches. Will DA3 have an enemy lich that can stop time and rape your face? I think not. Will DA3 have melee enemies which can kill your beefiest tank in two hits? No way in hell! Will there be any memorable abilities or encounters in DA3? Nope. Who was Kangaxx in DA:O? He didn't have any memorable shit to worry about. Will there even be a 'secret boss' in DA3 a lowbie party can encounter? By the gods, no! BioWare is selling this game to people who enjoy antigames, not the "core".

I'm shocked by how Divinity OS is. I mean, the whole weather/environment design is perfect. A lot of enemy encounters are memorable just by how you can blow them all up with oil barrels or shock/freeze them in place (or how you have to deal with these things being placed around your party). DA:O tried to do this with a few random oil slicks hard-coded here and there... DOS has the balls to do it everywhere, to even make you use this stuff to survive. It also gives you multiple avenues to approach enemies from, severla times I found alrenate routes to reaching them because attacking them head-on put my party in a bad position. There's no such thing ever happenin in DAO or DA2 and I bet you a free copy of DA3 it won't occur in DA3 either. Because BioWare is terrible at designing everything.
 

Volourn

Pretty Princess
Pretty Princess Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Mar 10, 2003
Messages
24,995
"Will DA3 have melee enemies which can kill your beefiest tank in two hits?"

Not one BG2 melee enemy does. Not even the dragons.

Why are both the anti and pro BG2 sides lying in this thread? Oh eyah, it's the fukkin' Codex. Of course they lie. Can't have an HONEST debate. got to make shit up.
 

Volourn

Pretty Princess
Pretty Princess Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Mar 10, 2003
Messages
24,995
L0L That's a good one. But, unless your 'beefiest tank' has an IQ of a gnat it'll take more than 2 hits. Though, I'm sure he meant pure raw damage or else he'd have just said illithuids. After a cleric with harm could kill a tank in 2 hits too. Proves nothing.
 

hoverdog

dog that is hovering, Wastelands Interactive
Developer
Joined
Jul 8, 2010
Messages
5,589
Location
Jordan, Minnesota
Project: Eternity
yeah, how could i not like this amazing game that takes place in this beautiful run of the mill fantasy setting that makes no sense. with lovable characters such as minsc, the mentally handicapped ranger and viconia the EVUL rape victim drow cleric of an EVUL GAWDESS of EVUL. the amazing encounter design™ where half the monster manual is present in almost every dungeon and occasionally you meet a wizard or cleric. the great rtwp combat that encourages precise maneuvering smart use of abilities and rationing of items(just block a door with your fighter, let archers and wizards do their pewpew and then let the cleric heal people in case of unlucky rolls. fuck me if that's not tacticoolio what is?).

baldurs gate 2 might not be a completely bad game (like for example everything else bioware shat out after it), but it certainly is not a great, or even good, one.
1371742896360-dumpfm-girlnymph-now-thats-what-I-call-EDGY.png
 
Unwanted

Goat Vomit

Andhaira
Andhaira
Joined
Apr 15, 2014
Messages
391
I dunno, he makes some good points. I think it all depends on what you judge the games in relation to. If you're used to swimming in a river of shit and find a dirty but relatively clean lagoon you will enjoy it so much more than someone who hopes for crystal clear water to bathe in. I'm not saying that swimming in a river of shit makes you a bad person or anything especially if you have no options, I'm not bigoted against indians after all, what I am saying is that it's okay to wish for more than that. There's little that's edgy about it.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2012
Messages
188
yeah, how could i not like this amazing game that takes place in this beautiful run of the mill fantasy setting that makes no sense. with lovable characters such as minsc, the mentally handicapped ranger and viconia the EVUL rape victim drow cleric of an EVUL GAWDESS of EVUL. the amazing encounter design™ where half the monster manual is present in almost every dungeon and occasionally you meet a wizard or cleric. the great rtwp combat that encourages precise maneuvering smart use of abilities and rationing of items(just block a door with your fighter, let archers and wizards do their pewpew and then let the cleric heal people in case of unlucky rolls. fuck me if that's not tacticoolio what is?).

baldurs gate 2 might not be a completely bad game (like for example everything else bioware shat out after it), but it certainly is not a great, or even good, one.
So close. Keep trying. :lol:
 

set

Arcane
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
944
L0L That's a good one. But, unless your 'beefiest tank' has an IQ of a gnat it'll take more than 2 hits. Though, I'm sure he meant pure raw damage or else he'd have just said illithuids. After a cleric with harm could kill a tank in 2 hits too. Proves nothing.
I dunno Volourn, Minsc is my beefiest tank in BG2 usually and he always dies in 2 hits.

Ithilids are particular challenging when those chaos/fear (forget their names, it's been so long) enemies are paired up with them -- they scatter your party if you don't position right/resist the fear, and then the Ithilids isolate your melee and you get owned.

Why would you get any intelligence on a fighter anyway? C'mon, this is D&D. Two hits. It's an interesting challenge, you have to pull back your front line after they take the first hit. There are probably better solutions, I know I abused door closing to separate Ithilid packs (can't do this in DA either, BioWare actively forbids you from even fleeing from encounters, or even initiating many of them with a large range gap; forget "closing doors" my god it's a notable thing if the encounter isn't scripted to spawn in your face when you trip an invisible wire).

What's reall nice about BG2 is there are ways to beat these enemies, and shit like Beholders -- pepole know the strategies thoroughly by now and if you start discussing BG2 I think some people take it for granted what these strategies are. In DAO, no one talks about "that tactic they used to defeat X", because who had trouble with the werewolf boss? What abilities did he even have again...? Oh wait, it was a she, wasn't it? Gee. The only memorable boss in DAO was that fat bitch and only because it was a fight which tested your endurance. That encounter was probably the best one in DAO, too bad everything leading up to it is bland boring shit. As for DA2, or hell, ME1-3, I can't name a memorable boss or encounter that tested my tactical use of skills. Even on the hardest difficulty, everything is pretty straight forward. Get it? Even the levels themselves are -- straight forward --. Not that BG2 didn't have its share of hallways, but there are many places where it did not.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom