I'm so tired of seeing this shit 'oh it's not a terrible game, it's just a bad DA game'It's kinda like Hogwarts Legacy, but gay(er). Meh game, bad DA game.it's quite decentSo what's the general consensus on the game?
Spot on description. I was wondering if anybody else was thinking this the other day.It's kinda like Hogwarts Legacy, but gay(er).
It's not a cope, but it isn't necessarily praise either. It's a milquetoast game that is mechanically competent, but boring and inoffensive (and infantile, in both writing and 'accessible' gameplay). The video game equivalent of some meh Pixar movie.Yeah i have noticed the "it's just a bad DA game" cope pop up a lot all of a sudden.
But what about those who willingly undergo the macabre ordeal of entering theCompiling a list of registered Veilguard players is vital work for the safety of the Codex. Perhaps it should be mandatory for them to inform us of their proclivities upfront before entering an area where RPGs are being discussed.
It is entirely not mechanically competentIt's a milquetoast game that is mechanically competent
Did the whole of Starbuck clap after that?
Probably the only video games journalist I can recall by face and name, and he has managed to get a lot of inside information just by interviewing annoyed developers. He does good work, and you do benefit from it, even if you end up watching someone else's retelling of his journalism, because you can't stand him.Also, I can't put my finger as to exactly why but I can't stand Jason Schreier. What a clown.
His gimmick is very cringe. Dude seems like a mega sperg.Oh yeah, Mr. "I didn't want to make this video".View attachment 57353
Don't come to youtube tomorrow.
I didn't actually watch the video but the thumbnail was too hilarious to pass up. I actually find this guy crazy talented from watching his gamedev videos, but he might be going a little too hard in this direction.
Find him kind of hard to watch. No particular reason. Something just doesn't resonate for me with him.
Compared to Devil May Cry 5, absolutely not. But as a AAA western game meant to appeal to the lowest common denominator, it's mechanically competent in that sense.It is entirely not mechanically competentIt's a milquetoast game that is mechanically competent
Baldur's Gate 3 was made by Larian. The same developers who made Divinity: Original Sin 1 and 2, both very successful games as well.So the games you mentioned failed because they were woke, but BG3 succeeded despite being woke? That's a bit of a double standard innit?
They are very based, because they don't care for wokeness of the West and focus on stories to make sense first and foremost.Korean webcomic authors are light years ahead of Bioware when it comes to writing fantasy stories.
I disagree. Having a competent story can still help a video game. And the "player agency" is very limited, even if we talk specifically about cRPGs, especially narrative-driven ones.You can't compare video game stories to regular stories, though. Video game stories must account for player agency and drive gameplay.
Drop this crap, it doesn't fly. Even if most people here didn't touch the game, it's painfully obvious just by watching couple minutes of gameplay that it's "mechanically atrocious".Compared to Devil May Cry 5, absolutely not. But as a AAA western game meant to appeal to the lowest common denominator, it's mechanically competent in that sense.
Oh, NOW you are criticizing the game. Now, not when it came out."The sequel to Inquisition’s Dread Wolf story is trapped in an action game with no interest in the past."
Compared to Devil May Cry 5, absolutely not. But as a AAA western game meant to appeal to the lowest common denominator, it's mechanically competent in that sense.It is entirely not mechanically competentIt's a milquetoast game that is mechanically competent
Yeah, even people who were excited for it were disappointed.Drop this crap, it doesn't fly. Even if most people here didn't touch the game, it's painfully obvious just by watching couple minutes of gameplay that it's "mechanically atrocious".Compared to Devil May Cry 5, absolutely not. But as a AAA western game meant to appeal to the lowest common denominator, it's mechanically competent in that sense.
Cut the shit. Most people that played it say the combat is good. It’s the one thing most people agree on.Drop this crap, it doesn't fly. Even if most people here didn't touch the game, it's painfully obvious just by watching couple minutes of gameplay that it's "mechanically atrocious".Compared to Devil May Cry 5, absolutely not. But as a AAA western game meant to appeal to the lowest common denominator, it's mechanically competent in that sense.
Heck even Witcher 3's combat has more depth.
Not entirely true. Look up console reviews of Baldur’s Gate 3 and you’ll see tons of “played the first combat encounter and uninstalled. I hate turned based combat. It’s boring.” They need ADHD combat loops with lots of particle effect, something Veilguard delivers.Compared to Devil May Cry 5, absolutely not. But as a AAA western game meant to appeal to the lowest common denominator, it's mechanically competent in that sense.It is entirely not mechanically competentIt's a milquetoast game that is mechanically competent
The lowest common denominator loves games like Baldur's Gate 3 and Elden Ring. These games have far more "mechnical competence" than Veilguard. Heck even Witcher 3's combat has more depth.
The idea that the masses loved dumbed down, shallow games already has been proven to be false when Final Fantasy Mystic Quest bombed decades ago. Already reproven when Final Fantasy XVI flopped last year.
"Most people" are not even sentient.Most people that played it say the combat is good. It’s the one thing most people agree on.
The consensus is that the combat is good/fine. It’s the lack of depth, bad writing and faggotry that everyone has problems with."Most people" are not even sentient.Most people that played it say the combat is good. It’s the one thing most people agree on.