Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Dragon's Dogma II - "They’re masterworks, all – you can’t go wrong"

darkpatriot

Arcane
Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
6,296
I hope that your pawn rebels against you in the last act of the game and becomes the true antagonist of the game.
 

Silverfish

Arbiter
Joined
Dec 4, 2019
Messages
3,929
why would i care what some villager want?

You misunderstood what I was saying (surprising, I know). I was speaking from my perspective and since I'm right, that's the only one that matters. You'll catch up eventually. Probably. Well, maybe.
 

Silverfish

Arbiter
Joined
Dec 4, 2019
Messages
3,929
yeah but still why would they care what a villager thinks

I was speaking from my perspective and since I'm right, that's the only one that matters.

damien_sandow___you_re_welcome_by_heavymetalgear_d518o1g-fullview.png
 

mediocrepoet

Philosoraptor in Residence
Patron
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
13,571
Location
Combatfag: Gold box / Pathfinder
Codex 2012 Codex+ Now Streaming! MCA Project: Eternity Divinity: Original Sin 2

Silverfish

Arbiter
Joined
Dec 4, 2019
Messages
3,929
Then shut up.

Nah. Funny enough, this argument got dropped in my lap (my original stance was just a defense of selfishness and this got tacked on), but now that I'm here, I wanna see how far I can take it.

yeah, whatever. now dig that fucking hole, peasant.

Not 'till I have a guarantee of four arisens to cover my back.

Guy is a bit fuzzy on what "universally" means unless there's a hidden qualifier such as, "within the circle jerk that has only @Silverfish And @DJOGamer PT as members."

It is specifically the scarcity of good taste that makes it such a commodity.

No one cares what you want. Piss off.

Obviously you do, based on the responses I've gotten.
 
Joined
Nov 23, 2017
Messages
4,635
Bitching about multiplayer is fucking stupid. Even if the game had it, it’s not like it would fuck with the pawn system.

I’m kind of surprised it seemingly doesn’t have multiplayer, and wouldn’t be too surprised if it wasn’t added in later. The first game was originally meant to have multiplayer in the original version of the Everfall... the old Endless Tower that was meant to connect all the other players worlds together. The original idea sounded like multiplayer would be regulated to that one specific dungeon, with an in-universe reason why players could interact with each other there. The Endless Tower seemed to get chopped up into the Everfall and Bitterblack Isle, with the only idea of it manifesting in gameplay kind of being how the Ur-Dragon battle works. If they’re doing stuff they couldn’t do the first time around, it wouldn’t be shocking if that came back somehow. Especially after DMC5 had that cameo system multiplayer where different player’s games will randomly intersect with each other from time to time.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom