Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Game News Fallout 4 Announced (for real this time)

norolim

Arcane
Joined
Nov 21, 2012
Messages
1,012
Location
Pawland
Oh, 6 pages of people assuring everyone they don't care about this game. Nice. Let me join you.

I watched the trailer. And

comment_ksG7DZEAcCqtlvO2yX1P9DvUwMTUi7M6.gif
 

Diggfinger

Arcane
Joined
Jan 6, 2014
Messages
1,241
Location
Belgium
I guess it depends where you're coming from. If you never played a Fallout game (or good old rpg's) and you get your hands on Fallout 3, or New Vegas you'll be fucking amazed - post apocalyptic open world rpg in 3d - fuck yeah! However, if you have played the first two Fallouts and you expect the same immersive story and atmosphere or if you're an rpg connoisseur you'll bitch about it ad infinitum because it could've been soooo much better. But let's consider for a moment why is this happening, why Bethesda doesn't submit to our infinite wisdom and make this the "perfect rpg". Number one issue would be that they are a company in the bussiness of making MONEY rather than GAMES. They are not some small indie company where folks get excited about this feature and that feature and are driven by passion - they couldn't be even if they wanted, it's simply not possible when you're this giant studio - way too many people with various interests and opinions. And most of the gamers out there - let's be blunt about it - are a bit dumb when it comes to advanced stats, complex mechanics and the lack of an arrow on the minimap - so even if they made this worthy succesor of Fallout 1/2 its reach would probably be much, much smaller than it currently is - which is a bad thing imho - at least this way it introduced more people to teh first 2 Fallouts (myself included). I am not defending Bethesda - I wouldn't dare do that here :)) - I am simply acknowledging that given the current situation Bethesda is doing what it should be doing - compromising between popamole and "perfect" rpg mechanics in order to have a large audience reach and make tons of money without blatantly dumbing down the gameplay so it can keep the appearance of a respectable, rpg-oriented company.

Fully agree and well spoken, sir :obviously:
 

Black

Arcane
Joined
May 8, 2007
Messages
1,873,182
On the bright side Jaesun's back.
Where's the bright side?

On the ACTUAL bright side, today I was banging meat for schabowe and while thinking of this abomination, howard and bethesda I managed to turn them into paper-thin deliciousness. It was very therapeutic too, easily recommended for everyone.
 

Makabb

Arcane
Shitposter Bethestard
Joined
Sep 19, 2014
Messages
11,753
wow with f4 announcement, New vegas on steam has 10,000 concurent players and f3 GOTY 3,000 players.
and the official trailer has 7 million views in one day. I don't even know if Star wars had so many after 1 day.
also 1st on top sellers on steam beating GTA V. goddamn.
This gonna be big, it will outsell Skyrim.
 

Sulimo

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Jun 22, 2009
Messages
3,230
Wasteland 2
A month or two ago I decided to start replaying Fallout 2, enjoyed it so figured "Let's start up F:NV that I bought for 5 euros because I love MCA".

Quit after 2 hours or something. Even Obsidian-fanboyism wouldn't let me play a game in that engine longer than it takes me to eat a kebab. Fallout 3 I removed from inventory and played for like 20 minutes when it first came out. So if Fallout 4 is going to be similar, I might as well not even bother.

God I hate Bethesda. Bland fucking games in bland fucking worlds filled with bland fucking characters. They wouldn't know how to make an enjoyable game if their life depended on it. No idea why people get hyped about it.
 

Goral

Arcane
Patron
The Real Fanboy
Joined
May 4, 2008
Messages
3,572
Location
Poland
So when can we expect Codex interview with Todd Howard? He already has the account here so it shouldn't be too hard.
 

Kron

Arcane
Joined
Apr 18, 2009
Messages
642
Location
The dark throne in Algalord
That trailer makes the game look like a bland mixup of Fallout 3 and Bioshock Infinite. Not that these aren't blandshit games to begin with.

I don't know, it just looks bland and boring. And even worse, it doesn't even FEEL like Fallout. Just the typical Bethesda incoherent mish-mash.
Fucking cities with skyscrapers, seriously?? Trees everywhere, colourful skies. Where's the endless wasteland, the red sunsets, the rust and desolation??

Bethesda are fucking retards catering to retard audiences, incapable of making a moody atmosphere.

:(
 

Kron

Arcane
Joined
Apr 18, 2009
Messages
642
Location
The dark throne in Algalord
Aesthetically, Post-apoc can be awesome. If you're not feeling creative visual-wise, just ripoff some 80's-early 90's post-apoc movies and comics. At least you'll end up with a better atmosphere than this bland copypaste.
Sometimes I think that due to the oversaturation of shitty science fiction games, and games in general, this uninspired 3.0 bland-future-science-fiction has taken hold and become established; most games now draw "inspiration" from this pool and therefore they all look the same. Like in many established creative mediums, videogames are now self-feeding from its own shitty creations.
 

dragonul09

Arcane
Edgy
Joined
Dec 19, 2014
Messages
1,448
That trailer makes the game look like a bland mixup of Fallout 3 and Bioshock Infinite. Not that these aren't blandshit games to begin with.

I don't know, it just looks bland and boring. And even worse, it doesn't even FEEL like Fallout. Just the typical Bethesda incoherent mish-mash.
Fucking cities with skyscrapers, seriously?? Trees everywhere, colourful skies. Where's the endless wasteland, the red sunsets, the rust and desolation??

Bethesda are fucking retards catering to retard audiences, incapable of making a moody atmosphere.

:(

Aren't you people tired of the endless wasteland filled with shit and nothing to do?I think it's time to see a more civilised version of Fallout where people are really trying to build a bigger community instead of acting like retarded monkeys and wearing tires as underwear.
I think the Boston area could be interesting, but what worries me the most is the deadbeat writing and their inaptitude to create good characters.
 

Makabb

Arcane
Shitposter Bethestard
Joined
Sep 19, 2014
Messages
11,753
top down view and male only. Butthurt will be glorious.


In Fallout 4, mixing things up, we are making the game more ‘Story Based’ and the player character will finally talk, and narrate his storyline. At the beginning of the game, you create your character (You can only be a male in the main story),”.


PC version includes a “Classic Mode” that will feature a bird’s-eye view like the original titles


FUUUUUUUYEAAAAAAAAAAAAA

http://www.lazygamer.net/rumour/wild-rumour-no-gender-options-in-fallout-4/





the site is calling 'disturbing' that you cannot play as a female.

I’d be pretty down, as I tend to play games of this sort as a fiery, chaotic neutral red-headed woman.
 

Country_Gravy

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Mar 24, 2004
Messages
3,407
Location
Up Yours
Wasteland 2
Fallout 4? Was there was a fallout 3 that no one told me about? The cutscene here is pretty good, I just hope they pull off the isometric view and turn-based combat.
 

Kron

Arcane
Joined
Apr 18, 2009
Messages
642
Location
The dark throne in Algalord
dragonul09 said:
Aren't you people tired of the endless wasteland filled with shit and nothing to do?

This isn't a problem with wastelands, it's a problem with how the game and the wasteland is designed.

Fallout 3 felt simultaneously cramped and empty, which is not exactly good for a post apocalyptic wasteland.

Besides, civillized in my post-apoc? Heresy I say. The whole fun of the genre is small pockets of corrupt pseudo civilization, with chaos and danger outside of that, and all the human excesses given free reign. That mixed up with rusted remains of a previous "golden" civilization.
 

Infinitron

I post news
Patron
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
100,049
Codex Year of the Donut Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
Besides, civillized in my post-apoc? Heresy I say. The whole fun of the genre is small pockets of corrupt pseudo civilization, with chaos and danger outside of that, and all the human excesses given free reign. That mixed up with rusted remains of a previous "golden" civilization.

Not sure you understand what Fallout is about and why people here prefer FO:NV over FO3
 

Makabb

Arcane
Shitposter Bethestard
Joined
Sep 19, 2014
Messages
11,753
New Vegas was closest to the old FAllout we could get with that engine, but if Todd will bring top down view back, even without the assests that obsidian made New Vegas, Fallout might be back again.
 

Kron

Arcane
Joined
Apr 18, 2009
Messages
642
Location
The dark throne in Algalord
Infinitron said:
Not sure you understand what Fallout is about and why people here prefer FO:NV over FO3

I was talking about the original games. Are we on the same note here? Have people forgotten what Fallout was like? Fucking Mad Max 2 with more flavor stuff and writing sprinkled on top of it. Post-apoc looks and setting.

F3 and F:NV don't even count. F3 was retarded, and F:NV was just plain boring with some insufferable Sawyer thrown in as bonus; plus retaining quite a good speck of the clumsiness and retardedness of F3.
 

FeelTheRads

Arcane
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
13,716
the site is calling 'disturbing' that you cannot play as a female.

I call disturbing that it's named Fallout, but hey what can you do start an internet war
 
Last edited:

Mech

Cipher
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
635
Only another week and a bit until E3 and then another 100+ pages of rage. Good timing on Bethesdas part, truly.
 

Ismaul

Thought Criminal #3333
Patron
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
1,871,834
Location
On Patroll
Codex 2014 PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015 Codex 2016 - The Age of Grimoire Make the Codex Great Again! Grab the Codex by the pussy Insert Title Here RPG Wokedex Strap Yourselves In Codex Year of the Donut Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech A Beautifully Desolate Campaign My team has the sexiest and deadliest waifus you can recruit.
@Vault Dweller what are your impressions?
The trailer shows Bethesda's creativity and deep understanding of the Fallout setting, so fuck yeah, I'm excited. If the rumors are true, it will be a dramatic experience paying homage to The Last of Us and the story will revolve around you seeking revenge for the death of your wife, a middle-aged woman.
Most likely their best post-Daggerfall game eh? Like you said about Fallout 3 if I remember correctly. Skill checks in dialogues and all that.

Not that it isn't true; they can improve on their best efforts and it'll still remain shit.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom