Just fucking cooperate with that guy who makes Your World or whatever the fuck is its name.
Even after Fallout: New Vegas outsold Fallout 3.... Bethesda *logic*.
Keep in mind that while NV initially sold very well, it apparently sold less than F03 did.
Keep in mind that while NV initially sold very well, it apparently sold less than F03 did.
That's not what I read. I read that it sold more.
Yes, it is confirmed that New Vegas sold more.
Yes, it is confirmed that New Vegas sold more.
It's not just unit sold that determines the success of a game. Steam and MS Live could tell Bethesda how many gamers never got past the Primm before getting upset and quitting.
Those Steam and MS Live stats are gonna determine the future of the series.
I want NV to be the more popular game, but reading the FNV vs FO3 arguments on the web really makes me wonder.
Keep in mind that while NV initially sold very well, it apparently sold less than F03 did.
That's not what I read. I read that it sold more.
Yes, it is confirmed that New Vegas sold more.
Keep in mind that while NV initially sold very well, it apparently sold less than F03 did.
That's not what I read. I read that it sold more.
Yes, it is confirmed that New Vegas sold more.
The only confirmations I've seen have been unsourced comments on the 'dex. Got a link>
It would be quite interesting to know how many DLCs from NV were sold, even percentage compared to the core game.
1. Unless Pete is a prophet then all that is is him hyping a cash cow.
2. VGchartz is shit.
Companies don't usually publicly release game sale numbers hence my skepticism.
1. Unless Pete is a prophet then all that is is him hyping a cash cow.
2. VGchartz is shit.
Companies don't usually publicly release game sale numbers hence my skepticism.
Skepticism of what? We have no proof that FO3 outsold New Vegas either. It is more likely that NV sold more because it was a sequel. Lots of consoletards probably got FO3 used because they had no idea what Fallout is.
I can find two things:
1) Pete Hines expected FO:NV to outsell FO3 even before it was released. You wouldn't doubt Pete, would you? http://www.computerandvideogames.com/246062/new-vegas-to-outsell-fallout-3-bethesda/
2) FO:NV outsold FO3 in the first week of its release. http://www.nma-fallout.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=56728
I can find two things:
1) Pete Hines expected FO:NV to outsell FO3 even before it was released. You wouldn't doubt Pete, would you? http://www.computerandvideogames.com/246062/new-vegas-to-outsell-fallout-3-bethesda/
2) FO:NV outsold FO3 in the first week of its release. http://www.nma-fallout.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=56728
http://au.gamespot.com/news/fallout-new-vegas-ships-5-million-6283689
There's gotta proper numbers somewhere.
Also, I'm getting the impression that PC copies make up a bigger proportion of their sales than what Bethesda claims.
fLaMbOaStiN said:And as for which one i'd prefer, Fallout NV or FO3.. Hmm.. Well i'd defiantly say FO3 has a stronger main story line and is fleshed out very well thru the ton of DLC available for it.. But NV emphasizes more on exploreation and feels WAY more like a real post apocalyptic SIM/Game..
NV barely has any real exploration in it with most locations on the map amounting to little more than a shack with a bottle of booze and some drugs in it
NV barely has any real exploration in it with most locations on the map amounting to little more than a shack with a bottle of booze and some drugs in it
Last time I checked the Mojave desert wasn't full of stuff in real life...
secondary dungeons\locations in FO3 were often copy-pasted sewers\metro anyway.
The rumors are true, Fallout 4 will take place in Boston. In case you haven't heard, Bethesda has recently been scoping out and researching Boston. They also have a strong connection to MIT. I may or may not be an MIT employee. But that's really all I can say for fear of losing my job.
I am telling you it will take place in Boston. Whether you believe me or not, how do you feel about a Fallout Boston?
Maybe not, but the story takes place in and around fucking vegas. Vegas itself could've been much bigger.
Plus, there were a lot of missed opportunities, like the other two bunkers near the BoS base. Could've turned those into dungeons instead of filling them up with concrete.
They were but they did a good enough of a job adding unique flavors to most of them that I didn't mind.
http://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/yexpi/fallout_4_will_take_place_in_boston/
The rumors are true, Fallout 4 will take place in Boston. In case you haven't heard, Bethesda has recently been scoping out and researching Boston. They also have a strong connection to MIT. I may or may not be an MIT employee. But that's really all I can say for fear of losing my job.
I am telling you it will take place in Boston. Whether you believe me or not, how do you feel about a Fallout Boston?
salt according to taste
The Strip or all the suburbs\ruins around it? If you want to complain about the scale, then you may as well ask why Jean Sky Diving isn't 20 miles walk from Goodsprings. Oblivion had a large map but it was largely pointless to trek across it.
mod the game.
I'm not complaining about the scale, I'm complaining about the lack of large explorable locations/dungeons. The problem with the NV map wasn't that it was small, it was too empty for my tastes.
Mods do not factor when I give my opinion of games. Plus, most new location mods are just new fucking houses I don't actually need because Lucky 38 suits me just fine.