Life of the Party
Arcane
- Joined
- May 8, 2018
- Messages
- 3,535
And Aztecs.
Sunset Invasion - Rise of the Olmecs
Olmecs arrive in anachronistic sailboats with medievalesque mesoamerican weapons.
This maybe will be a good game in a couple year after 7 DLCs. But I wager at release EU Rome will remain the better game even flawed as it is. The republic mechanics were funny.
I'd honestly rather have an ahistorical chinese invasion.
Its also from the pre-mana era so it will always have that over Imperator.
Edit: Surprised to see no salt over the launch-day DLC. I'm not even one to complain about that stuff usually because I just expect it, but even I'm salty as fuck over them cutting visual world landmarks they were advertising as baseline features and improvements over past games and selling them as DLC.
This setting is tailor-made for the return of the Atlanteans. Either that or Midnight Sunset Invasion with Thuleans, Hyperboreans, Arimaspi and Issedones.
There is also, of course, Sub-Saharan Africa but Paradox wouldn't dare.
This setting is tailor-made for the return of the Atlanteans. Either that or Midnight Sunset Invasion with Thuleans, Hyperboreans, Arimaspi and Issedones.
There is also, of course, Sub-Saharan Africa but Paradox wouldn't dare.
You people are so naive,assuming that the basic civs are already here . The first one already a pre-order bonus,the Greek one. We will have gauls,german,iberian,british,egyptian,cartage,then rome one etc etc. Most likely it will be very bear bones game.
b-stop pyramid quotingbeats
Nob-stop pyramid quotingbeats
You people are so naive,assuming that the basic civs are already here . The first one already a pre-order bonus,the Greek one. We will have gauls,german,iberian,british,egyptian,cartage,then rome one etc etc. Most likely it will be very bear bones game.
To be real, their DLC are bare bones too. Even cultures they focus on with DLC in 5 year old games like CK2 are basically limited to a handful of events that are the equivelant of a single forum post in actual size. That's just always been how Paradox games are, if you don't do some serious LARPing in your head most playthroughs are pretty flavorless.
I don't know why I was thinking this would be something different. It's just yet another paradox snorefest interactive screensaver.
To be fair they are pretty complex historical "simulators". It is just that we have put far too much time in them and could see past the mechanical illusions. Once you see past the mechanics you just get annoyed at all the missed opportunities. The best thing that they did in EU is added new missions system. That way you could just sit down for 10 hours and play a campaign in 150 years and feel satisfied at the end.Yet it just hurts too look at how lazy and lacklustre their content is. The only really good campaign is Byzantium.
Also it is the only waifu on the slave market. A bit of good competition will be good for the genre. But the hard part is the engine and the whole ai calculation thing,tho EU's ai is a lot dumber than it was on release.Paradox is not bad waifu, it's just that for her maintance cost she ought to have better and more believable boobs.
Totally different games mate,FoG is a turn based battle simulator,IR is a fucking grand strategy with zero battle simulation. It is like comparing caesar 3 to total war rome.Speaking of competition, Imperator: Rome or Field of Glory: Empires? Is there any reason to believe FoG:E will bring anything exciting to the table?
That is interesting,didn't know that. I found only this video that have something of the game.I haven't properly researched FoG:E and thought the game would be slightly more than Field of Glory 2 + campaign map.
That is interesting,didn't know that. I found only this video that have something of the game.I haven't properly researched FoG:E and thought the game would be slightly more than Field of Glory 2 + campaign map.