Lyric Suite
Converting to Islam
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2006
- Messages
- 58,559
Meh, mob is bugged, they can now do stab attacks from far away.
This stems from the notion that the material reality is meaningless and of no importanceThe truth is that it is the "poor" who are the most villanous, literally, as the term "villain" was literally intended to describe peasants (the word comes from the Latin "villanus", which signified those who worked on the soil, I.E., peasants precisely) and is point in fact completely analogous to the "Shudra" of the Hindu caste system. The peasant is at the lowest level of spiritual development because his world revolves around sense experience and little else. His "values" are good food, family, friends, work, comfort, everything that pertains to the material and merely emotional side of human existence. The higher castes are superior precisely because their values are of a more "transcendent" kind. The values of the nobility were superior because those values were supra material. Chivalry, honor, sacrifice, the ability to both face death and deal death in battle. And as for the clergy and especially the monks, their values were the highest of them all, for their world revolved around seeking trascendence and cut ties with the material world entirely.
Not really. No one really forces you to sleep with women/cheat on Theresa. Neither does anyone force you to drink to lower lockpicking via the oh-so-awesome-perk. Same with gorging yourself with food... no questline forces you to over-eat. And obviously no one forces you to steal, ever.The game was not designed with "every type of character gets their own piece of content" in mind. You're not allowed to larp, it's a game where you play as a pre-defined character - Henry, and Henry is a fornicator, a drinker and a petty thief.
This stems from the notion that the material reality is meaningless and of no importanceThe truth is that it is the "poor" who are the most villanous, literally, as the term "villain" was literally intended to describe peasants (the word comes from the Latin "villanus", which signified those who worked on the soil, I.E., peasants precisely) and is point in fact completely analogous to the "Shudra" of the Hindu caste system. The peasant is at the lowest level of spiritual development because his world revolves around sense experience and little else. His "values" are good food, family, friends, work, comfort, everything that pertains to the material and merely emotional side of human existence. The higher castes are superior precisely because their values are of a more "transcendent" kind. The values of the nobility were superior because those values were supra material. Chivalry, honor, sacrifice, the ability to both face death and deal death in battle. And as for the clergy and especially the monks, their values were the highest of them all, for their world revolved around seeking trascendence and cut ties with the material world entirely.
This might be true in Hinduism, but it is false in Christianity
And trying to reconcile the philosophical distinctipns between the two cultures is stupid
They are not the same
If anything, the Western idea of superioty between the different classes rests on the responsibilities of their office
Not really. No one really forces you to sleep with women/cheat on Theresa. Neither does anyone force you to drink to lower lockpicking via the oh-so-awesome-perk. Same with gorging yourself with food... no questline forces you to over-eat. And obviously no one forces you to steal, ever.The game was not designed with "every type of character gets their own piece of content" in mind. You're not allowed to larp, it's a game where you play as a pre-defined character - Henry, and Henry is a fornicator, a drinker and a petty thief.
The only part you might be right is the killing, but that is simply because the stronger you get, the easier it is to kill people in 1 swing. No joke.
Been years since I played this but do you really miss out on quests if you play it nice?
I think that's the issue though. The game doesn't aknowledges your character choices, you can simply chose not do something and the game doesn't react to that choice, you basically just skipped or lost content. Which i'm not saying its necessarely a bad thing but it's a bit one sided in this game. All the "moral" options makes you lose content. Play as an immoral scoundrel and you lose nothing.
I think cucking the guy who saved your life right at the start was already pushing it.Damn, Peshek now wants me to steal an illuminated book from Hanush. This is pushing it. Even though its just a stupid game my own moral fiber is screaming at the sacrilegious nature of this act. Since this was my first run i'm pretty much doing everything but come next play and i'll definintely go full paladin. No robbery, no thieving quests. And of course if i can get this stupid merciful achievement in this run, no stealth. Just full frontal combat, with combat mods on top of it.
You miss out on "activities" such as when millers and beggars send you to steal or pickpocket items. But real quests? No.Been years since I played this but do you really miss out on quests if you play it nice?
Can anyone confirm this?
Ok.You miss out on "activities" such as when millers and beggars send you to steal or pickpocket items. But real quests? No.Been years since I played this but do you really miss out on quests if you play it nice?
Can anyone confirm this?
And that's exactly it.At least they gave Godwin a background that is different from that of a usual priest. Guy is an ex-soldier, if I remember correctly. So his behavior can be chalked up to him not being able to let go of some of his old habits.
And that's exactly it.At least they gave Godwin a background that is different from that of a usual priest. Guy is an ex-soldier, if I remember correctly. So his behavior can be chalked up to him not being able to let go of some of his old habits.
Godwin is not what a fat atheist thinks is a cool priest.
nothingNot sure what i'm doing wrong.
nothingNot sure what i'm doing wrong.
Clearly is a very strong wordi'm arguing against is the idea anything BUT the material is meaningless and of no importance, which is clearly the perspective of the working class. I remember my grandfather used to tell me he would have gone to church only once he saw priests getting a job, which is clearly a materialist perspective who sees no value in invisible and trascendent realities.
I would say the trouble arises when one puts primacy of the material over the immaterial and vice-versa - or worse rejects one, for the otherIt's obvious that the relationship with material reality is a troubled one.
Says youit is an obvious reality that the Hindu notion of caste is true
Says you"History" says nothing of the like becuase there's no such thing as "history" in the first place. Everything is cyclical, "linear" progress or decline is a myth.
because it thrives on efficient stratification