Storyfag
Perfidious Pole
Show. Us. On. The. Doll. Where. Thay. Touched. You.my main gripe with wizards was never whether they are fascy or not, it has always been the inevitable magocratic tyranny that will ensue.
Noooo! Not that kind of doll!
Show. Us. On. The. Doll. Where. Thay. Touched. You.my main gripe with wizards was never whether they are fascy or not, it has always been the inevitable magocratic tyranny that will ensue.
no other group would be strong enough to be their equal
thay is ghey.
What's not to like??I don't like Thay because it's a country ruled by evil wizards who are evil.
glad to see spell casting is still just pew-pew contest for victor.Clerics, Druids and Psions are imo stronger than Wizards in 3.5e. They can do every shit that wiz can do with self heal and more survivability.
While it is camp and peak trash, and we do love trash, Thay never evolved past that since its inception in 1988.What's not to like??I don't like Thay because it's a country ruled by evil wizards who are evil.
i am guessing the password:In my personal setting, clerics and paladins have to be circumcised. But they can have wives and are encouraged to do so since they have be part of specific tribe. Being male is a requirement to be part of the clergy as well.
so its low-magic or no-magic evenI am writing the setting book now. That's why I posted the foreword 3 pages ago ;dLacrymas do you have your setting in some pdf? or blog?
im not going to read 55 pages of shitposting.
Actually it would be Levites.i am guessing the password:In my personal setting, clerics and paladins have to be circumcised. But they can have wives and are encouraged to do so since they have be part of specific tribe. Being male is a requirement to be part of the clergy as well.
Jews
that's my final answer.
i bet rabbi still sucks their penises.Actually it would be Levites.i am guessing the password:In my personal setting, clerics and paladins have to be circumcised. But they can have wives and are encouraged to do so since they have be part of specific tribe. Being male is a requirement to be part of the clergy as well.
Jews
that's my final answer.
There is magic, just no arcane magic. Some of my controversial ideas include no arcane spellcasters of any kind, only women being able to be barbarians, paladins who get castrated if they break their vow of chastity, people needing permission to make babies. I'm probably forgetting something. I remember someone accusing me of inserting my fetishes into the lore.so its low-magic or no-magic even
and what are your controversial ideas?
[/SPOILER]
pew-pew
A "race" born with the superior genes of magic is a fascist's wet dream, yes.
Intelligence being genetic, this makes it a fascistic concept in the eyes of Lacrymas. Likewise other in-born traits. Best sprinters only from Africa? Fascistic. Weightlifter Slavs? Fascistic. Habsburg jaw? Fascistic.Anyone except brainlets can become a wiz in dnd. In hp is a pure genetic trait.
Anyone with stats above 10 is a fascist in the eyes of lackeyofmass.Intelligence being genetic, this makes it a fascistic concept in the eyes of Lacrymas. Likewise other in-born traits. Best sprinters only from Africa? Fascistic. Weightlifter Slavs? Fascistic. Habsburg jaw? Fascistic.Anyone except brainlets can become a wiz in dnd. In hp is a pure genetic trait.
That's not what people are saying.The more concerning aspect is how you think we somehow don't have to follow rules when we live with other people.
Do it faggotim not going to read 55 pages of shitposting.
paladins who get castrated if they break their vow of chastity, people needing permission to make babies
The only rule (of the controversial ones) enforced by "the government" is having to seek permission to have babies. The paladin thing is strictly within the ranks of the paladins as a way to atone for being born without the blessing of the church (i.e. the mother didn't get permission). There are other ways to become a paladin but all of them involve some atonement or other, so the vow of chastity remains.The more concerning aspect is how you think we somehow don't have to follow rules.
The thing is these rules are established and constantly negotiated and renegotiated between people all the time, they do not require a overarching government authority to do so unless they severely break those rules (such as the rules made laws).