ts just not true. They either played when it first came out and quit or tried again a few years later, acted like a spaz looking for who knows what.
Nah, I just actually studied game design and can tell depth from breadth.
I also happened to work for years on procedural generation, so I know when something just looks different but is actually entirely the same.
There is a tremendous amount of planet types with exapansive caves and oceans, crashed freighters, bases, outposts etc.
All of which are generated in a style of procedural generation that creates vast worlds that are entirely devoid of meaning and character.
Nothing placed on a planet has any purpose to it, it's all just "throw these few dozen things somewhere at random on this planet, make the fauna and flora look crazy*, and make sure each planet has at least these things so the player can fulfill the minimal game loop".
This kind of generation is also the reason the universe is (almost) unlimited - it's all just pure randomness, devoid of almost any thought behind it.
* Credit where credit is due, the random plants and animals are fairly amazing.
The base building is in-depth if you are into that.
It's basic survival stuff as well as a few toolboxes.
There is no depth here, only different coats of paint.
Please don't make yourself look even more like you have no clue what you are talking about.
There are many ship types of which you can own multiple including a freighter.
Wow. Multiple ship types. Crazy. Unheard of.
I bet they all behave entirely differently and require completely different skill sets?
Oh, wait, no, they don't.
They, too, are all more or less the same ship just varying in the amount of slots / equipment / cargo space they have. No depth, only breadth.
You can name the galaxy, planet, and everything you find on it if you are the one to discover it.
You have to be fucking kidding me.
If that's what counts as depth these days, that would explain a lot about game "journalist" ratings...
There is a main quest and procedural quests. There is a lot more to the game than these no imagination hacks are letting on.
All of which is as shallow as a puddle. Exactly as I was saying. Real depth doesn't need imagination to fool yourself into believing a game is something it isn't.
But thanks for confirming it.
You have basically seen the entire game a few hours in
How many hours? like 20? Kinda wanna try this shit
Tried multiple times and each time it took me about 12-20 hours to get really, really bored by all the sameness.
So I'd say give it a go, yeah. Good for one attempt, IMO.