Nano
Arcane
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2016
- Messages
- 4,817
Why shouldn't they join in?Otherwise it would have been kind of awkward with the rest of party in the same room.
Why shouldn't they join in?Otherwise it would have been kind of awkward with the rest of party in the same room.
Yuo mean the guys who kicked him out for being too evil?Why shouldn't they join in?Otherwise it would have been kind of awkward with the rest of party in the same room.
Maybe they kicked him out because he didn't give them the chance to rape and torture the prisoner.Yuo mean the guys who kicked him out for being too evil?
>Experienced and mature playersYeah,Tony did seem to be a Lawful Evil character. However,his severe coke abuse and paranoia led to his downfall,he became more and more violent and unstable.
I suppose playing in an Evil party can be done,but only by experienced and mature players and DM.
I agree, he was more criminally ambitious. And the drug trade is a very brutal and dangerous world so you need to be tough to surviveI don't recall Tony doing anything evil.
Missed opportunity for you to just reply ‘lamenting’Just do whatever Drakensang did.Greetings.
How do you prefer female characters to be portrayed in RPG's? Do you like them as chainmail bikini barbarians? Rogue/Bard type characters like Leliana or Sharwyn? Spellcasters?
Or do you like them "-4 Str go back to the kitchen"?
Finally,should there even be women in RPG's?
Neutral. Lawful requires submission.If like Tony you live by your own personal code but break society's laws, are you lawful or chaotic?
Let's skip over the nature of the drug business, if you kill only those that seek to harm you and only those that seek to harm others that you deem innocent, are you good? Damn, maybe I'm wrong about Tony's alignment the more I think about it.
He's just a regular citizen who tended towards chaotic neutral instead of lawful neutral. I don't see a convincing argument for him being evil, breaking the law does not make you evil after all.Is he evil because he made a living off of something that, while illegal and potentially harmful, was a product that was in demand that he didnt force on anyone?
Could he be seen as good even because he actually gave back to his family and community?
No, they are.good & evil aren't some universal constant
In a D&D universe, an evil entity performs an evil action because they are evil. Inherently evil is a concept that exists, they are evil because the universe has decided it to be so.No, they are.good & evil aren't some universal constant
Only in creatures that are inherently Evil. Prime Material World creatures get a choice just like our universe.In a D&D universe, an evil entity performs an evil action because they are evil. Inherently evil is a concept that exists, they are evil because the universe has decided it to be so.No, they are.good & evil aren't some universal constant
In our universe, a person becomes evil because they decided to perform an evil action.
Yeah, that's what I said. There is not evil or good but what men do. But there are evil and good actions. That is the constant.In a D&D universe, an evil entity performs an evil action because they are evil. Inherently evil is a concept that exists, they are evil because the universe has decided it to be so.No, they are.good & evil aren't some universal constant
In our universe, a person becomes evil because they decided to perform an evil action.