JamesDixon
GM Extraordinaire
Whoever started giving an inch to these kinds of "realism objections" should have been hanged as example to the others.Nothing wrong with having female warriors in fantasy setting. Just like there is nothing wrong with that same characters being beautiful and dressed in chain bikinis.
Problem is that modern day outrage brigade wants women in fantasy settings (and all other settings) to be ugly and manly due "realism". But at the same time denying the truth that in case of realism women would not serve as warriors.
Whole idea of selective absolute adherence to "realism" in fiction very soon gets stupid and paradoxical.
So you end up with nation of unattractive women without even an exception.
Same thing happened with "chainmail bikinis" as "unrealistic" while completely missing the point of ceremonial uniforms and showing off of nobles and higher ups.
While low level grunts had whatever gear was the cheapest, Roman centurions i.e. had custom made, bronze-cast idealised form of torso as armor.
It was never neccessary for combat to be in that shape, but peacocking and signalling their status was a must.
Now, if you correlate even bigger and more fragile women egos and neverending battle for being the hottest chick around, I don't doubt that (if they existed) female warriors of noble descent would be half-naked, wearing ornamental armors that accentuate their body shape.
Which would be fabulous from all the care they put in.
My players in my Myths of Malignost game are finding out that women in combat roles are having to do double duty as both combatants and increasing the size of the tribe. The game started with 150 people. Originally the population was split 75 men and 75 women, but two players wanted to have their 6 man party be harems of 1 man and 5 women. Thus, the initial population ended up being 65 men and 85 women. I had two players drop so their characters got turned into dragons. The population further dropped to 59 men and 79 women.
After one year of game time the population had 114 births that were single, twins, and triplets. JarlFrank rolled 1d100 to determine how many boys to girls there were. His roll was 27% so that meant that 83% of the babies were female.
The total population stands at 252.
167 of them are female and 87 male
Realism does have a role if you want it to. The tribe at its current rate will be amazons if the men can't increase their numbers.
Also, my world has strict sexual dimorphism. Females are limited to 16 Strength for non-warrior classes. Warrior classes can only have a max of 18 (50). They do get to increase one of their attributes max in Intelligence, Wisdom, and Constitution up by 1 point as compensation. If a woman wants to go beyond 16/18 (50) Strength it will take a Wish or similar to make it happen.
Last edited: