Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Company News Paradox and Obsidian to announce something evil on March 15th

Xzylvador

Arbiter
Patron
Joined
Sep 26, 2015
Messages
388
Location
The rich part of Europe
Divinity: Original Sin 2 Bubbles In Memoria A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pathfinder: Kingmaker Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture
Are they. If you don't count expansions, I think they actually have more non-fantasy than fantasy titles. Which is pretty unexpected for an RPG developer if you think about it.

Agreed.
Even their latest game took almost zero fantasy to create.
 
Self-Ejected

Excidium II

Self-Ejected
Joined
Jun 21, 2015
Messages
1,866,227
Location
Third World
Hmmm. If you don't count expansions, I think they actually have more non-fantasy than fantasy titles. Which is pretty unexpected for an RPG developer if you think about it.
It depends on what you consider fantasy. To me Fallout is fantasy just like steampunk is. The difference is that it's retrofuturism from a different era.
Alpha Protocol is their only non-fantasy RPG.
Fantasy is a knight on horseback running around and killing things.
 

Zed

Codex Staff
Patron
Staff Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2002
Messages
17,068
Codex USB, 2014
can't wait to criticize their to-be-announced shit game :positive:
 
Unwanted
Joined
Feb 27, 2016
Messages
110
I was excited for a new announcement... then I read last two pages very briefly. So, do we know for sure that it is going to be an action RPG? Because there is absolutely no place for this shit in a post Dark Souls world for me.
 

Fairfax

Arcane
Joined
Jun 17, 2015
Messages
3,518
I was excited for a new announcement... then I read last two pages very briefly. So, do we know for sure that it is going to be an action RPG? Because there is absolutely no place for this shit in a post Dark Souls world for me.
No. It's just likely to be action/RTwP considering Paradox's track record and the budget range. Turn-based is a very small niche, and this game is a lot more ambitious and expensive than WL2, D:OS, etc.
 

MurkyShadow

Glittering gem of hatred
Patron
Joined
Mar 15, 2012
Messages
355
Location
ye olde europe
Codex 2012 Codex 2013 Codex 2014 PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015 Make the Codex Great Again! Grab the Codex by the pussy Insert Title Here RPG Wokedex Strap Yourselves In Codex+ Now Streaming! Enjoy the Revolution! Another revolution around the sun that is. Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong BattleTech Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. My team has the sexiest and deadliest waifus you can recruit. I helped put crap in Monomyth
I was excited for a new announcement... then I read last two pages very briefly. So, do we know for sure that it is going to be an action RPG? Because there is absolutely no place for this shit in a post Dark Souls world for me.

There's no place for Dark Souls in this world for me. All is well.

First reaction to the announcement:
Obisidian's World of DLCs (official licensed product)
Discarded. Too much edginess in the morning.
 

Fairfax

Arcane
Joined
Jun 17, 2015
Messages
3,518
I was excited for a new announcement... then I read last two pages very briefly. So, do we know for sure that it is going to be an action RPG? Because there is absolutely no place for this shit in a post Dark Souls world for me.

There's no place for Dark Souls in this world for me. All is well.

First reaction to the announcement:
Obisidian's World of DLCs (official licensed product)
Discarded. Too much edginess in the morning.
Oh, that's a given.

Feargus will finally get his "episodic Skyrim". One should expect pre-order DLC, deluxe edition DLC, 8 "expansions", music DLC and art DLC in the first 6 months. And that's just Paradox warming up.
 

Nines

Learned
Joined
Nov 16, 2015
Messages
230
Didn't pdox cancel a viking/norse RPG not too long ago? I wonder if it was a case of product conflict.
I think it was just a shitty idea on itself to procedurally generate everything, including missions. Nothing can replace a touch of a good game designer.

Third person action rpg from a company that has been incapable of developing an action combat system every single time it tried.
Everyone is saying that Alpha Protocol combat is bad, and every time I fail to see what is the difference between this and other third person shooters like Mass Defect. At least it has melee combat and stealth mechanics.
 

Kem0sabe

Arcane
Joined
Mar 7, 2011
Messages
13,207
Location
Azores Islands
Didn't pdox cancel a viking/norse RPG not too long ago? I wonder if it was a case of product conflict.
I think it was just a shitty idea on itself to procedurally generate everything, including missions. Nothing can replace a touch of a good game designer.

Third person action rpg from a company that has been incapable of developing an action combat system every single time it tried.
Everyone is saying that Alpha Protocol combat is bad, and every time I fail to see what is the difference between this and other third person shooters like Mass Defect. At least it has melee combat and stealth mechanics.

Maybe the original ME, the combat in 2 and 3 is worlds better than anything in AP.

AP, New Vegas, DS3, even their rtwp rpg's have notoriously mediocre combat in NWN2 and PoE. Obsidian doesnt do combat very well.
 

Infinitron

I post news
Patron
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
99,599
Codex Year of the Donut Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
I've spoken in the past about how in an alternate universe, Obsidian could have developed into a kind of Telltale Games CYOA company with Chris Avellone in charge as a Ken Levine-style celebrity guru. Of course, the RPG Codex of that alternate universe would have been just as pissed off about them as it is in this one. So be careful what you wish for. By keeping one foot in the world of combat, they ensure that they remain real RPG developers.
 

Nines

Learned
Joined
Nov 16, 2015
Messages
230
Maybe the original ME, the combat in 2 and 3 is worlds better than anything in AP.
AP, New Vegas, DS3, even their rtwp rpg's have notoriously mediocre combat in NWN2 and PoE. Obsidian doesnt do combat very well.
AP2 too could have been better, if an ordinary gamer could see something behind those clunky animations. Eventually it happened, but it was kinda too late. New Vegas has better combat than praised Lolout 3. The same I can say about KotOR 2 vs KotOR. DS3 shouldn't even be on this list. I do agree with NWN2 though, animations were pretty horrible, a step back from KotOR.

Haven't played PoE much. I think it's for the best.

:mca:
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom