Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Pathfinder Pathfinder: Kingmaker Builds and Strats Thread

Parabalus

Arcane
Joined
Mar 23, 2015
Messages
17,503
The most important one is Perception, because that is the one you can't savescum around - because you could never figure you needed it; and because higher game difficultues actually inflate checks.

I can recommend as much as running character with Eyes of the Eagle/+6 Wisdom band + Perception Skill Focus/Jaethal with all that, rest you want later to scout areas for shit you missed or actual world areas for missed locations to enter. It is nice to have +45 Perception already at Armag's tomb lol (Jaethal you best waifu).

How high Perception do you reasonably need? Question of going Rogue vs Knifemaster for the 1/2 level to perception.

Which feats are in the bonus feat pool for e.g. fighters or rangers? Can't seem to find the list, do the icons on the feat icons signify them?

What does Kingdom Management difficulty "Easy, Normal, Hard" do?
 

Shadenuat

Arcane
Joined
Dec 9, 2011
Messages
11,977
Location
Russia
How high Perception do you reasonably need?
It depends on Difficulty too it's hard to say. You just want a specialist. High Wisdom character with +item for Wisdom and maybe Skill Focus (or racial/class bonuses) would do.

Act IV features, for level 12 characters, 35 DC Perception checks I think.
 

Shadenuat

Arcane
Joined
Dec 9, 2011
Messages
11,977
Location
Russia
Here is Sneak level 15 content on Hard enemies have:
u9MELcT.jpg
Also isn't it nice when Evocation spell targets +9 Fortitude instead of +39 Reflex?

Do not be surprised to fail unlocking chests with +40 Trickery later either.
 
Last edited:

Parabalus

Arcane
Joined
Mar 23, 2015
Messages
17,503
Here is Sneak level 15 content on Hard enemies have:
u9MELcT.jpg
Also isn't it nice when Evocation spell targets +9 Fortitude instead of +39 Reflex?


How high Perception do you reasonably need?
It depends on Difficulty too it's hard to say. You just want a specialist. High Wisdom character with +item for Wisdom and maybe Skill Focus (or racial/class bonuses) would do.

Act IV features, for level 12 characters, 35 DC Perception checks I think.

Yeah, I'd def need Trapfinding for the +6 then, just 12 skill +4 Persuasive wouldn't do it, even those are sucky odds.
Can I reliably take the undead inquisitor everywhere for Perception checks? I get for combat, but I don't want to miss out on content.
 

Serus

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Jul 16, 2005
Messages
6,945
Location
Small but great planet of Potatohole
A propos trapfinding. Does it count only rogue levels or charachter levels regardless of class? In other words is it effective with only a dip in rogue? I'm not sure because in case of for example Inquisitor's Stern Gaze it says "half of inquisitor levels" but in case of trapfinding just "half her level". Can anyone clarify?
 

Luckmann

Arcane
Zionist Agent
Joined
Jul 20, 2009
Messages
3,759
Location
Scandinavia
How high Perception do you reasonably need? Question of going Rogue vs Knifemaster for the 1/2 level to perception.
I don't think anyone can reliably answer that question, because we can't see (AFAIK) the Perception tests (edit: for hidden stuff), so we don't even know the rolls we win, let alone fail.

I personally would go for Lvl +8 or so, the +8 being whatever; Skill Focus, Alertness, Ability Score, whatever. I have nothing to back that up with, though.
 

Raghar

Arcane
Vatnik
Joined
Jul 16, 2009
Messages
24,065
A propos trapfinding. Does it count only rogue levels or charachter levels regardless of class? In other words is it effective with only a dip in rogue? I'm not sure because in case of for example Inquisitor's Stern Gaze it says "half of inquisitor levels" but in case of trapfinding just "half her level". Can anyone clarify?
2 INQ and 12 in Fighter would mean +1 and +7.
 

Serus

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Jul 16, 2005
Messages
6,945
Location
Small but great planet of Potatohole
A propos trapfinding. Does it count only rogue levels or charachter levels regardless of class? In other words is it effective with only a dip in rogue? I'm not sure because in case of for example Inquisitor's Stern Gaze it says "half of inquisitor levels" but in case of trapfinding just "half her level". Can anyone clarify?
2 INQ and 12 in Fighter would mean +1 and +7.
So trapfinding counts character level not rogue level. Ok, good to know. Makes rogues a little better option for a dip relative to vivisectionist then. Still if taking only one of the two, mutagen is probably too good to pass.
 

Parabalus

Arcane
Joined
Mar 23, 2015
Messages
17,503
How high Perception do you reasonably need? Question of going Rogue vs Knifemaster for the 1/2 level to perception.
I don't think anyone can reliably answer that question, because we can't see (AFAIK) the Perception tests (edit: for hidden stuff), so we don't even know the rolls we win, let alone fail.

I personally would go for Lvl +8 or so, the +8 being whatever; Skill Focus, Alertness, Ability Score, whatever. I have nothing to back that up with, though.

That seems incredibly low, with what Shadenaut posted above. He needs a DC45 at level 15, for that you'd want +35 modifier AT LEAST, ideally more, so 15 skill points and +20 from other stuff. That's a fucking shitton.

A propos trapfinding. Does it count only rogue levels or charachter levels regardless of class? In other words is it effective with only a dip in rogue? I'm not sure because in case of for example Inquisitor's Stern Gaze it says "half of inquisitor levels" but in case of trapfinding just "half her level". Can anyone clarify?
2 INQ and 12 in Fighter would mean +1 and +7.
So trapfinding counts character level not rogue level. Ok, good to know. Makes rogues a little better option for a dip relative to vivisectionist then. Still if taking only one of the two, mutagen is probably too good to pass.

Is this confirmed? So could I go rogue 1 / knifemaster X and get full trapfinding? Seems wrong.
 

Luckmann

Arcane
Zionist Agent
Joined
Jul 20, 2009
Messages
3,759
Location
Scandinavia
That seems incredibly low, with what Shadenaut posted above. He needs a DC45 at level 15, for that you'd want +35 modifier AT LEAST, ideally more, so 15 skill points and +20 from other stuff. That's a fucking shitton.
That's for being guaranteed to discover certain enemies, on boosted DC:s no less. It's not the same as discovering hidden shit. You won't get a +35 modifier under reliable conditions, just forget about it. At some point, it also becomes prohibitatively "expensive" to invest in something. In no world would I waste two feats for Alertness and Skill Focus, for example.

you can't pick different subclass archetypes

Is this also a PnP restriction? Didn't play PnP Pathfinder.
It's a basic limitation. They're not seperate classes at all. It would be like taking, for example, Rogue 1 over and over again, just switching archetypes. It would be insanely broken to be Rogue 1/Rogue 1/Rogue 1/Rogue 1/etc., racking up the same basic 1st level stuff, just changing archetypes.
 

Andnjord

Arcane
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Messages
3,507
Location
The Eye of Terror
Stats are only important for your advisors.

Your choices are mostly Alignment based. But sometimes you also need to pass Persuasion. However, these checks are hard coded and are not very high, unless it is something crazy like that (Bluff) I am Chosen of God part in Act IV.

You can still pass them by using 0 level cantrip + heroism + Linzi playing etc.

Can you reliably savescum them?
Some are too high to savescum. Like, one I gave example is DC40 (although it lowers through other checks... but then you need to pass these checks too so gg).
That one is actually DC 50 ( at least on hard) and happens to give a motherlode of XP (about 64000) at lvl12-13. The checks to lower are pretty easy though, like 25 diplomacy. I only managed to pass it because my paladin was a dazzling display build (so high charisma, +strength bonus to Intimidate checks, enlarged, item that gave a +5 to intimidate, greater heroism....).

You definitely need a specialist for each skill if you don't want to be triggered by failing them like I am. BUT there is no check that you need to pass to finish the game, you can always resort to Rat Diplomacy or similar.
 

Serus

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Jul 16, 2005
Messages
6,945
Location
Small but great planet of Potatohole
Is it worth dipping for a level of either rogue or vivisectionist for a paladin to get the sneak attack or am I better off just going straight pally?
One level of vivisectionist is 1, and potentially 2 (with the feat) d6 of sneak attack. And the mutagen for the hardest fight of the day is also quite good. And if you got 12 intelligence you should be even able to get 2 level 1 spell slots which includes somewhat useful stuff like enlarge person, shield, cure light wounds. With 1 caster level they wont last long but still better than nothing.
Overall, I think, it's not a bad deal. Hell, 1 level of vivisectionist is probably a good deal for most non-caster builds in this game. Sneak attack is just so easy to get and it adds to almost any damage roll and their dog.
 

Serus

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Jul 16, 2005
Messages
6,945
Location
Small but great planet of Potatohole
That seems incredibly low, with what Shadenaut posted above. He needs a DC45 at level 15, for that you'd want +35 modifier AT LEAST, ideally more, so 15 skill points and +20 from other stuff. That's a fucking shitton.
That's for being guaranteed to discover certain enemies, on boosted DC:s no less. It's not the same as discovering hidden shit. You won't get a +35 modifier under reliable conditions, just forget about it. At some point, it also becomes prohibitatively "expensive" to invest in something. In no world would I waste two feats for Alertness and Skill Focus, for example.

you can't pick different subclass archetypes

Is this also a PnP restriction? Didn't play PnP Pathfinder.
It's a basic limitation. They're not seperate classes at all. It would be like taking, for example, Rogue 1 over and over again, just switching archetypes. It would be insanely broken to be Rogue 1/Rogue 1/Rogue 1/Rogue 1/etc., racking up the same basic 1st level stuff, just changing archetypes.

Except for the zero BAB. Guys I have 15 levels of level 1 rogue and 15d6 Sneak attack but a BAB of zero. What do I win? Tard Olympics.
Think about full BAB classes then and the original argument stands.
Also the point is that it would be potentially unbalanced to get all the level 1 features from all archetypes in one class. They simply weren't designed with that in mind. And all that with only 3 archetypes per class as we have in the computer game now. There are potentially many times more.
 
Last edited:

J1M

Arcane
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
14,739
Is it worth dipping for a level of either rogue or vivisectionist for a paladin to get the sneak attack or am I better off just going straight pally?
Compare the level 20 benefit to the other class' level 1 benefit.
 

toro

Arcane
Vatnik
Joined
Apr 14, 2009
Messages
14,785
Is it worth dipping for a level of either rogue or vivisectionist for a paladin to get the sneak attack or am I better off just going straight pally?
Compare the level 20 benefit to the other class' level 1 benefit.

Everybody is obsessed with cross-breeding and in the end they will end up with some mongrel build. Fuck it.
 

Luckmann

Arcane
Zionist Agent
Joined
Jul 20, 2009
Messages
3,759
Location
Scandinavia
Is it worth dipping for a level of either rogue or vivisectionist for a paladin to get the sneak attack or am I better off just going straight pally?
Compare the level 20 benefit to the other class' level 1 benefit.
Bad way to think about it. Lvl 20 is a capstone that doesn't even come into play, whereas a lvl 1 dip is active from the second you take it until the credits roll. PF:s obsession with capstones of various kinds - both in the TTPnP and in this here CRPG - is a cancer and a trap.
That seems incredibly low, with what Shadenaut posted above. He needs a DC45 at level 15, for that you'd want +35 modifier AT LEAST, ideally more, so 15 skill points and +20 from other stuff. That's a fucking shitton.
That's for being guaranteed to discover certain enemies, on boosted DC:s no less. It's not the same as discovering hidden shit. You won't get a +35 modifier under reliable conditions, just forget about it. At some point, it also becomes prohibitatively "expensive" to invest in something. In no world would I waste two feats for Alertness and Skill Focus, for example.

you can't pick different subclass archetypes

Is this also a PnP restriction? Didn't play PnP Pathfinder.
It's a basic limitation. They're not seperate classes at all. It would be like taking, for example, Rogue 1 over and over again, just switching archetypes. It would be insanely broken to be Rogue 1/Rogue 1/Rogue 1/Rogue 1/etc., racking up the same basic 1st level stuff, just changing archetypes.

Except for the zero BAB. Guys I have 15 levels of level 1 rogue and 15d6 Sneak attack but a BAB of zero. What do I win? Tard Olympics.
Not if you're running Fractional BAB, the only right way to play. :smug:
 

J1M

Arcane
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
14,739
How do other people rate Power Attack? -1 attack for +3 damage seems okay, but when it scales to -5 attack for +15 damage it looks rather poor.
 

J1M

Arcane
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
14,739
How do other people rate Power Attack? -1 attack for +3 damage seems okay, but when it scales to -5 attack for +15 damage it looks rather poor.
use 2-handers
do 160 damage crits
whaznot to like
Assuming you are taking a weapon with a good crit range, only 30 of that 160 is from power attack? Legitimate question: wouldn't hitting more often be better?
 

Yosharian

Arcane
Joined
May 28, 2018
Messages
10,437
Location
Grand Chien
Is it worth dipping for a level of either rogue or vivisectionist for a paladin to get the sneak attack or am I better off just going straight pally?
Compare the level 20 benefit to the other class' level 1 benefit.
That's not really accurate, because dipping one level of X gives you that advantage immediately, whereas the level 20 benefit will only be gotten for the last few hours of the game.

It's more accurate to say that you need to compare the advantage of dipping X to delaying all your main class' abilities by one level.
 

Yosharian

Arcane
Joined
May 28, 2018
Messages
10,437
Location
Grand Chien
How do other people rate Power Attack? -1 attack for +3 damage seems okay, but when it scales to -5 attack for +15 damage it looks rather poor.
use 2-handers
do 160 damage crits
whaznot to like
Assuming you are taking a weapon with a good crit range, only 30 of that 160 is from power attack? Legitimate question: wouldn't hitting more often be better?
You can see a good analysis of 2H and TWF feats here:

https://rpgwillikers.wordpress.com/2016/08/20/feats-of-fury/

Note: 'these feats' refers to Power Attack, and 'EDV' is 'Expected Damage Value':

Against an average AC, these feats are always worthwhile in and of themselves. At level 4, even one-handed we get a 22% damage increase over baseline, and a whopping 58% increase against DR. These percentages are even better when two-handing.

The behavior of the feat is a bit strange from here, however. We see the % increase to EDV shrink over time against no DR (only 12% by level 8, and a mere 5% by level 12), but skyrocket against level-appropriate DR (140% at level 8, a whopping 424% by level 12). This basically affirms the old rule-of-thumb that +1 attack is roughly worth +2 damage, as over time the difference between power attacking and not seems to approach 0…except for DR. Our average damage without Power Attack falls closer and closer to being entirely negated by enemy DR as time goes on, so putting a decent amount of damage on top means that even if we hit more rarely, its to our net benefit because we actually accomplish something when we do connect. I should also note that if a character has significantly better attack modifiers than my baseline, the benefits of Power Attack to EDV are even more noticeable, even against non-DR opponents.

Two-handing weapons also increases the utility of Power Attack into mid and high level play. At level 12, a two-handed power attack gives us 40% more EDV than a single-handed non-power attack, and a massive 880% increase against DR 15.
 

J1M

Arcane
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
14,739
Is it worth dipping for a level of either rogue or vivisectionist for a paladin to get the sneak attack or am I better off just going straight pally?
Compare the level 20 benefit to the other class' level 1 benefit.
That's not really accurate, because dipping one level of X gives you that advantage immediately, whereas the level 20 benefit will only be gotten for the last few hours of the game.

It's more accurate to say that you need to compare the advantage of dipping X to delaying all your main class' abilities by one level.
Since many people seem eager to jump all over this, I was responding to this individual. Those of you sophisticated enough to know where this advice does not apply are not the target audience.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom