Jezal_k23
Guest
Can someone please recommend me some powerful spells/combos that wizards, druids or ciphers have? My last playthrough was done relatively blindly and I feel I wasn't creative with what I can do with my spellcasters.
I think the game would be most enjoyable without a Cipher and Priest in your party
Another way to balance these out is by removing grazes from the equation. When you're assured to prone for half base time +36% (thanks to heroic intellect), you're basically assured to hit all the time, which made these aoe(enemy) spells so damn good in the first one.In fact, shit like Slicken should come with -5 ACC modifier, etc.
For Wizards I'd recommend avoiding all their direct damage spells (which are garbage, especially compared to priest) and focus on disruption. In my experience Confusion is the most useful Wizard spell, followed by Shadowflame (obtainable in WM1) and Enervating Terror. What makes Confusion strong is the very thing discussed above - even a graze will flip your target, and even the target that just decides to do nothing will be targeted by allies. Sneaking up on a group of enemies and opening up with Confusion trivializes many fights, because it gives you ample time to buff up and choose your targets while enemies unload all their most dangerous abilities on each other. Shadowflame is instant cast mass paralyze, so that's obviously very strong too. Enervating terror is just a good genral purpose debuff that stacks well with other good debuffs, all in big area and for a long period of time.Can someone please recommend me some powerful spells/combos that wizards, druids or ciphers have? My last playthrough was done relatively blindly and I feel I wasn't creative with what I can do with my spellcasters.
I must not know how to play with ciphers because they aren't so overpowered that you destroy everything. They're the definition of glass canon. I have to micromanage with GM. It's fun, though. I don't feel like they're so overpowered like mages in Baldur's Gate, but yea, GM is a fucking beast in terms of damage and cc. I can still die if I hit an area at a low level, though. I went into White March with a level 6 or level 7 party with GM and still got wiped out. Had to wait until level 8 to where I could actually kill the first boss encounter. Playing PoTD, by the way.Currently got myself (ranger), Eder, Aloth, Durance, Hiravias and Kana, playing on PotD. Acquired GM, but I didn't know whether to use her or not. If ciphers are that OP then I might not. Will think about getting rid of Durance.
Otherwise, yeah, many spells for all classes are overshadowed by just a few which are more useful in 99% of situations
How do you guys stay on top of all these learnings?
Josh: Well, one of the things we’re working on integrating now is telemetrics. So, there’s a lot of subjective stuff you can get from observing Twitch and YouTube, and while we haven’t done it in a while, we do occasionally invite people in to play the game and then we’re in another room watching the feed. You can get a lot out of that. But telemetrics allow you to sort so much data from a larger pool – it goes beyond the anecdote of an individual player’s experience and you see a lot of patterns emerge, such as things they miss, or drop, what chests they open or don’t open, what paths they take through and in what order, did they notice a secret door, where they stop, or where they die, or where they quit playing. There’s all sorts of things that we can get out of that.
It’s not something that Obsidian has a ton of experience doing, but we’re realizing increasingly that there’s a lot of data that you can’t even get through polls. Polls, in a lot of cases, involves a specific community and a very specific type of player. I remember talking to a guy who did brand management for Lucasfilm, and he said, “who would you guess is the most popular character in the prequel movies?”. And I said, “I dunno, maybe like Jango Fett or someone like that?” and he said, “it’s Jar Jar Binks.” I said, “there’s no way” but he told me that if you go online and look at forums, then the answer you’ll get is that it’s never going to be Jar Jar Binks, but when you ask people anonymously in a different context outside of a community setting, a lot of people will then go for Jar Jar – often it’s kids or people who feel intimidated by online communities.
So it’s not that that’s the case with Pillars characters or anything, but what people tend to do versus what they say, especially within a community, can be very different, and telemetrics can tell a different story. It’s not that one story is the whole picture – it’s a matter of just getting more insight into informing our understanding of how people actually use the games that we make.
Interesting read, but it raises some red flags.
Josh's talk about Jar Jar makes me concerned that Obsidian's aim is to analyze and actively pander to the preferences of average mainstream customers, which inevitably leads formulatic garbage à la Marvel movies.