Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Eternity Pillars of Eternity + The White March Expansion Thread

Orud

Scholar
Patron
Joined
May 2, 2021
Messages
1,131
Strap Yourselves In Codex Year of the Donut Codex+ Now Streaming!
The combat is interesting because buffing all the time is gay and boring. I'm not sure how great it is in the end but it is something. I am glad it exists. Then again I am not a Dungeons and Dragons fanboy.

Sure, but at the same time we lost the ability to use invisibility outside of combat. Want to cast an invisibility spell to steal some shit right in front of someone or get into a better position? Not possible.

Same with kiting or laying more than 1 trap. It might be lame, but people should be able to tackle a fight the way they want (or add mechanics that do not allow reloading while moving for example). In PoE however, it's not possible since enemies will reset to their original position if you kite them far enough.
 

Bigg Boss

Arcane
Joined
Sep 23, 2012
Messages
7,528
The combat is interesting because buffing all the time is gay and boring. I'm not sure how great it is in the end but it is something. I am glad it exists. Then again I am not a Dungeons and Dragons fanboy.

Sure, but at the same time we lost the ability to use invisibility outside of combat. Want to cast an invisibility spell to steal some shit right in front of someone or get into a better position? Not possible.

Same with kiting or laying more than 1 trap. It might be lame, but people should be able to tackle a fight the way they want (or add mechanics that do not allow reloading while moving for example). In PoE however, it's not possible since enemies will reset to their original position if you kite them far enough.

Agreed.
 

CthuluIsSpy

Arcane
Joined
Dec 26, 2014
Messages
8,692
Location
On the internet, writing shit posts.
The combat is interesting because buffing all the time is gay and boring. I'm not sure how great it is in the end but it is something. I am glad it exists. Then again I am not a Dungeons and Dragons fanboy.

Sure, but at the same time we lost the ability to use invisibility outside of combat. Want to cast an invisibility spell to steal some shit right in front of someone or get into a better position? Not possible.

Same with kiting or laying more than 1 trap. It might be lame, but people should be able to tackle a fight the way they want (or add mechanics that do not allow reloading while moving for example). In PoE however, it's not possible since enemies will reset to their original position if you kite them far enough.
I found it really annoying that I couldn't apply cleric buffs out of combat. It made some encounters a lot harder than they needed to be as if you got hit by an earlier dominate before you can cast that spell that prevents it you're pretty much screwed.
It felt like a really forced way to introduce difficulty.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
50,754
Codex Year of the Donut
Sure, but at the same time we lost the ability to use invisibility outside of combat. Want to cast an invisibility spell to steal some shit right in front of someone or get into a better position? Not possible.
It's because magic is the most underbaked part of the entire generic forgotten realms knockoff setting which is really impressive.
 

Nano

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Mar 6, 2016
Messages
4,817
Grab the Codex by the pussy Strap Yourselves In Enjoy the Revolution! Another revolution around the sun that is.
Favorite part of the Od Nua dungeon was the text event where you bathed in a tub of blood and bones and it was all described in lavish detail. Got me hard tbh.

Then I proceeded to get anal raped by the Drake living there. That part kinda put a damper on it.
 

AwesomeButton

Proud owner of BG 3: Day of Swen's Tentacle
Patron
Joined
Nov 23, 2014
Messages
17,126
Location
At large
PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015 Make the Codex Great Again! Grab the Codex by the pussy Insert Title Here RPG Wokedex Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. Pathfinder: Wrath
Endless Paths is one of the worst and most superfluous dungeons in RPG history. Inexcusable and a clear example of Kickstarter incentives directly wasting resources on nonsense
Well, what did I say about insufficient resources?
 

Haplo

Prophet
Patron
Joined
Sep 14, 2016
Messages
6,563
Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire
I was in partial agreement at least but then....
I found Wasteland 2's or Shadowrun's combat system to be more interesting for that reason, as whilst you do have spells in Shadowrun, they are not as powerful as in Pillars and you still have to use conventional tactics.

Ok, that's a REALLY low bar. I found the combat in Pillars WAY better then those 2. Particularly way above WL2, which is extremely bare-bones. Other then the different gun types, what tactical options do you have? To crouch (if you find a free spot on the map), to burst or take an aimed shot that will not matter at all?
 

Haplo

Prophet
Patron
Joined
Sep 14, 2016
Messages
6,563
Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire
Same as with Fort Deadlight in Deadfire, they frontload the best dungeon right at the start while everything else is shitty until the DLCs.

Fort Deadlight is great indeed, but I would not say other areas are shitty. I mean sure, thee are plenty of tiny, focused areas, almost like most Kingmaker exploration locations. But plenty of solid ones too.
 

Parabalus

Arcane
Joined
Mar 23, 2015
Messages
17,510
Endless paths is great if you do them in one-go.

I was in partial agreement at least but then....
I found Wasteland 2's or Shadowrun's combat system to be more interesting for that reason, as whilst you do have spells in Shadowrun, they are not as powerful as in Pillars and you still have to use conventional tactics.

Ok, that's a REALLY low bar. I found the combat in Pillars WAY better then those 2. Particularly way above WL2, which is extremely bare-bones. Other then the different gun types, what tactical options do you have? To crouch (if you find a free spot on the map), to burst or take an aimed shot that will not matter at all?

WL2 combat is complete trash. Shadowrun is decent in the beginning, but it has UI and animation problems that keep it from being great. Late-game it degenerates a lot.
 

Grunker

RPG Codex Ghost
Patron
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
27,765
Location
Copenhagen
^ agree about WL2, the fake news is for scandalous endless paths comment. don't defend that absolute trash

World, story, role playing options. It's a big and detailed world they made, full of neat questlines that do have consequences, and I found it interesting.
You are one of the only five (5) people in the world to hold this opinion. But hey, you do you, I like a rebel.

him, sawyer and who else
 

Grunker

RPG Codex Ghost
Patron
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
27,765
Location
Copenhagen
Endless Paths is one of the worst and most superfluous dungeons in RPG history. Inexcusable and a clear example of Kickstarter incentives directly wasting resources on nonsense
Well, what did I say about insufficient resources?

Huh? I think you might have misread my whole argument in that discussion :)

Again, what I'm saying boils down to: no, PoE does not have less content than BG1 - it just squanders a lot of them on useless nonsense and poor structure.
 

Lyric Suite

Converting to Islam
Joined
Mar 23, 2006
Messages
58,301
Almost done with the hold.

So this is the best dungeon in the game, huh?

It's not bad, but it ain't no Durlag's Tower, that's for sure. Not even remotely close. I also think i should have grabbed Kana before coming here as it's taking me too long to clear it. Every fight is the same but takes a long time and i have to rest every two or three fights as i need all my spells to mow those bastards down, but mostly it's because once i deplete that spell Aloth has that scatters all the mobs around with charm i'm basically fucked as the AI swarms by back line every single time and there's nothing else i can do to stop them.

You should rest at most once or twice for the entire hold. Are you running back to an inn for supplies?

It'll ruin the game, don't spam rest.

I always try to rest as little as possible, but once Eder is in the red and i got no spells left i don't have much of a choice.

And no, i'm not going back to the inn. The priest in the second floor lets me rest.
 
Last edited:

AwesomeButton

Proud owner of BG 3: Day of Swen's Tentacle
Patron
Joined
Nov 23, 2014
Messages
17,126
Location
At large
PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015 Make the Codex Great Again! Grab the Codex by the pussy Insert Title Here RPG Wokedex Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. Pathfinder: Wrath
Huh? I think you might have misread my whole argument in that discussion :)

Again, what I'm saying boils down to: no, PoE does not have less content than BG1 - it just squanders a lot of them on useless nonsense and poor structure.
Well you did say a lot of other things. Specifically that you disagree with me on PoE's lacking the people-and-money resources to bring about the same experience as BG/BG2. Disagreeing with that is different than the limited statement "PoE does not have less content than BG1", although I would contest that too, but it's a different subject.

EDIT: Even developers in their retrospectives have outright stated they've underestimated parts of the game - namely the stronghold.

And I'll repeat again - when you set out to check off kickstarter promises, you inevitably end up with something differing from your vision for the game.
 

Parabalus

Arcane
Joined
Mar 23, 2015
Messages
17,510
^ agree about WL2, the fake news is for scandalous endless paths comment. don't defend that absolute trash

World, story, role playing options. It's a big and detailed world they made, full of neat questlines that do have consequences, and I found it interesting.
You are one of the only five (5) people in the world to hold this opinion. But hey, you do you, I like a rebel.

him, sawyer and who else

It's a huge, non-linear dungeon with several secrets and quests. What's so horrible about it?

It even has deep ties to the lore and the stronghold mechanics.

Durlag's comparison aside, I didn't find it to be much below the rest of PoE.

Almost done with the hold.

So this is the best dungeon in the game, huh?

It's not bad, but it ain't no Durlag's Tower, that's for sure. Not even remotely close. I also think i should have grabbed Kana before coming here as it's taking me too long to clear it. Every fight is the same but takes a long time and i have to rest every two or three fights as i need all my spells to mow those bastards down, but mostly it's because once i deplete that spell Aloth has that scatters all the mobs around with charm i'm basically fucked as the AI swarms by back line every single time and there's nothing else i can do to stop them.

You should rest at most once or twice for the entire hold. Are you running back to an inn for supplies?

It'll ruin the game, don't spam rest.

I always try to rest as little as possible, but once Eder is in the red and i got no spells left i don't have much of a choice.

And no, i'm not going back to the inn. The priest in the second floor lets me rest.

Ah, great catch with the priest, forgot about him.

I found that a good way to pace yourself is to use only looted camping supplies, and never buy them. Sawyer spread them around quite well, so when you pick one up it's a good rest signal.
 
Last edited:

Lyric Suite

Converting to Islam
Joined
Mar 23, 2006
Messages
58,301
Yeah, i'm doing the same with the camping supplies.

I think i'm just struggling a bit because i don't have a full party yet and i'm also lucking some dps. I suppose i could have taken some mercenaries but ho well.
 

Grunker

RPG Codex Ghost
Patron
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
27,765
Location
Copenhagen
Huh? I think you might have misread my whole argument in that discussion :)

Again, what I'm saying boils down to: no, PoE does not have less content than BG1 - it just squanders a lot of them on useless nonsense and poor structure.
Well you did say a lot of other things. Specifically that you disagree with me on PoE's lacking the people-and-money resources to bring about the same experience as BG/BG2.

Maybe it's just me who's slow, but I really don't get where we disagree. Obviously they had the people-and-money resources to bring the same experience - they squandered it on useless stuff like Endless Paths!
 

Grunker

RPG Codex Ghost
Patron
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
27,765
Location
Copenhagen
^ agree about WL2, the fake news is for scandalous endless paths comment. don't defend that absolute trash

World, story, role playing options. It's a big and detailed world they made, full of neat questlines that do have consequences, and I found it interesting.
You are one of the only five (5) people in the world to hold this opinion. But hey, you do you, I like a rebel.

him, sawyer and who else

It's a huge, non-linear dungeon with several secrets and quests. What's so horrible about it?

It's a samey copypasta-machine full of almost entirely uninteresting encounters and with no unique theme. Compare it to Durlag's or Watcher's and it is obvious how terrible it is - but even in isolation I don't imagine how anyone could derive much enjoyment from what is essentially just monster-dumps of poorly thought-out encounters and a minimum of lip service paid to a marginal amount of non-combat stuff.
 
Last edited:

Ninjerk

Arcane
Joined
Jul 10, 2013
Messages
14,323
There is something oddly satisfying about using an invisibility spell to scout out future encounters more-or-less free of danger and especially satisfying in the superiority of invisibility+trap disarming over stealth (which breaks)+trap disarming. The player feels clever for having recognized and taken adavntage of the difference. (apologies if I'm not clear, I'm quite drunk atm).
 

Orud

Scholar
Patron
Joined
May 2, 2021
Messages
1,131
Strap Yourselves In Codex Year of the Donut Codex+ Now Streaming!
It's a huge, non-linear dungeon with several secrets and quests. What's so horrible about it?

The problem is that you need to break up your progression through it ad-hoc. It was specifically designed that way; you're supposed to delve deeper into it until you hit a brick wall difficulty wise, and then later return when you've grown in strength.

The problem I have with that is that there is no clear guideline on when to return and it interrupts the flow of the rest of the game later on (because it's there is no reason, related to the rest of the game, to ever head back). In addition, if you hold off until you're strong enough to do it in one go, you'll basically overpower most of the dungeon to the point where there is no challenge at all.

I wouldn't have minded it so much if it was a self-contained package that you could undertake in one go once you're strong enough to start it. In addition its progression structure (both in player power and enemy encounter difficulty) should be self sufficient, allowing you to progress through it by simply playing the dungeon.
 
Last edited:

CthuluIsSpy

Arcane
Joined
Dec 26, 2014
Messages
8,692
Location
On the internet, writing shit posts.
I was in partial agreement at least but then....
I found Wasteland 2's or Shadowrun's combat system to be more interesting for that reason, as whilst you do have spells in Shadowrun, they are not as powerful as in Pillars and you still have to use conventional tactics.

Ok, that's a REALLY low bar. I found the combat in Pillars WAY better then those 2. Particularly way above WL2, which is extremely bare-bones. Other then the different gun types, what tactical options do you have? To crouch (if you find a free spot on the map), to burst or take an aimed shot that will not matter at all?
True, WL2's combat isn't great, but you still have to make use of cover and flanking which is a little more interesting than just spamming spells.
In Pillars I found that most fights just devolved to "use tank and summons to hold them in place in a choke point, paralyze paralyze nuke nuke"
Mechanically you do have some nice abilities and I did like some ideas, such as the engagement mechanic and expendable summons to even the odds and flank numerically superior foes, but in terms of tactics I found it to be rather limiting in most encounters.

That said, the Thaos boss fight was fairly tactical as you did have to pay attention to position and couldn't just trap him in a choke point and chain stun him. The constant full self-heals was a little much though.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
50,754
Codex Year of the Donut
There is something oddly satisfying about using an invisibility spell to scout out future encounters more-or-less free of danger and especially satisfying in the superiority of invisibility+trap disarming over stealth (which breaks)+trap disarming. The player feels clever for having recognized and taken adavntage of the difference. (apologies if I'm not clear, I'm quite drunk atm).
Making the player feel clever because they discovered something vs being handed it is something that is completely lost in modern cRPGs.
Compare how skills are used in Fallout to Fallout clones. In Fallout, you use the skill on objects in the world. In the clones, you just "talk" to the object(only the ones you can use a skill on are able to be "talked" to) and either automatically use the correct skill or select a dialogue option to do so.
Narrowing magic and reducing the ways it can be used to interact with the world is just a natural extension of this, makes the game easier for developers/designers but shit for players.
 

CthuluIsSpy

Arcane
Joined
Dec 26, 2014
Messages
8,692
Location
On the internet, writing shit posts.
It's a huge, non-linear dungeon with several secrets and quests. What's so horrible about it?

The problem is that you need to break up your progression through it ad-hoc. It was specifically designed that way; you're supposed to delve deeper into it until you hit a brick wall difficulty wise, and then later return when you've grown in strength.

The problem I have with that is that there is no clear guideline on when to return and it interrupts the flow of the rest of the game later on (because it's there is no reason, related to the rest of the game, to ever head back). In addition, if you hold off until you're strong enough to do it in one go, you'll basically overpower most of the dungeon to the point where there is no challenge at all.

I wouldn't have minded it so much if it was a self-contained package that you could undertake in one go once you're strong enough to start it. In addition its progression structure (both in player power and enemy encounter difficulty) should be self sufficient, allowing you to progress through it by simply playing the dungeon.
There's even a point where you can't actually go back safely; on floor 12 its really easy to find yourself in an impossible situation, as there's 2 paths. One path has a really hard death ring trap. The other path has brambles you can't back track out of, and if you want to backtrack to resupply you have to fight a fairly difficult encounter and go through the trap. It isn't great.
 
Last edited:

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom