mediocrepoet
Philosoraptor in Residence
Who fucking plays POE for the writing?
Kek. You have my condolences if you play this for the combat.
Your family has mine if you play this for the writing. You probably eat cardboard for fun too.
Who fucking plays POE for the writing?
Kek. You have my condolences if you play this for the combat.
He's got the point though, if anything, the major criticism throughout the years was how combat and itemization have been so oversawyered the builds barely matter.
They're talking about Path of Exile. ... Can't tell if you're serious or trolling now.Just saw a Steam review for something called Last Epoch which said "its like poe but you can play it without google and spreadsheets"
Off topic - anyone else think Little Caeser’s pizza taste worse than cardboard?Who fucking plays POE for the writing?
Kek. You have my condolences if you play this for the combat.
Your family has mine if you play this for the writing. You probably eat cardboard for fun too.
They're talking about Path of Exile. ... Can't tell if you're serious or trolling now.Just saw a Steam review for something called Last Epoch which said "its like poe but you can play it without google and spreadsheets"
Even though that's true (the systems are not complex), the IE games' thrill of "little paperdolls swinging at each other" and "whether or not yours gets hit, or hits respectively", is more fun than PoE's combat. One is like watching a slot machine roll, the other is an exercise in matching attack damage type vs defense type.And yet the 2nd ed. DnD games had very primitive systems, outside of caster characters. The spellcasting systems were admittedly great. But all the other classes - just sad. Point and clik. Or worse yet, kite.
Also next to no choice in character building: max your casting or damage stat, that's it!
PoE is so much better then this. As well as 3rd+ ed. and Pathfinder games...
Excel sheets are for grown ups IMO.Slot machines and color matching - which is for grown ups and which is for children?And yet the 2nd ed. DnD games had very primitive systems, outside of caster characters. The spellcasting systems were admittedly great. But all the other classes - just sad. Point and clik. Or worse yet, kite.
Also next to no choice in character building: max your casting or damage stat, that's it!
PoE is so much better then this. As well as 3rd+ ed. and Pathfinder games...
Probably, for grown ups who come home from work to play games about color matching, for "fun".Excel sheets are for grown ups IMO.Slot machines and color matching - which is for grown ups and which is for children?And yet the 2nd ed. DnD games had very primitive systems, outside of caster characters. The spellcasting systems were admittedly great. But all the other classes - just sad. Point and clik. Or worse yet, kite.
Also next to no choice in character building: max your casting or damage stat, that's it!
PoE is so much better then this. As well as 3rd+ ed. and Pathfinder games...
Six rangers, all with the same pets.Greetings,
I feel like replaying PoEI and figured a six-X party would be a nice change (X being a given class).
What are some of the most interesting six-X combinations ? I'd preferably not have to spam figurine-summons every fight but if it is what it is, then it is.
edit : btw I intend to play on hard, not potd.
In this context, nothing really matters, go with whatever you want.edit : btw I intend to play on hard, not potd.
To me fantasy is about magic. If I don't want magic I play a game in a magic free setting like Fallout. I don't really care about mundane characters in a fantasy setting. They are the supporting cast for the spellcasters, like grogs in Ars Magica. That's all. Swords and shields are not supposed to have a hundred options. You block or you swing.
There's only one answer:Greetings,
I feel like replaying PoEI and figured a six-X party would be a nice change (X being a given class).
What are some of the most interesting six-X combinations ? I'd preferably not have to spam figurine-summons every fight but if it is what it is, then it is.
edit : btw I intend to play on hard, not potd.
In any case modern fantasy and CRPGs are much more heavily based on Jack Vance and not Tolkien. Vance's Dying Earth setting, like Harry Potter's Wizarding World, makes for a much more magical and thus better game setting than Tolkien's. More spells, more magic items, more monsters, more everything that is fun. I love LotR but consider it an anemic setting for fantasy gaming due to the tiny bestiary and general lack of tactical magic.