DragoFireheart
all caps, rainbow colors, SOMETHING.
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2007
- Messages
- 23,731
Holy shit there are xboneheads on the codex?
I own a 360 (if that counts).
Holy shit there are xboneheads on the codex?
The servers won't get shut down. It's the benefit of the cloud. There are no physical dedicated servers that need to be repurposed or shut down.I like the part where he says "so the concern is one day servers shut down or you get banned and all these games are unplayable. Fair enough, but..."
Let's just toss that concern aside like it means nothing.
The servers won't get shut down. It's the benefit of the cloud. There are no physical dedicated servers that need to be repurposed or shut down.
The servers won't get shut down. It's the benefit of the cloud. There are no physical dedicated servers that need to be repurposed or shut down.
So what does it run on, magic pixie dust?
The servers won't get shut down. It's the benefit of the cloud. There are no physical dedicated servers that need to be repurposed or shut down.
So what does it run on, magic pixie dust?
No it runs off the cloud.
The cloud. The cloud will not shut down, unless MS magically goes under. Dedicated servers to games that aren't being played anymore is completely different and will naturally get shut down - it's the entire reason the console generation was stuck with P2P.The servers won't get shut down. It's the benefit of the cloud. There are no physical dedicated servers that need to be repurposed or shut down.
So what does it run on, magic pixie dust?
M$ could still offer everything they advertised orriginally without any online DRM. DRM is not required for that shit to function at all. The xbone might actually be "underselling its value" in that case.
So you're saying Azure will shut down at the end of the console generation? Fuck man, just think a bit.I sometimes seriously wonder if people actually think "the cloud" is something that doesn't need to be instantiated in physical hardware but is instead some kind of magic.
So you're saying Azure will shut down at the end of the console generation? Fuck man, just think a bit.I sometimes seriously wonder if people actually think "the cloud" is something that doesn't need to be instantiated in physical hardware but is instead some kind of magic.
They'll just spin up when there is demand. Older games will naturally have less demand (both in number of connections and bandwidth) and newer hardware on the cloud will deal with it even easier than before - keeping Moore's law in mind and so on. There is no effective reasoning to stop the ability of the cloud to provide a virtual dedicated server for a decade old game on the fly, when required. Unless your end reasoning is "fuck the consumer," which admittedly some people seem to think is the ideologue of most corporations.So you're saying Azure will shut down at the end of the console generation? Fuck man, just think a bit.I sometimes seriously wonder if people actually think "the cloud" is something that doesn't need to be instantiated in physical hardware but is instead some kind of magic.
No, I'm saying that even virtual servers in the cloud take up physical resources. Which is ultimately limited. Having them on Azure doesn't mean they won't get shut down when they stop being cost effective.
The cloud. The cloud will not shut down, unless MS magically goes under. Dedicated servers to games that aren't being played anymore is completely different and will naturally get shut down - it's the entire reason the console generation was stuck with P2P.The servers won't get shut down. It's the benefit of the cloud. There are no physical dedicated servers that need to be repurposed or shut down.
So what does it run on, magic pixie dust?
They'll just spin up when there is demand. Older games will naturally have less demand (both in number of connections and bandwidth) and newer hardware on the cloud will deal with it even easier than before - keeping Moore's law in mind and so in. There is no effective reasoning to stop the ability of the cloud to provide a virtual dedicated server for a decade old game on the fly, when required. Unless your end reasoning is "fuck the consumer," which obviously some people seem to think is the ideologue of most corporations.
No, but you clearly are.The cloud. The cloud will not shut down, unless MS magically goes under. Dedicated servers to games that aren't being played anymore is completely different and will naturally get shut down - it's the entire reason the console generation was stuck with P2P.The servers won't get shut down. It's the benefit of the cloud. There are no physical dedicated servers that need to be repurposed or shut down.
So what does it run on, magic pixie dust?
Fuck, I was being sarcastic. Are you seriously this fucking dumb?
Did you just fucking use "xD"?Don't argue with IDtenT , he'll just beat you with stupidity. xD
He already admitted he was trolling anyway saying it's "all in the name" (ID10T)
You just need to look at EAs server shutdown list and it paints a pretty clear picture
http://www.ea.com/1/service-updates
Or the dozens or so of failed MMORPGs that are forever silenced or only live on in server emulation projects.
I asked that fucking mongoloid when his Doritos hat would arrive...
They'll just spin up when there is demand. Older games will naturally have less demand (both in number of connections and bandwidth) and newer hardware on the cloud will deal with it even easier than before - keeping Moore's law in mind and so in. There is no effective reasoning to stop the ability of the cloud to provide a virtual dedicated server for a decade old game on the fly, when required. Unless your end reasoning is "fuck the consumer," which admittedly some people seem to think is the ideologue of most corporations.No, I'm saying that even virtual servers in the cloud take up physical resources. Which is ultimately limited. Having them on Azure doesn't mean they won't get shut down when they stop being cost effective.
Yes I did, and it wouldn't be the first time: http://www.rpgcodex.net/forums/index.php?search/25144818/&q=xD&o=date&c[node]=16&c[user][0]=13348Did you just fucking use "xD"?