Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Return To Monkey Island - MI2 sequel from Ron Gilbert

WallaceChambers

Learned
Joined
Jul 29, 2019
Messages
311
Interview with Ron & Dave on adventure gamers + screenshots

gNi22a6.png
f5wwwfV.png
vn7HlC2.png
1Va019D.png
 

Boleskine

Arcane
Joined
Sep 12, 2013
Messages
4,045
The problem with ToMI (at least the first episode which I played) is the same problem with Telltale's Sam & Max games. They're boring.

The Sam & Max games especially felt like a slog at times. Back to the Future had the same feeling. They weren't bad games by any means, but once you get over the novelty of "It's a new ___ game!" it feels like a pale imitation of the original thing.

Again, I only played the first episode of ToMI but I remember being bored out of my mind and not feeling the charm and wit of the original games. I had the same feeling with the Sam & Max games.
 

WallaceChambers

Learned
Joined
Jul 29, 2019
Messages
311
First episode of Tales is solid, the 2nd is the weakest in the season, but after that it's some of my favorite Monkey Island and overall the game is great IMO.
 

MRY

Wormwood Studios
Developer
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
5,718
Location
California
Single biggest news is that they promise a 2022 release, barring "catastrophe." I hadn't seen that before, though probably I just wasn't paying enough attention.

That said, they seem to be coy about just how much of an adventure it will be:
Evolving things, evolving the franchise, embracing new audiences—all these things, those are the big questions that we needed to ask ourselves.

It’s going to be a pirate adventure?

Dave: It is a game about pirates.

Point-and-click?

Ron: There is pointing and clicking. That is true. [laughs] Interface-wise, this one does other things, you know—[we’re] having fun and advancing things. It’s obviously not the seven- or nine-verb interface .... An important part of this, in some ways, is keeping and evolving the genre. Not letting it get static, saying, “Well, that’s what we did thirty years ago, so that’s exactly how we’re going to do it these days.”
I'm not sure the sentiment is wrong, but it pairs oddly with a product that exists solely because of nostalgia. Thimbleweed Park had pixel art and its UI because, as a non-franchise game, if it hadn't been explicitly imitative of the look of Maniac Mansion and Zak McKracken, no one would've recognized it as important. Here, the Monkey Island brand is sufficiently strong that they can vary from the visual style and interface and still sell it as "relive your childhood even though you're a weary old man." But the predicate reason for making Return to Monkey Island -- "the real sequel to a game that came out in 1991" -- is to sell what is old, rather than letting it make way for something new, because it's easier to sell what is old. (As a retro-guy myself, that certainly makes me glad!) Anyway, given the Return to Monkey Island's raison d'être, it seems weird to hear them talking about the need to evolve and embrace -- that's well and good for Broken Age, but less so (I think) for RMI. It seems like a better goal would be (as with Thimbleweed Park) to figure out how to capture the delight of the old game for the core audience while recognizing that the core audience itself has evolved; they don't want a game from 1991 so much as a game that feels to them like what they remember it was like to play a game in 1991 (if that makes any sense).

Semi-relatedly, I'm also a little disappointed by Dave's line "pixel art just didn’t stack up for us, and we’ve got to do what’s best for the game." The screenshots look fine, but certainly worse than any Lucas Arts MI game other than EMI. Ron's explanation (that pixel art would get the game labeled as a throwback and hurt it commercially) is more convincing.

It's also a little surreal reading them talk about what is "canon" in the series in terms of the post-MI2 games. The idea that the series has sacrosanct lore and setting seems antithetical to the games themselves, which were goofy, contradictory, and all over the place.

Anyway, I'll probably play it, although I never bothered with EMI or TOMI.
 

Rincewind

Magister
Patron
Joined
Feb 8, 2020
Messages
2,572
Location
down under
Codex+ Now Streaming!
Anyway, given the Return to Monkey Island's raison d'être, it seems weird to hear them talking about the need to evolve and embrace -- that's well and good for Broken Age, but less so (I think) for RMI. It seems like a better goal would be (as with Thimbleweed Park) to figure out how to capture the delight of the old game for the core audience while recognizing that the core audience itself has evolved; they don't want a game from 1991 so much as a game that feels to them like what they remember it was like to play a game in 1991 (if that makes any sense).

Yeah, their approach strikes me a tad schizophrenic too. The vast majority of people who are going to play this are/were fans of the originals.

Semi-relatedly, I'm also a little disappointed by Dave's line "pixel art just didn’t stack up for us, and we’ve got to do what’s best for the game." The screenshots look fine, but certainly worse than any Lucas Arts MI game other than EMI. Ron's explanation (that pixel art would get the game labeled as a throwback and hurt it commercially) is more convincing.

I get all the reasons why they don't want to do "pixel art" (and I liked the looks of TP a lot). Back in the day, they did "just art" with whatever technological limitations they had to work with, so I think it makes sense they don't want to emulate the past anymore.

But this looks like cubist garbage to me. I would be perfectly happy with Broken Age style graphics (never played it but the screenshots look quite nice), or something hand-draw like Machinarium would be even better. I get the feeling that they're putting way more emphasis on trying to be unique rather than simply producing something that's pleasant to look at. I strongly dislike it when an artist does that, style over substance, shock value and all.

By the way, I think console people playing games on TVs from a distance and mobile users are their target audience; if I view the posted art at 50-60% fullscreen, suddenly they look a *lot* better. At fullscreen I need to lean back in my chair because everything is just too big from a normal viewing distance.
 
Last edited:

MRY

Wormwood Studios
Developer
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
5,718
Location
California
I get the feeling that they're putting way more emphasis on trying to be unique rather than simply producing something that's pleasant to look at. I strongly dislike it when an artists does that, style over substance, shock value and all.
It's funny, to me the art doesn't look particularly unique; it feels like pretty standard fare for contemporary animation styles, maybe with a flavor of declined DOTT to boot.
 

Rincewind

Magister
Patron
Joined
Feb 8, 2020
Messages
2,572
Location
down under
Codex+ Now Streaming!
I get the feeling that they're putting way more emphasis on trying to be unique rather than simply producing something that's pleasant to look at. I strongly dislike it when an artists does that, style over substance, shock value and all.
It's funny, to me the art doesn't look particularly unique; it feels like pretty standard fare for contemporary animation styles, maybe with a flavor of declined DOTT to boot.

I don't watch contemporary animation, so I wouldn't know :) But yeah, it's a more cubist DOTT, basically. Of the cartoony style adventures, I really liked the first Discworld -- something like that in high-res would be much better.
 

MRY

Wormwood Studios
Developer
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
5,718
Location
California
Neither do I, but looking at this, my brain doesn't say "this is something new and different" so much as "this is more of the same I've been seeing in many media for the past decade."
 

Morpheus Kitami

Liturgist
Joined
May 14, 2020
Messages
2,592
Yeah, their approach strikes me a tad schizophrenic too. The vast majority of people who are going to play this are/were fans of the originals.
I feel like more old-school developers need to figure out that what people want from projects like these is the idealization they have in their head of the original game. A good chunk of people who will play this new game probably haven't played a Monkey Island game in years, some possibly even 30 years. To a certain extent, that is something the developer would do without the limitations of the past, but it still requires keeping close to some of the original conventions, and requires keeping very close to the original ideas. I feel like of the three developers who have recently gotten into capitalizing on the nostalgia surrounding them, this is the game that understands that the least.
 

Rincewind

Magister
Patron
Joined
Feb 8, 2020
Messages
2,572
Location
down under
Codex+ Now Streaming!
Yeah, I think what they're doing is the worst of both worlds: antagonising their old fan base on one hand, and on the other hand people unfamiliar with the series wouldn't give much fucks about it.

I feel like of the three developers who have recently gotten into capitalizing on the nostalgia surrounding them

Who's the other two you were thinking of?
 

MRY

Wormwood Studios
Developer
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
5,718
Location
California
How it started said:
If I made another Monkey Island...

It would be a retro game that harkened back to Monkey Island 1 and 2. I'd do it as "enhanced low-res". Nice crisp retro art, but augmented by the hardware we have today: parallaxing, depth of field, warm glows, etc. All the stuff we wanted to do back in 1990 but couldn't. Monkey Island deserves that. It's authentic. It doesn't need 3D. Yes, I've seen the video, it's very cool, but Monkey Island wants to be what it is. I would want the game to be how we all remember Monkey Island.

It would be a hardcore adventure game driven by what made that era so great. No tutorials or hint systems or pansy-assed puzzles or catering to the mass-market or modernizing. It would be an adventure game for the hardcore. You're going to get stuck. You're going to be frustrated. Some puzzles will be hard, but all the puzzles will be fair. It's one aspect of Monkey Island I am very proud of.

Full-on inventory. Nice big juicy icons full of pixels. The first version of Monkey Island 1 had text for inventory, a later release and Monkey Island 2 had huge inventory icons and it was nirvana. They will be so nice you'll want to lick them. That's a bullet-point for the box.

There would be dialog puzzles. They weren't really puzzles, but that's what we called them. Being able to tell four jokes at once and meander and getting lost in the humor of a conversation is the staple of Monkey Island. No one has done it better since. Just my opinion.

The game would be the game I wanted to make.
https://grumpygamer.com/if_i_made_another_monkeyisland

How it's going said:
You really look at these [Monkey Island] games, and there have been more non-pixel games than there have been pixel games, at this point in time. And I wanted to embrace something new, and to try something new for the art style, and kind of continue that tradition, almost, of reexamining what the art was for [Monkey Island]. ... For a lot of people, pixel art does feel like a dated thing. ... Pixel art just didn’t stack up for us, and we’ve got to do what’s best for the game.

"What do we need to do? What is the right thing we need to do for this?" Evolving things, evolving the franchise, embracing new audiences—all these things, those are the big questions that we needed to ask ourselves.

We're having fun and advancing things. It’s obviously not the seven- or nine-verb interface from Thimbleweed or back in the day. With interface and stuff, we just kept looking and evolving. An important part of this, in some ways, is keeping and evolving the genre. Not letting it get static, saying, “Well, that’s what we did thirty years ago, so that’s exactly how we’re going to do it these days.” We really have looked at things we can do that are going to be different and better and more streamlined.

Dave and I really tried to have the situations either be explained to people while they’re playing it, so they understood the context to what they were jumping into, but not in a way that talked down to them. Just very naturally explain the context of what’s going on. Or if there was stuff that was going to go over their head, just because it’s kind of an inside joke or inside information, just to make sure that they didn’t feel like they were losing out on something. So that was what we were really trying to do, serve those two audiences well.

A lot of that for us was taking a step back and really looking at what’s going on. How much of it is just cruft? How much of it is just nostalgia? And being able to look at everything from how puzzles are constructed, how dialogues happen, and how the user interface works or how movement works. All of these things. And really, being able to re-examine all that stuff.

If you look at people who play games today, a lot of games are played on consoles. There’s a lot of excellent players — PlayStation players and Switch players and all this stuff. One of the things we really wanted to do is understand how these people would play a point-and-click adventure ... Because it’s different. There’s a different mindset to it. There’s just a different way about how it engages your gameplay brain.
https://adventuregamers.com/articles/view/ron-gilbert-dave-grossman-return-to-monkey-island
https://www.theverge.com/2022/4/14/...n-gilbert-dave-grossman-interview-screenshots

To me, the lesson here is really that people change -- when you talk abstractly about what kind of game you want to make vs. when you can feel the big money from a major license in your grasp. Thankfully, I'm tied to the mast of low-selling original IP, or I'm sure I'd been preaching the gospel of generously making the game 2021 players expect, rather than selfishly pursuing your own vision of truth and beauty.
 

Rincewind

Magister
Patron
Joined
Feb 8, 2020
Messages
2,572
Location
down under
Codex+ Now Streaming!
We're having fun and advancing things. It’s obviously not the seven- or nine-verb interface from Thimbleweed or back in the day. With interface and stuff, we just kept looking and evolving. An important part of this, in some ways, is keeping and evolving the genre.

:despair:

Why aren't people just tired of making money already? What the fuck are they going to do with all that money anyway? I personally see zero reason to "rise above" my nice average suburban existence, I just prefer to just keep doing what I like doing and that's the end of it. I doubt Ron is starving either.

What can it be? Heroin addiction?
 

MRY

Wormwood Studios
Developer
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
5,718
Location
California
We're having fun and advancing things. It’s obviously not the seven- or nine-verb interface from Thimbleweed or back in the day. With interface and stuff, we just kept looking and evolving. An important part of this, in some ways, is keeping and evolving the genre.

:despair:

Why aren't people just tired of making money already? What the fuck are they going to do with all that money anyway? I personally see zero reason to "rise above" my nice average suburban existence, I just prefer to just keep doing what I like doing and that's the end of it. I doubt Ron is starving either.
According to the internet, he lives in a modest home in a Seattle. He doesn't seem particularly rich as game developers go. Compare his degree of glamorous living to Fargo, Avellone, Schafer, etc., let alone the folks at the very top. He was just a salaried employee at Lucas Arts. Hard to begrudge him wanting to keep up with inflation.
 

Rincewind

Magister
Patron
Joined
Feb 8, 2020
Messages
2,572
Location
down under
Codex+ Now Streaming!
We're having fun and advancing things. It’s obviously not the seven- or nine-verb interface from Thimbleweed or back in the day. With interface and stuff, we just kept looking and evolving. An important part of this, in some ways, is keeping and evolving the genre.

:despair:

Why aren't people just tired of making money already? What the fuck are they going to do with all that money anyway? I personally see zero reason to "rise above" my nice average suburban existence, I just prefer to just keep doing what I like doing and that's the end of it. I doubt Ron is starving either.
According to the internet, he lives in a modest home in a Seattle. He doesn't seem particularly rich as game developers go. Compare his degree of glamorous living to Fargo, Avellone, Schafer, etc., let alone the folks at the very top. He was just a salaried employee at Lucas Arts. Hard to begrudge him wanting to keep up with inflation.

Yeah okay, I was under the impression he was quite well-off and doesn't really need the money. I guess that explains it then. Maybe I'm confusing him with Schafer.
 

Darkozric

Arbiter
Edgy
Joined
Jun 3, 2018
Messages
1,729
What the fuck are they going to do with all that money anyway

It's simple. He will pay the woke idiots that he hired. After reading his bad interview, now I have doubts about the gameplay too.

And if the game tanks guess whose fault it will be? The patriarchy or the bad Boomers!!! (No wait, he is the boomer)

Fuck it, I don't expect anything from it.
 

negator2vc

Scholar
Joined
May 1, 2017
Messages
332
Location
Greece
Yeah, I think what they're doing is the worst of both worlds: antagonising their old fan base on one hand, and on the other hand people unfamiliar with the series wouldn't give much fucks about it.
It's not the first time they did this. Remember the Dolores system requirements.
For some reason a pixelart game needed suddenly DirectX 12 so at the time could only be run in Windows 10 and of course no linux version in site.
And all the gave were lame excuses!
 

negator2vc

Scholar
Joined
May 1, 2017
Messages
332
Location
Greece
I am starting to believe that antagonizing old fans of old IP is done on purpose for some reason (whole media landscape not just this game or games in general).
After all it's Disney IP and despite what Gilbert say we all know who have final say about all creative choices.
 

Darkozric

Arbiter
Edgy
Joined
Jun 3, 2018
Messages
1,729
That is it. I hope you guys enjoy this game, but it's clearly not for me.

This "art" looks like a placeholder art or if it was made by an 8 year old child. Unacceptable for the budget they have.
But fuck the art, the interview has many red flags about the gameplay too. He was working with the Dolores engine to dumb down the interface and gameplay for the modern switch retardos.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom