Blame Anne Rice for that. Those New Moon is just Anne Rice mark 2.
Anyway, IF EVER I choose to do a Nosferatu run, I would change a few lines of command so that the game use the body model of something nice, not Nos models. We would spend too much time running through the sewer alone with that butt on the screen, no reason for it to be an ugly one.
Even that is sort of 'later Anne Rice'. Actually, come to think of it, it's not any one individual piece of Anne Rice, but her effect on the mythos as a whole.
Louis is "woe is me for being a vampire", but that's also because in "Interview with a vampire", vampires
are evil predators who eat mortals like cattle. She doesn't give him the 'easy out' of being able to drink blood without killing people, and consequently his immortality is pretty shit - it's always a matter of time before he's going to be fleeing an angry torch-bearing mob, his only choices are to kill innocents or die himself, and he can't commit to either of them so he's in a sort of half-existence. But it's presented as being entirely a matter of Louis' own weakness (he starts the book wanting to kill himself but lacking the resolve with which to do so, and arguably he ends the book the same way).
Interview isn't exactly great fiction, but it's more nuanced than her later work - there's a recurring reminder that, unlike LeStat, Louis
did have a choice about whether to become a vampire in the first place, and he made the choice
knowing what it entailed. He's a mopey over-privileged dickhead because that's what he was all along.
That, in itself, is pretty far from New Moon - the reader is supposed to
like Edward, whilst Louis is sympathetic but
always weak and the author of his own misery because he can neither 'do the right thing' and kill himself, nor accept being a predator...not terribly far from how he's first introduced, moping to all who must hear (because he's a wealthy aristocrat with everything laid out for him) about how much he wants to kill himself because his wife died in childbirth, while deliberately slumming it in dens of poverty/disease, completely oblivious to how self-centred and obnoxious he's being by going all "woe is me" when half the people around him are probably going to die of cholera. That's what prompts Lestat to turn him in the first place - 'oh, you want to die you poor poor thing. Ok, I'm happy to oblige, I can drain you and throw your body into the ocean...still want to die? Oh, faced with the reality of dying you suddenly aren't so sure. Well how about I give you
lots of life...but I'll be straight with you, no sunlight, you're going to be a predator etc etc....but that's fine, I mean, you don't want to live anyway, right? I'm only going to go through with this if you want it, otherwise I'll leave you half-turned and you'll be dead in a few minutes, won't even hurt...wait what's that? You want me to go through with it? You
don't want to die? Well how about you act on that insight, you ungrateful prick'.
It's not the best written of books, but at least the character perspective is right - it's ultimately pretty damning of Louis; he isn't supposed to be wholly unsympathetic, but that side of him, the whole "woe is me" schtick
is presented as entirely Louis' own fault. It's mirrored in how Louis in the 20th century is still trying to talk and act like a European aristocrat, whereas Lestat wakes up, takes a look around, and throws himself into 20th century living.
Once Lestat takes over main character duties in the series, the whole 'woe is me for being a vampire' thing goes out the window. He
loves being a vampire, he's got mind-reading powers that Louis lacks, so he can choose to kill only murderers and people who piss him off and
thoroughly enjoys it.
The problem with Rice is that (a) in later books she doesn't commit to the dichotomy, and her characters begin to take on the worst aspects of both, and (not unrelated) (b) the overall effect upon vampire mythos was to combine Louis' "woe is me" with Lestat's "vampire as superhero rockstar".
I'm not defending Rice's writing, there's plenty of cringe material in there. In particular, she made the very common mistake of taking a popular character who should only ever be used in small doses and then making him the lead. Lestat works well in
Interview because he reflects what's wrong with Louis' perspective - it takes the typical 'villain' role and has him win the moral argument. It's not a character that you should give a fully fleshed out story and psychology, as that just dilutes his effectiveness.
But it's a bit much to blame Edward on her, as opposed to her readership. You can't get much further from Edward/New Moon then by having a first book with the central theme of "no, fuck YOU Mr Woe-is-Me, not
my fault that you're too weak to either appreciate the life you've got, or act on your convictions and change it", and then a follow up book where the main character is "hell yeah, being a vampire is
awesome! I'm going start a glam-metal band and go on tour!"