Hits. The Internet loves lists and any list is something that people just have to read, because they have a desire to endlessly debate which game is better and which one most deserves to be at what position.What is the point of such lists?
Does our userbase reflect our high standards, however?![]()
Hits.What is the point of such lists?
People voted for these games because they liked them over older games
No, it was because they didn't play the older games. Whether or not that makes them "uneducated" is a matter for debate.
So how do guys like me, who played the older games, yet still voted for the games in this Top 10, fit in with your argument? Are we just exceptions to prove the rule? What's your basis for claiming that people who voted for Baldur's Gate haven't played the older games?
As far as I see it, I can point to actual posters who played older games yet voted for the newer ones. I'm not sure you can point to the people you're talking about; people who just played these games and never bothered with the older ones.
I guess neither one of us have any sort of basis for our claims, really, which is too bad.
Nail on the head there Grunker, the methodology doesn't support an outcome (either way) that says that X game is better than Y game because it doesn't contain the data that would tell us whether the voter has experience of titles to make a subjective judgement that one is 'better'.
Aha!
Well, then I'm right, and you're wrong
You guys made the claim that people here hadn't played the old games and were just voting for Baldur's Gate because that's what they'd played. I just said the possibility of them having played both and liking the latter more was just as possible.
However I think we can assume safely that the top three is something of a holy trinity of rpg gaming here. Wonder if we'll ever see any movement in that part of the list
The following pages of butthurt.What is the point of such lists?
Something about helping newfags or causing butthurt at BSN as well, but no one really believes that...
sighI'm off to do something more fruitful like bashing my head against a brick wall.
However I think we can assume safely that the top three is something of a holy trinity of rpg gaming here. Wonder if we'll ever see any movement in that part of the list
We have. BG2 defeated Arcanum.
The following pages of butthurt.What is the point of such lists?
Something about helping newfags or causing butthurt at BSN as well, but no one really believes that...
Grunker: I suppose there's no conclusive proof, but I suspect the popularity aspect is important. I mean, we talk about the top 10, but don't forget that we were given up to 25 choices. So it's not really a case where we choose 90s games over older ones. Trash is right and there's probably 4 or so which will always be at the top (F1/F2/Arc/PS:T) but from that point onward, I do believe that the higher profile of some games (i.e Icewind Dale) gives it an advantage over other, older games, which don't have it.
Grunker said:The same logic you could use - more people have played Baldur's Gate and thus more people voted for it - I could use: "People who played the classics are more dedicated to the forums and thus more likely to vote, apparantly they agree with me that the current Top 10 list holds better games."
The truth is, we don't know, and any claim we make is purely based on our subjective notion of what the Codex is. I disagree that it's just a place for the Mainstream -10 years, and I think the standards we set for our content proves that.
I will point out that the list was, is, and always will be subjectives based on the users surveyed at that particular period. You want a definitive list that is truly objective? Find a common and definitive definition of qualities for a RPG in the first place. AND THAT is an ongoing debate around here, but people get tired of it. So if you complain about the userbase, feel free. But remember that "youth these day~!" is a complaint of an old man every age. if you are not, oh well.And there we went from having a nice conversation about games into sperger territory. Disagreeing with me all you want but if you're going to nitpick every sentence, misrepresent my words, cherry pick and try to use every logical fallacy you can find then we won't have much of a discussion here, Grunker. Everything I can say I already said in my first post here but I'll summarise my point as best as I can for you; the list is more indicative of the userbase of this site than as a defenitive guide on the best rpg's.
Grunker said:The same logic you could use - more people have played Baldur's Gate and thus more people voted for it - I could use: "People who played the classics are more dedicated to the forums and thus more likely to vote, apparantly they agree with me that the current Top 10 list holds better games."
I wanted to bitch that QfG has no right to be in any RPG top ten, but then I remembered there is already Deus Ex in this one, so sure, why not.The list is, as one might expect, a travesty. Quest for Glory 1 and 4 should be in the top 10. New Vegas is not a PC game, and is also shit. Top 50 console RPGs, maybe. Icewind Dale? Get outta here.
New Vegas better ranked than JA2...
![]()
Top XYZ lists never fail to deliver comedy.
Because lately the requirement of a RPG lax enough that JA2 qualify as a RPGlite. What do you want? Character building? Team building? Quest? character interaction? JA2 got it all.JA2 is an RPG?
there's no way that a Top Ten List that includes Icewind Dale and excludes something like Betrayal at Krondor or Darklands is a good result.
Too difficult.I'm somewhat surprised that none of the Etrtian Odyssey games even made it into the top50 despite good word-of-mouth around here. Too niche?
Because lately the requirement of a RPG lax enough that JA2 qualify as a RPGlite. What do you want? Character building? Team building? Quest? character interaction? JA2 got it all.JA2 is an RPG?
Just look at the console voting for a more clear view; there are so many JRPGs that people like that after #6 the votes split completly... we had votes for 255 different games... 119 of them with only vote. It's as if each voter liked 2 games that no one else voted for! That doesn't mean there aren't good JRPGs besides the top 10, but that each of them pleases a different kind of player, and each person has his favorite.