Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.
"This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
Fuck you, the combat in DCotE was really enjoyable for me.
Let me remind you that you're not some sort of supersoldier from Call of Duty in this game, you're a fucking morphine addict with questionable sanity who somehow got the job of the detective.
I got that you are not supposed to be a fighter in Dark Corners. The developers apparently forgot that though, since the game pushes you in one action sequence after another in the second half. They even have a sequence where you sit in a driving vehicle and have to shoot enemies who came after you. Quite similar to some sequences in Call of Duty actually...
Aye! Crystal Dynamics TRs were okay, with Underworld being their best (and Anniversary of course but that's just because it's a remake of the excellent first game), and original series was great. Especially Last Revelation, fucking masterpiece.
The newshit reboot NuRaider is to Tomb Raider what Thi4f is to Thief, though. Fuck that shit.
What a coincidence, I just completed BG1 myself. (Not the enhanced edition though.)
It was a really great game, much better than I remembered it to be. Surprisingly enough, I enjoyed everything -- not just the combat, but also the quests and exploration. Pathfinding sucked hard, though, and made me rage a lot.
BG2 + ToB, here I come! Let's see how the second game compares.
What a coincidence, I just completed BG1 myself. (Not the enhanced edition though.)
It was a really great game, much better than I remembered it to be. Surprisingly enough, I enjoyed everything -- not just the combat, but also the quests and exploration. Pathfinding sucked hard, though, and made me rage a lot.
BG2 + ToB, here I come! Let's see how the second game compares.
Been trying to get my party completed asap, getting Edwin is quite the trouble, can't kill the two Stone Golems that are in that mage dude's house, so I lured em outside and stealthed, killed the mage dude fine and all, but now the two golems are somewhere in the docks, waiting to ruin my day.
What a coincidence, I just completed BG1 myself. (Not the enhanced edition though.)
It was a really great game, much better than I remembered it to be. Surprisingly enough, I enjoyed everything -- not just the combat, but also the quests and exploration. Pathfinding sucked hard, though, and made me rage a lot.
BG2 + ToB, here I come! Let's see how the second game compares.
Last boss on his knees. It almost looks like I'm holding his heart.
BONUS:
Nice foreshadowing (if you can call it that), by mentioning Jon Irenicus. I thought it was cool when I noticed that the first time.
I can't remember the names of the difficulty mods I installed, but sometimes things got way too ridiculous. The only way I won that fight was by some serious cheesing (running away, sending only one person in with magic immunity scroll and waiting till their buffs ran out etc.)
Triple fireball to the face!
You can't see it from this screenshot, but one of them actually survived.
Nope, BGT + widescreen mod. Vanilla, basically. It's just been so long since I played BG that I wanted to experience it as a first-time player would. Which I actually did and am happy about - it's not often that you can forget the game to an extent that you can play it like it was the first time. I did remember IWD well enough, but not BG1/2.
I'll bother with mods and additional challenge and powergaming and stuff for my next playthrough.
What a coincidence, I just completed BG1 myself. (Not the enhanced edition though.)
It was a really great game, much better than I remembered it to be. Surprisingly enough, I enjoyed everything -- not just the combat, but also the quests and exploration. Pathfinding sucked hard, though, and made me rage a lot.
BG2 + ToB, here I come! Let's see how the second game compares.
Cavalier. I think it's the first time I've played a Paladin in any (?) game actually - I usually like playing mages, clerics, or something exotic like bards/monks. I enjoyed it for BG1, but I'm not yet sure if I want to keep this class for BG2... I want to play a good aligned party though so maybe. Inquisitor also looks alright. Alternatively, the powergamer in me wants to play a Kensai dual-classed to Mage or Thief. I haven't decided yet.
(I do kinda want to play a Paladin for reasons of LARPing though. Call it the Christmas mood.)
I'd also love to play a Monk or a Bard someday, but definitely not this time.
Again, it's been so long since I played these games that I'm not powergaming but just going with the flow. I literally don't remember anything about the quests or NPCs except some major plot points that are just hard to forget. I don't even remember what NPCs there are in BG2 overall. So in BG1 I ended up with the most standard party possible: PC, Imoen, Khalid, Jaheira, Minsc, Dynaheir. I also had other NPCs join temporarily at some point. It was serviceable enough.
For BG2 I know I want a good/neutral party, a couple of mages/sorcerers (because the more mages the merrier), and a cleric. The rest is still up in the air, but since I have zero metagaming knowledge I'll just pick 'em up as they come and will of course end up with the most boring party imaginable again. I'm okay with that though. At the moment Age of Decadence is enough for my obsessive character building needs (and I'm enjoying it a whole lot, too).
Nope, BGT + widescreen mod. Vanilla, basically. It's just been so long since I played BG that I wanted to experience it as a first-time player would. Which I actually did and am happy about - it's not often that you can forget the game to an extent that you can play it like it was the first time. I did remember IWD well enough, but not BG1/2.
I'll bother with mods and additional challenge and powergaming and stuff for my next playthrough.
[
Cavalier. I think it's the first time I've played a Paladin in any (?) game actually - I usually like playing mages, clerics, or something exotic like bards/monks. I enjoyed it for BG1, but I'm not yet sure if I want to keep this class for BG2... I want to play a good aligned party though so maybe. Inquisitor also looks alright. Alternatively, the powergamer in me wants to play a Kensai dual-classed to Mage or Thief. I haven't decided yet.
Inquisitor is horribly op for BG2, makes some of the more difficult encounters a cakewalk. Paladins were pointless in BG and IWD so they buffed them for BG2 by making all their kits really good, though cavalier and undead hunter aren't imbalanced.
Most boring character BG I ever played was a Kensai/Mage. Most of the game he's too weak, and then suddenly he becomes über powerful. Not my idea of fun, at least.
Wait, the number who like both are actually quite few? I like both of them. I recognize that the Gold Box games are horribly outdated from a UI and interface perspective, but they're still loads of fun to play.
Wait, the number who like both are actually quite few? I like both of them. I recognize that the Gold Box games are horribly outdated from a UI and interface perspective, but they're still loads of fun to play.
Seems like all the Best RPG-threads always evolve to are Gold Box crowd versus IE crowd and then the Fallout crowd who hates most games that aren't, well... Fallout.