Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Sid Meier's Civilization: Beyond Earth

Roderick

Savant
Joined
Apr 27, 2011
Messages
415
this kind of games should probably be made in nice looking 2d
 

Spectacle

Arcane
Patron
Joined
May 25, 2006
Messages
8,363
this kind of games should probably be made in nice looking 2d

No point in doing this since 3D art has already reached, even exceeded, fidelity of 2D art.
2D art seems to have a lot more room for artistic expression though, unlike 3D art that either looks more or less the same, or relies on gimmicky filters to look different.
 

Morgoth

Ph.D. in World Saving
Patron
Joined
Nov 30, 2003
Messages
36,141
Location
Clogging the Multiverse with a Crowbar
3D art provides gameplay functionality that 2D art does not. Besides, most artists in these days are being trained and paid to create 3D art. 2D art pipelines are time (money) costly and a pain in the ass, at least with current middleware engines.
 

DeepOcean

Arcane
Joined
Nov 8, 2012
Messages
7,405
Screenshots from PC gamer review
attachment.php

attachment.php

attachment.php

attachment.php
They hired a civ 5 modder to make this game?
 

oscar

Arcane
Joined
Aug 30, 2008
Messages
8,064
Location
NZ
I'd shrink the unit sizes down and add more per hex. They disrupt and dominate the terrain too much. As it stands the Pandora units look better.
 

Tytus

Arcane
Joined
Jul 9, 2011
Messages
3,653
Location
Mazovia
I did a review of it.

Aaah, shameless self-promotion so tasty. But I did read the review it's quite informative, thanks. Though I would disagree with one point that CK2 discourages you from being a warmonger. With the most recent expansions where you can create a standing army, borrow a lot of money from the jews and then expell them. You can basically have a large independent army from your vassals. That prevents them from forming factions (or rather pushing faction claims) and also keeps them happy because you aren't using that much of their levies. On top of that if you have a neighbour with different religion they your own and a standing army it's basically a field day. War after war, after war, after war.
 

Spectacle

Arcane
Patron
Joined
May 25, 2006
Messages
8,363
Floatstone - natural resource that is linked(???) to Purity Affinity.
BnirBvFCQAAczye.jpg
What the hell? What we've seen until now has been relatively serious if not exactly hard SF, but then they go and add magical floating rocks? I can accept sci-fantasy if it's well done, but the magic bits better be central to the plot/setting and not just random bullshit thrown in for the hell of it!
:mob:
My interest in this game has dropped by 68%.
 

tuluse

Arcane
Joined
Jul 20, 2008
Messages
11,400
Serpent in the Staglands Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Shadorwun: Hong Kong
It's pretty clear they're inspired by copying James Cameron's Avatar.

Two billion dollars don't lie.
 

Zeriel

Arcane
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
14,029
"Floatstone" is pretty bad. It's not the idea that's unbelievable, but the utterly sophmorific take on it. It floats, it's a stone, floatstone!

Unobtainium indeed.
 

Shadenuat

Arcane
Joined
Dec 9, 2011
Messages
11,977
Location
Russia
More reason to go Purity and arm your troops with big robots with chainsaws on their arms.

I'm waiting for this game, I wanted at least something resembling SMAC forever. Even if I know that C:BY will probably be full of friendly looking shiny buttons that do nothing or do the same thing.

Upgrades and quests sound interesting as RPG element and so, maybe armies will be smaller and bloated hexes would not matter as in CIV5...
 
Last edited:

Johannes

Arcane
Joined
Nov 20, 2010
Messages
10,669
Location
casting coach
I'm waiting for this game, I wanted at least something resembling SMAC forever. Even if I know that C:BY will probably be full of friendly looking shiny buttons that do nothing or do the same thing.
That Pandora game covers that already, no? It might not be very good (going by hearsay) but then this will probably be worse.
 

KoolNoodles

Arcane
Joined
Apr 28, 2012
Messages
3,545
Floatstone is kind of a dumbass name, sure, but there are plenty of dumb naming conventions in science, especially when every other name has been used up. I mean, there's a fish called a "Flabby whalefish", because...uhhh, who the fuck knows? There's a subspecies called "Hairyfish", because it looks like it has hairs. We have names like Anteater, Sloth, Soapstone/Limestone/Mudstone, etc. So humans land on this planet and see a rock that floats, they call it "Floatstone", and we should be surprised because....?

And as something weirdly sci-fi on an alien world, I would think a naturally floating rock of some kind fits the bill.

Really, there are better things to whine about.
 

oscar

Arcane
Joined
Aug 30, 2008
Messages
8,064
Location
NZ
I'm more confused as thematically it seems to have nothing to do with the in-game concept of the Purity doctrine.
 

Space Satan

Arcane
Vatnik
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
6,436
Location
Space Hell
I'm more confused as thematically it seems to have nothing to do with the in-game concept of the Purity doctrine.
They said Purity favors huge and massive units with lots of firepower and their most favorite weapon is giant floating platforms with giant guns.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom