Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Starfield Pre-Release Thread [GAME RELEASED, GO TO NEW THREAD]

Stavrophore

Most trustworthy slavic man
Patron
Vatnik
Joined
Aug 17, 2016
Messages
14,415
Location
don't identify with EU-NPC land
Strap Yourselves In
Should every AAA RPG that have the budget for it, be made in first or third person? Technicalities and finances aside, what are the advantages of isometric/top down view vs first/third person? I really can't find any good arguments vs the immersion that first person brings, especially when you can see your body[skyrim can do that with a mod].
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
50,754
Codex Year of the Donut
Should every AAA RPG that have the budget for it, be made in first or third person? Technicalities and finances aside, what are the advantages of isometric/top down view vs first/third person? I really can't find any good arguments vs the immersion that first person brings, especially when you can see your body[skyrim can do that with a mod].
I hate first person perspective in games because it does a horrible job at representing human vision. Close up third person, as strange as it sounds, does a significantly better job of representing our vision.

First person is decent for horror games I suppose.
 

thesecret1

Arcane
Joined
Jun 30, 2019
Messages
6,632
Should every AAA RPG that have the budget for it, be made in first or third person? Technicalities and finances aside, what are the advantages of isometric/top down view vs first/third person? I really can't find any good arguments vs the immersion that first person brings, especially when you can see your body[skyrim can do that with a mod].
Depends on how you want your combat to work. Third person can beat first person when you want the player to have higher combat awareness, ie. in group fights, third person provides a lot more information than first person – countering a person attacking you from the back is practically impossible in first person, for example, while being bread and butter of third person. Isometric is great at managing multiple characters (something that's borderline impossible in first person), while first person excels in 1v1 duels (ie. taking into account attack directions and so on).

Basically: Do you have more than one character you should order around? Isometric/top down. Is the game geared towards having you fight large enemy groups where you're expected to riposte and shit like that? Third person. Is the game geared towards more complicated combat, where attack directions, timing, and various combos matter, and where you will usually be against a single opponent, or a small group at most? First person.

In a game like Skyrim, it doesn't really matter whether you go for first or third person, as it's not playing to strengths of either (combat is always just retarded button mashing, who cares what perpective you do it in?) but games like, for example, KC:D make full use of the perspective given to them.
 

perfectslumbers

Arbiter
Joined
Oct 24, 2021
Messages
1,202
Should every AAA RPG that have the budget for it, be made in first or third person? Technicalities and finances aside, what are the advantages of isometric/top down view vs first/third person? I really can't find any good arguments vs the immersion that first person brings, especially when you can see your body[skyrim can do that with a mod].
I find combat generally much more fun in isometric party rpgs than any first or third person rpg, but if it's a single character then third or first person is more enjoyable.
 

Stavrophore

Most trustworthy slavic man
Patron
Vatnik
Joined
Aug 17, 2016
Messages
14,415
Location
don't identify with EU-NPC land
Strap Yourselves In
for example, while being bread and butter of third person. Isometric is great at managing multiple characters (something that's borderline impossible in first person), while first person excels in 1v1 duels (ie. taking into account attack directions and so on).

This is a problem with elaborate magic system i agree. You would need to allow player to set extensive ruleset for magic usage by companion to not pause/move camera and constantly make player feel like OOBE, which is out of scope for mainstream games and would need a rudimentary algorithm/coding skill demand from the user. So devs usually make the ability pool for companions much shallower and automated, which takes agency from player[not good!]. For Starfield this won't be a problem since there's no elaborate magic system, and i guess neither will be for abilities. Something along ME2 will be most likely utilized.
 
Last edited:
Vatnik Wumao
Joined
Oct 2, 2018
Messages
19,206
Location
大同
Should every AAA RPG that have the budget for it, be made in first or third person? Technicalities and finances aside, what are the advantages of isometric/top down view vs first/third person? I really can't find any good arguments vs the immersion that first person brings, especially when you can see your body[skyrim can do that with a mod].
I hate first person perspective in games because it does a horrible job at representing human vision. Close up third person, as strange as it sounds, does a significantly better job of representing our vision.
First person games feel like you're playing a manlet tbh, although I guess that's due to the limitations of the typical PC screen (whether monitor or TV) being too wide to properly account for a normal line of sight.
 

Stavrophore

Most trustworthy slavic man
Patron
Vatnik
Joined
Aug 17, 2016
Messages
14,415
Location
don't identify with EU-NPC land
Strap Yourselves In
Should every AAA RPG that have the budget for it, be made in first or third person? Technicalities and finances aside, what are the advantages of isometric/top down view vs first/third person? I really can't find any good arguments vs the immersion that first person brings, especially when you can see your body[skyrim can do that with a mod].
I hate first person perspective in games because it does a horrible job at representing human vision. Close up third person, as strange as it sounds, does a significantly better job of representing our vision.
First person games feel like you're playing a manlet tbh, although I guess that's due to the limitations of the typical PC screen (whether monitor or TV) being too wide to properly account for a normal line of sight.

I don't have such display, but i wonder how 32:9 curved monitor feel, i think that kind of displays can fix the problem of fov with right curvature, display size and distance from monitor.
 

Vic

Savant
Undisputed Queen of Faggotry Bethestard
Joined
Oct 24, 2018
Messages
5,704
Location
[REDACTED]
6loodd.jpg
 

ropetight

Savant
Joined
Dec 9, 2018
Messages
1,678
Location
Lower Wolffuckery
Should every AAA RPG that have the budget for it, be made in first or third person? Technicalities and finances aside, what are the advantages of isometric/top down view vs first/third person? I really can't find any good arguments vs the immersion that first person brings, especially when you can see your body[skyrim can do that with a mod].
I hate first person perspective in games because it does a horrible job at representing human vision. Close up third person, as strange as it sounds, does a significantly better job of representing our vision.

First person is decent for horror games I suppose.
Because looking over our own ass is the way we see the world.
 

Zed Duke of Banville

Dungeon Master
Patron
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Messages
13,036
Should every AAA RPG that have the budget for it, be made in first or third person? Technicalities and finances aside, what are the advantages of isometric/top down view vs first/third person? I really can't find any good arguments vs the immersion that first person brings, especially when you can see your body[skyrim can do that with a mod].
The issue of perspective cannot be disconnected from other game mechanics; generally, the subgenre in which an RPG falls will determine its proper perspective. Action RPGs such as Demon's/Dark Souls or Dragon's Dogma, for example, require a second-person-from-behind perspective, for the player to be fully aware of the spatial location of the character versus enemies, since proprioception is lacking. Party-based dungeon-crawlers, whether in real-time (Dungeon Master-likes) or turn-based (Wizardry-likes), need a first-person perspective for immersive dungeon exploration, though single-character 3D dungeon crawlers (Underworld-likes) or Open World games (Morrowind-likes) can use either first-person or second-person-from-behind perspectives (the latter was not technologically possible for Underworld-likes still relying heavily on sprites). Tactical RPGs, which are focused on turn-based combat, require a third-person bird's-eye or isometric perspective, so that the player can understand the relative location of both PCs and enemies and plan accordingly.
 

soulburner

Cipher
Joined
Sep 21, 2013
Messages
837
I agree about the perspective being integral to the gameplay. I'm generally a fan of first person perspective and I like Bethesda games for giving a choice. There are many third person games I cannot play because I feel disconnected from the player character. I couldn't feel the horror of Dead Space, for example, because a dude covered half my screen and I didn't care if he dies or not. First person gives me this feeling of actually being in the world, looking at items and shit and caring about "my" survival. Interestingly, I do not have this kind of immersion breakage when playing tactical isometric-like games.

Games like The Elden Ring might not work in first person, so I play them as intended by developers, but there are titles which do not have this kind of perspective + gameplay connection and I am having less fun with them. If Cyberpunk 2077 or Dying Light 2 kept their combat models but were third person games, I wouldn't be interested.
 

RobotSquirrel

Arcane
Developer
Joined
Aug 9, 2020
Messages
2,107
Location
Adelaide
That not porting to PS5 point is a load of bullshit. It's not like Bethesda has been incompetent with the PlayStation ports in the past. So how exactly is that going to add "Focus" plus you could've outsourced it and it wouldn't do anything to affect the dev team.
Also confirms that the Xbox is the lead and the PC a port.
Everything this guy says is just a feature list.
 
Last edited:

Zed Duke of Banville

Dungeon Master
Patron
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Messages
13,036
Just as Brian Fargo regained the hearts and minds of the Codex in 2020 with Wasteland 3, so will Todd Howard regain the hearts and minds of the Codex in 2023 with Starfield.

Todd-Howard-Savior.png
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom