Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Stellaris - Paradox new sci-fi grand strategy game

IDtenT

Menace to sobriety!
Patron
Joined
Jan 21, 2012
Messages
14,365
Location
South Africa; My pronouns are: Banal/Shit/Boring
Divinity: Original Sin
Yeah. I read the question incorrectly. Forgot there is a difficulty scaling option.

I prefer playing the game on the default difficulty because cheating is bad. The AI devs have to catch up if it's not good enough.

What makes it worse is that a lot of multiplayer strategies rely on cheesing the cheating AI, which I think creates an unfair challenge to players who don't.
 

Ravielsk

Magister
Joined
Feb 20, 2021
Messages
1,514
So, what you guys think about the new changes, with the new Unity and Sprawl changes and whatnot?

Unity overhaul is mostly meh. Its really just shifting some function to it that were previously exclusive to influence or energy credits. Its not exactly better or worse in most regards. The only problem I have with it is that it seriously cripples your ability to explore because now the individual scientists are more expensive than the ships they drive. Especially early game its crippling but again becomes a complete non-issue in mid-game. I simply reverted the cost of hiring them back to credits because the game already has enough waiting mechanics as is and it does not need another one.

As for sprawl that is the usually PDX shitshow. For one they barely tweaked the sprawl numbers and as s result their 100 empire size is a two planet "empire" with 3-4 jumps between the planets. Go over that and you start accumulating penalties. For the more challenging origins such as doomsday this is utterly insane especially coupled with the cost of claiming new systems because it practically means that you can star reaping penalties of playing wide before you colonize a second planet. Thing is these values were "alright" in the old system where you could mitigate the penalties with bureaucrats. It was still stupid but at least playable. In this new system the cap either should have been 500 or the values of empire spread should have been significantly lower.
 

Space Satan

Arcane
Vatnik
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
6,216
Location
Space Hell

Overlord, the next major expansion to Stellaris, will be arriving alongside the Stellaris 3.4 “Cepheus” Update. Click here to wishlist.

The Brightest Star Must Guide Them
Overlord’s thematic focus is on exerting your will across the galaxy, the projection of power, and the expansion of civilization under your glorious banner. The other galactic powers can choose to submit willingly or by force, but they will submit.

In Federations, we expanded diplomacy between equals with the federations themselves and the politics of the Galactic Community. Nemesis included more hostile forms of diplomacy with espionage operations, and some empires declaring themselves more equal than others with the Custodians and the Galactic Imperium.

In Overlord, we will explore diplomacy between empires that are explicitly not equal.

New Ways to Rule
Vassalization mechanics will undergo significant changes.

A major goal in this revision was to make subjugation a more valuable and viable system with benefits for both sides, rather than being a delayed “Game Over” as you wait for Integration should you be subjugated.

1647017968023.png


We’ll go into detail about the changes in how vassalization contracts will work next week, along with how contract negotiations function between Overlord and Subject.

Later, we’ll describe the three Specialist Vassals and their place in the galaxy, as well as Overlord Holdings.

1647370936416.png


New Beginnings and Friends
Five new Origins will arrive in Overlord (including one for Hive Empires).

1647018289301.png


We’ll also have some new Enclaves for you to encounter.

1647017988918.png



1647017997809.png



1647018007766.png


All Roads Lead to Deneb IIb
Governing a galaxy spanning empire is challenging, and threats can come from any direction. If you cannot take and defend what is rightfully yours, was it ever yours to begin with?

A new megastructure will allow you to counter such threats as well as help you take what you deserve.

1647018016804.png


Other new constructions will allow you to elevate civilization to new heights...

1647018026926.png


...and exert your influence to build a network tying the galaxy together, with your capital as the center, of course.

1647018034191.png


Realize Your Grand Design
Will you be a benevolent Overlord that brings prosperity to the galaxy, or an oppressive tyrant exploiting your vassals? Or will you instead serve and become part of something greater?

The choice is yours.

1647018138430.png

Wishlist Stellaris: Overlord Now!
[/paste:font]
 

Ravielsk

Magister
Joined
Feb 20, 2021
Messages
1,514
Honestly, I can't say much about sprawl because I was too busy getting my shit pushed in to even get close to my sprawl limits.
That is actually the one thing this patch seems to have done right. The AI aggression is no longer that of a wet noodle and it can actually push back against the player... if you let it that is.

Because despite all the kvetching PDX does about how they overhauled diplomacy its still just a game of bribery where occasionally you can send in one your dudes instead of paying. So as long as you are not playing as some genocidal civ and occasionally bribe the AI it will completely ignore you.
 

Norfleet

Moderator
Joined
Jun 3, 2005
Messages
12,250
My game went from Star Trek to The Terminator in less than ten years.
The Federation is gone, Riker's beard is everywhere!

But you know, you're describing exactly what you'd expect of the way Stellaris Galaxygen works. The first thing to understand about it is that pacifism is rare. There's a specific bias against pacifists generating because a galaxy of pacifism is deemed boring. The second is that all of your neighbors will hate you, because the game will attempt to seed the universe by balancing the ethics while working outwards. Which means it will balance the whatever you pick by immediately seeding your neighbors as the opposites. That's why you, as a Fanatic Materialist and Xenophile, find that your neighbors are xenophobic exterminators and spiritualists. And now you see, that evil will always triumph, because good is dumb.
 

Delterius

Arcane
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
15,956
Location
Entre a serra e o mar.
the way Stellaris generates competing empires means if you play as a megacorp then the entire galaxy (not quite but still) is megacorps who hate you

so play merchant guilds instead
 
Joined
Mar 3, 2010
Messages
8,819
Location
Italy
the solution is simple: create your own races and use only those. i made tens and tens of those, trying to make them as peculiar as possible (with the help of as many mods as possible). some were made to be efficient, some to be fun, some to be fodder. stellaris is larper paradise, use it as such, don't succumb to the random demon.
 

Dyspaire

Cipher
Joined
Sep 26, 2008
Messages
280
Location
Relative
Does anyone know if the mod Amazing Space Battles is available anywhere other than Steam? It seems to be the only source, and that's a shame.
 

Dyspaire

Cipher
Joined
Sep 26, 2008
Messages
280
Location
Relative
Not that I'm not familiar with the high seas, but in this case it's just because I'm an oldfag who legitimately has no interest in ever using Steam.

And that mod looks amazing. I had no idea there was such a thing as the workshop downloader. Much obliged.
 
Joined
May 11, 2007
Messages
1,853,653
Location
Belém do Pará, Império do Brasil
Humanocogni managed to defeat the machines because they suicided on the Metalheads who had taken their former territory. It was easy to swoop in for the kill.

Too bad the Metalheads attacked after a few years and conquered the Humanocogni, even when the nearby Spiritualists were helping. Despite all the efforts, the fighting, the plan to salvage superior enemy tech and produce better vessels... it all came for naught.

I would post screens but I have no idea where Stellaris is putting my screenshots lol.

RIP Humanocogni, the Project Xenotype made them quite adorable. Fought like lions.
 
Joined
May 11, 2007
Messages
1,853,653
Location
Belém do Pará, Império do Brasil
Rate my Humanocogni build:

Traits:
- Intelligent
- Talented
- Quick Learners
- Deviants
- Unruly

Ethics: Fanatic Materialist/Xenophile
Government: Oligarchic (for Meritocracy)
Origin: Mechanist
Civics: Technocracy/Meritocracy

It's all about Research and Leader Bonuses, which also feed back into Research.

I wonder would if I should have gone with something else in place of Mechanist like Prosperous Unification. Robots are neat to have but Materialist/Robots synergizes best with Synthetic Ascension and AFAIK Synthetic Ascension is pretty lame. I would rather get psionic because I'm stacking enough growth and leader bonuses to make them the ultimate researchers. Robots can't grow naturally and their traits aren't as cool. Too bad materialists suck at getting psionic ascension. Never did Synthetic Ascension but seems lame, would be a lot more interesting prospect if the end-game was perfect technology/biology symbiosis than "We turned ourselves into robots beep bop".

Fuck that robot shit. Plus my Xenology big-brained gals are cute.

Also Robots seem more of a go-to for xenophobes (who have a harder time getting friendly aliens to colonize planets), and my guys are xenophiles. Maybe I should opt for another origin next time.

Some notes of my new Humanocogni game:

- The new Unity framework definitively slows down exploration, because you no longer can spam Science Ships like there's no tomorrow. I would usually make some depending on my needs, and usually after getting a new tradition point. Early on, I went with 2-4 science ships, going with more later on once my Unity income jumped up.
- Autochnous Monuments matter now, they will give a nice Unity boost to a colony that has a proper capital built.
- I'm even more split on which Tradition is the best starter. It was always a contest between Discovery and Expansion. Now it seems like you want to get started on both, get the best bonuses (+1 pop on colonization and +survey) before committing to finishing one of them. Of course, depends on wherever you use garanteeded planets and how many worthy planets are around.
- I started with two Genocidals (DE and FP) on my borders, fuck my life.
- One thing I noticed is that with the new system, you end up with WAY more free energy credits early on - because they're not being used to pay leaders. In 90% of my builds I used to starve for energy credits early on, now I find myself with like +10k energy credits by 2210. Which means more for sustaining a proper fleet. Before, I only started building up my military if threatened or in the 2220s, now you NEED to build up your fleets early on in order to get more influence and get those starbases before the AI does.
- On the flip side, it also means you can't do much diplomacy-wise until you finish the Expansion Phase or you have an huge fleet.
- This also means Alloys are more important early on, because you need them to build a big ole fleet AND keep fortified starbases. My capital planet is pretty much a Industrial World with some mines.

- One thing I forgot to do until a while: Get Academic Privilege as quick as possible, its another neat research bonus. Should have done this on the first day.
- My civ is geared for research, and I'm getting pretty sweet numbers, research-wise - like 12-24 months average for a tech.
- I have a bunch of non-habitable planets near me, I think like four tomb worlds too. Want to get my friendly neighboors to start migrating to my territory so I can use their race for colonization as well (what's their favorite type of planet anyway? Must find out).
- Pretty sure I outstrip everyone else near me, tech-wise. Currently the plan is to consolide, make a new friends and then plow through the Determined Exterminators on my border - almost did when they were destroying a nearby friendly civ, but I felt like my tech just wasn't there yet - had some pretty sweet guns but no cold fusion reactors to properly outfit good ships I feel.
- The Edict Fund is definitively better than the old lame-ass "Pay Influence to get edicts"
- So far my sprawl is small, barely worth commenting on.
- I wonder if "Marketplace of Ideas" policy is now worth it with the Unity Rework? Perhaps if you're drowning in Energy Credits from trade already?

I think the Unity rework is definitively an improvement.

Btw, performance is definitively better, althrough I AM using a few performance mods. Its not there yet, but its getting better. I hope they keep doing good performance work, so this game runs decently eventually.
Custodian Initiative was the best damn idea Paradox ever had for this game. We need Custodians for HOI4 and EUIV yesterday.
 
Joined
May 11, 2007
Messages
1,853,653
Location
Belém do Pará, Império do Brasil
Lmao, that game I was totes doing super well? Turns out I had acidentally set difficulty to CADET.

FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU-

Time to begin again.

And OF COURSE, I get Fanatic Purifiers as one of my neighboors, who promptly destroy the Spiritual Pacifists near me. FFS.
 
Joined
May 11, 2007
Messages
1,853,653
Location
Belém do Pará, Império do Brasil
New dev diary just dropped: https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/foru...laris-dev-diary-247-new-ways-to-rule.1516799/

Stellaris Dev Diary #247 - New Ways to Rule
Hello everyone!

In the Overlord Announcement last week we mentioned that vassalization mechanics will be undergoing some significant changes in the 3.4 “Cepheus” update. (Click here to wishlist!)

Previously in Stellaris, subjugation was rarely a more compelling option than simple conquest, and being subjugated often essentially meant a permanent decline of your empire and a “Game Over” screen in your near future. Subjects did not offer sufficient benefits nor had the freedoms necessary to be enjoyable to play.

The Scion origin from Federations was somewhat of an exception with most of the restrictions on both subjects and overlord being waived for them, but we felt that while the system was good, it could be even better. It would also be nice for the Scion to work within the rules rather than being so “special-cased”.

Some people noted that as part of the unity changes in Libra, a bit more of an argument for spinning off sectors into vassals could be made, but with the current numbers it’s generally more valuable to control those systems directly.

For today’s dev diary, I’ll start by delving deeper into the new rights and responsibilities that can appear in agreements, and some ways this makes keeping subjects more valuable.

As with all previews, numbers, text, and so on are not quite final and are still subject to change.

Negotiating Terms

Both the overlord and subject will be able to propose alterations of the exact terms of their vassalization contract if it’s a contract with another “regular empire”. The Khan, Awakened Empires, and the like do not haggle about the terms of their minions, but are much clearer about those exact terms.

Subject contracts start with a “preset”. These are the basic subjugation types that you know from before, plus a few new ones - Vassal, Subsidiary, Tributary, Protectorate, Bulwark, and so on. Presets have a list of default terms, and can have additional unique effects tied to them, like how Protectorates gain a massive bonus to research until they catch up to their overlord.

The default terms of contract presets may have changed a bit from the old system to better fit the new. We’ve done our best to ensure that anything you can do right now with your vassals remains possible. The core Negotiation system is part of the free Cepheus update, though many of the brand new terms are part of the Overlord expansion.

Negotiable terms include things such as:
  • Can the subject be integrated?
    • As a major change from current gameplay, there are no vassalization contract presets that have integration enabled by default. It must be explicitly turned on in contract negotiations.
  • Does the subject have independent diplomacy?
    • Subjects can be given complete diplomatic freedom, none, or they can have most freedoms except are forced to vote with their overlord in the Galactic Community or Federations.
  • Can the subject expand freely?
    • Once exclusively the province of Feudal Society, now you can grant your subject the ability to freely expand. You can also bar them from expansion, or impose an Influence tithe, making them spend extra Influence (which goes to the Overlord) for the right to expand into empty systems.
    • Most presets will start with controlled expansion with the influence tithe as the default term.
  • Various subsidies from the overlord or tribute from the subject.
    • These are broken into Basic, Advanced, or Strategic resource groups, and Research.
    • The values are percentages of the production of the subject - in the proposal below, our vassal is offering 15% of their basic resource production as tribute, but is receiving a research subsidy equal to 15% of the subject’s research from the overlord.
  • Are the overlord and subject drawn into one another’s wars, and if so, which ones?
    • None, Offensive, Defensive, or Both can be selected in both directions.
    • Yes, this means that wars can be declared on subjects.
  • Can the overlord build holdings on the subject’s worlds, and if so, how many?
    • The Vassal preset has a holding limit of 1, allowing you to use some holdings without Overlord. (Though you can lower it to 0 if you need to squeeze out an extra bit of loyalty.)
    • This value is an empire-wide limit - with a holding limit of 3, you can build 3 holdings across a particular subject’s worlds, not on each of their planets.
  • Does the overlord share sensor information with their subject?

Subjugation Proposal UI
Part of the Tributary agreement UI

Eladrin · Mar 24, 2022 at 09:00

" style="box-sizing: border-box; display: inline-block; max-width: 100%; cursor: pointer;">
1647946863966.png

Tributaries have many locked terms.
Others can be restricted by civics or for other reasons - for example, overlords with the Feudal Society civic cannot select the Expansion Prohibited term, must join in their subject wars to some degree, and must allow their subjects some degree of diplomatic freedom.

1647946875515.png


Different terms affect a subject’s Loyalty, and have an immediate impact as well as over time. For example, the Independent Diplomacy term grants 5 Loyalty and another +0.5 Loyalty per month. This may prove important later.

If you’re asking your subject to do something they are ideologically opposed to, those terms may cost extra loyalty, though the reverse is also true in a few cases.

1647946882865.png


The pacifists don’t like being forced into offensive wars.
Empires can propose a change in terms with a five year cooldown at a cost of some Influence. Exact costs are still being adjusted.

Proposal from our vassal
1647946898098.png


Pledge Loyalty has greater effects if the subject actually likes you for some reason.

Disloyal vassals will look for ways to be free of your tyranny, seizing the chance for rebellion should you falter.

They may also swear Secret Fealty to one of your rivals in hopes that they’ll be able to follow them in an Allegiance War.

1647946904067.png


In an Allegiance War, you seek to wrest control of the vassals that have pledged Secret Fealty to you, and they will join in on the attack on their former Overlord.

Gotta Subjugate Them All

Like herding cats, having many vassals is hard work. Constantly vying for your attention, keeping multiple subjects happy can be difficult as jealousy ruins everything. “Divided Patronage” is a modifier that reduces the loyalty of all of your vassals, and increases based on the number of vassals you have.

You can mitigate this by offering them better terms, or by taking a vassalization related civic or the Shared Destiny ascension perk.

1648024900355.png



1647946917323.png


Overlord Holdings
In Cepheus, we’re expanding the branch office system from MegaCorp to be more flexible.
The corporate tab on planets is being replaced with a more versatile “Holdings” tab. For now, we have corporate and overlord holdings available here, but we have more future plans for this screen.

Much like branch office buildings, holdings are built on another empire’s colonies and can provide benefits to both empires. Much like criminal syndicate branch office buildings, some holdings might be far more beneficial to one side than the other. Each particular holding is planet-unique,

Corporate overlords can build both holdings and branch offices on their subjects’ colonies.

Holdings (Ministry of Truth)
Eladrin · Mar 24, 2022 at 09:00

" style="box-sizing: border-box; display: inline-block; max-width: 100%; cursor: pointer;">
1647946925483.png

The Ministry of Truth provides two Overlord Propagandist jobs to the planet, which turn the subject’s Unity into Influence for their overlord…

1647946935151.png


…While holdings like the Material Ministry are disliked by subjects as the overlord claims a portion of the planet’s production for themselves…

1647946950071.png


…Still others, like the Aid Agency, are welcomed on the planet.

1647946958313.png


Hive overlords can build the most universally disliked holding (tied with one other), which takes a portion of the subject’s planet and dedicates it to a spawning complex.

We’re also adding some holdings associated with civics or origins.

1647946965830.png


The Noble Chateaus of the Aristocratic Elite allow them to send troublemakers off to bother someone else’s planet instead of their own, much to the dismay of their hosts…

1647946975807.png


…Shared Burdens empires can spread their message through Communal Housing projects. How this is received depends largely on the ethics of the subject…

1647946984764.png


…And Gaia Seeders, who are gaining more terraforming flexibility in Cepheus as described in Dev Diary #243, can also beautify the worlds of their subjects. The subjects tend to like that - unless they’re Hydrocentric, of course.

Since there are over twenty different holdings, I’ll share some more in next week’s dev diary (including a machine specific one), and some more on social media as the Overlord reveals continue (though I’ll repost those in that week’s dev diaries as well).

It’s a very versatile system that we look forward to exploring more in the future.

The Future is Ours

That’s long enough for today. Next week we’ll talk about the advanced form of vassalization coming in Overlord called Specialist Empires.

Also, starting with this dev diary, we’re creating video versions on the Stellaris Official YouTube Channel for those of you that prefer listening to them. Subscribe so you don’t miss them, and let us know what you think!

maxresdefault.jpg

Stellaris Overlord - Video Dev Diary - New Ways to Rule
Welcome to the first of our Video Dev Diary! This week Stephen Muray will walk us through some of the new cool vassalization mechanics, coming in Overlord. I...
favicon_32x32.png
pdxint.at

Click here to wishlist Overlord!
 

Riel

Arcane
Joined
Apr 29, 2012
Messages
1,357
Location
Itaca
It's curious but in my last game I changed to limited wars policy precisely to not annex any more territory but it had more to do with population growth penalty than unity or administration changes, I even created a vassal in the L cluster after colonizing it so it would populate faster, of course integrating 20 o 30 years later is a possibility. Basically I think there's a point in the game were brute growth stops being worthy unless it's heavily populated to begin with, and even then... I mean you probably are already the main star power by that stage... and having to babysit more planets is tedious. I guess I could AI control sectors. but honestly any mismanagement by the AI would trickle down to my empires numbers, if it's a vassal it's not my problem and due to AI bonuses they will provide some fleets anyway a sector has the same AI and 0 bonuses.
 
Joined
May 11, 2007
Messages
1,853,653
Location
Belém do Pará, Império do Brasil
Did you guys see the vassal contracts? I think that's one of the best take-aways coming, they're essentially allowing you to set vassal contracts like in Crusader Kings III. The CKIII Vassal Contract system FUCKS. Gimme my Crusader Kings IN SPACE!

EUIV has a lot of interesting vassal-focused features, I hope they take a lesson from some of that too.

Also I hope the holdings thing fixes the big issue of Subsidiaries being fucking useless because they're just another mega-corporation you can't build corp buildings inside.

It's curious but in my last game I changed to limited wars policy precisely to not annex any more territory but it had more to do with population growth penalty than unity or administration changes, I even created a vassal in the L cluster after colonizing it so it would populate faster, of course integrating 20 o 30 years later is a possibility. Basically I think there's a point in the game were brute growth stops being worthy unless it's heavily populated to begin with, and even then... I mean you probably are already the main star power by that stage... and having to babysit more planets is tedious. I guess I could AI control sectors. but honestly any mismanagement by the AI would trickle down to my empires numbers, if it's a vassal it's not my problem and due to AI bonuses they will provide some fleets anyway a sector has the same AI and 0 bonuses.

Ah, I guess you were avoiding conquest in order to keep your pop growth intact?
Really wish they would find a better way to revamp pop growth. To be fair to them, the Stellaris situation is kind of unprecedented in history (post-industrial space-faring species who are likely far richer than us, at least two centuries, and live longer). Its kinda hard to model that, and that's not even accounting for culture.

Worth remembering that Vassal AIs do not get difficulty bonuses, so they are gimped as hell compared to the normal AIs. I wonder if they will address that.
 
Joined
May 11, 2007
Messages
1,853,653
Location
Belém do Pará, Império do Brasil
Really wish they would find a better way to revamp pop growth.
i used a mod which would raise pop growth exponentially with resident population. after a while sorting overpopulation and unemployement became a pressing issue.

So, the more pop you have, the more pop grows?

That sounds like incline. I've always wanted something like that, having to deal with the struggles of a rising population, ending up with WH40k-style Hive Worlds and having to sort that shit out.
Right now, more pops = more gooder. There's no reason not to increase your popullation.

Did it affect your performance?
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom