Jazz_
Arcane
I can't play the potato GOTY because of potato pc.
Leave my mom out of this and I will leave yours out of the next bearded man competition.and one for jRPGs, and one for turn-based RPGs, and one for story-focused RPGs, and one for music-focused RPGs, and one for your mom.I think I would've preferred two lists, one for action-RPGs (Witcher 3, Dark Souls, Borderlands...) and one for actual RPGs.
Leave my mom out of this and I will leave yours out of the next bearded man competition.and one for jRPGs, and one for turn-based RPGs, and one for story-focused RPGs, and one for music-focused RPGs, and one for your mom.I think I would've preferred two lists, one for action-RPGs (Witcher 3, Dark Souls, Borderlands...) and one for actual RPGs.
Thing is, when you use the only logical definition of RPG - character skill > player skill -, you only need two lists. And one would include all the sub-genres you mentioned.
What is a music-focused RPG, though?
so twelve hours of cutscenes and about 500 hundreds shitty "points of interest" is what it takes to win goty on codex?
lets disregard shitty combat, braindead quest design, awful character development system and illusory c&c.
but muh graphix, muh romances, muh barons questline!!! better writting than PST!!!
wezcie spierdalajcie na wykop polaczki jebane
I know how you feel but in fact the GOTY edition with all the patches runs better then vanilla. It still remains the most demanding game out there for my potato but at least I can play it.I can't play the potato GOTY because of potato pc.
1) What kind of causality can be detected in a poll that is done without any control, no pretest or post-test measurements, like performing polling before a Josh Sawyer interview and another thereafter.
2) Where did I say this poll would be representative of anything given its endogenous nature
3) What would be excactly wrong in restricting analysis to a subsample of voters, if one is interested in their voting behavior in particular
ALSO: If you are livid because of the bloating of W3 average by the poles, why don't you provide a list of them, and it's easy to check the results after excluding them.
1. So I ask you this: how can you analyze anything it and get meaninfull results without any serious measurements? Besides like JS interview or similar events would change the poll results.
2. Your playing with numbers like they mean something, while actually you just wanted Scrooge, Bee and others to get wet because of the size of your "statistical penis".
3. Nothing it's that it's just meaningless, don't pretend that it isn't. This common board room garbage. Peeps analyze shit, without understanding it and then draw conclusions that are as good as the numbers themselves.
You think I keep records of polish residents in codex?
how is following the red trail/clicking on all available icons/watching cutscene/choosing one of two available dialogues line a great quest design? there is literally no input from the player. in novihrad there is like one fucking quest where you can fail(vampire killer). everything else is just you making the same braindead actions with geralt telling you exactly what needs to be done.so twelve hours of cutscenes and about 500 hundreds shitty "points of interest" is what it takes to win goty on codex?
lets disregard shitty combat, braindead quest design, awful character development system and illusory c&c.
but muh graphix, muh romances, muh barons questline!!! better writting than PST!!!
wezcie spierdalajcie na wykop polaczki jebane
The combat was a bit shitty but since when did that make a game less of a good RPG?
Planescape Torment, Arcanum, Vampire: Bloodlines, Fallout, Fallout 2, Fallout: New Vegas, Morrowind all had shitty combat.
The character development system was awful though, I agree. But for me, the quest design was actually great, the attention to detail, the reactivity etc all made up for it. C&Cs were only illusory if you played it with your eyes closed and your fingers in your ears.
Infinitron did this poll change your mind at all about your phrases such as "That PoE is bad is a myth perpetrated by a small, but vocal minority while the majority of the codex loves this game". Do you still believe this? I just want to measure how detached from reality you are. Did this bring you back to earth or did you fly away even further after seeing this poll?
Yeah, the only minor problem here it is not the RPG.It really is the best RPG since Fallout: New Vegas
People who voted on last year's poll but not on this one.What grade is ERK?
1) What kind of causality can be detected in a poll that is done without any control, no pretest or post-test measurements, like performing polling before a Josh Sawyer interview and another thereafter.
2) Where did I say this poll would be representative of anything given its endogenous nature
3) What would be excactly wrong in restricting analysis to a subsample of voters, if one is interested in their voting behavior in particular
ALSO: If you are livid because of the bloating of W3 average by the poles, why don't you provide a list of them, and it's easy to check the results after excluding them.
1. So I ask you this: how can you analyze anything it and get meaninfull results without any serious measurements? Besides like JS interview or similar events would change the poll results.
2. Your playing with numbers like they mean something, while actually you just wanted Scrooge, Bee and others to get wet because of the size of your "statistical penis".
3. Nothing it's that it's just meaningless, don't pretend that it isn't. This common board room garbage. Peeps analyze shit, without understanding it and then draw conclusions that are as good as the numbers themselves.
You think I keep records of polish residents in codex?
You still didn't answer my question about causality, nor representativeness.
1. Of course it's not serious measurements, it's a frikking poll about video games. The Sawyer was provided as an example of a causal intervention, not necessarily a realistic one.
2. I haven't thought of that but that sounds good. What do you think are my chances? TBH, this stuff isn't very hard or demanding, I don't think anyone would be impressed by it, just good fun.
3. It's no more meaningless or meaningful than the poll itself. It's all for good fun. I can only suspect you've never been to a boardroom or done any statistics.
lolStoryfags, storyfags everywhere, duh. Remember that PS:T is our #1 of all time, above any turn-based combat/gameplay-focused games, too. So this isn't really surprising for the Codex, even leaving aside the fact of potato infestation or any difference in actual quality between PST and W3.
In fact, AoD's 2nd place may also be partially explained by its storyfag qualities (you can play it as a non-combat game + it has some pretty memorable scenarios and characters).