Radisshu said:
Oh, Black Cat. Nothing Troika does that sort of breaks the coherency of the in-game setting would feel less like a "okay, they're pulling this out of their ass" than suddenly having the Technocracy send MiB's to Santa Monica and then nuking it.
That's a completely wrong reading of what I said. I did not say that should have happened. I said that, given the events transpiring on the main quest, a MiB encounter was much more justified, in setting, than a boss fight against a wereshark.
The point wasn't why didn't they blew Santa Monica to little bits. The point was that you can wonder, if you know the setting, where are the MiBs and their friends while that's happening. If the wereshark weren't there, meanwhile, no one will notice a wereshark could have been there. In other words, it was a pretty gratituous crossover that, from a World of Darkness perspective, added nothing and, instead, presented some possible arguments about it's consistency with the lore.
So my point only was that from a long list of possible crossovers and cameos that made sense on the context they picked the ones that did not. If you are fine with that, good for you. I haven't said you should. I haven't said they should have sent the cyborg sabertooth tigers that shoot lasers from their eyes, either. I was just saying, given the context, they could have chosen better crossovers and cameos. They could, also, have chosen to give more deep to those they made, instead. Like making the werewolves actually fight like werewolves.
Radisshu said:
My arguments rely entirely on that, but I don't think that's a problem. My point is, if the end product is good, how well the product follows lore that doesn't turn up in the game itself is besides the point.
And that's perfectly fine. And that's, also, why I said several times people on this thread failed their reading rolls. My comment was that as a game, isolated from the White Wolf franchise, it was pretty playable. It could be better, yes, and it could be worse. The first part is good, the last part is awful, and there are both elements to like and dislike. That's my opinion on the end product.
I also said that, if you are into World of Darkness and looking for a World of Darkness oficial product, that's what the game also is, it fails, badly. It contradicts canon, it presents glaring omisions, it doesn't represent at all the time period the game happens into, both the details and the themes and governing ideas could be better translated, etc.
If you only care about the end product or dislike the World of Darkness, then cool, it's a game that could be better but it's not bad at all. If you want an oficial World of Darkness product, then it's pretty bad. That's it. I did not vote
the game's awful, I did vote
it's good for what it is. Some people just can't seem to cope with criticism against Troika or their favorite game and turned a passing comment into, well, this.
Radisshu said:
And the reason I'm annoyed are lorefags who act all butthurt about a game not following the lore, when a strict interpretation of the lore would include shit that would break the game's mood completely, "for the lulz" sidequests aside.
Jesus Christ almighty. There's a big difference between it's a playable game but you are not going to like it if you are looking for a White Wolf official product and oh, god, it's an abomination, they failed to keep up with the setting. No one is butthurt about the setting. I'm just arguing because people got into a rage since someone said Bloodlines wasn't perfect. Read again the answer to the previous quote.
Radisshu said:
Maybe you'd do better if you didn't view the people arguing against you as a single entity.
Well, I'm sorry about that then. The point still stands that I never said Bloodlines was a bad game, I just said it was not a game someone looking for a World of Darkness compliant product would enjoy. And then everyone seemed to jump and read that as saying Bloodlines was a bad game
because it wasn't World of Darkness compliant.
If that wasn't the case about you, cool. I'm sorry for the misunderstanding.
CrimHead said:
LOL.
VentilatorOfDoom said:
You are not FORCED to fight them. You can do it the sneaky way. Hope that helps.
Ah, sorry. I don't like the Malk nor the Nossie so I never did that. But, then, it also makes the omision more glaring: If you can actually bypass the situation and don't make it to the headlines then, by all means, you should be punished by not bypassing the situation and making it to the headlines since your masquerade breach was completely optional and, so, it's your responsability to have screwed up.
The same could be said of other areas, like slaughtering everyone in the Elizabeth Dane, and actually LaCroix blows his top if you do that one because it was, indeed, a pretty ridiculous way to blow up the Masquerade, in particular if you just Trance them and suck them dry, or slaughtering everyone in the museum, in particular given the cameras spread around the basement.
Depending on your gamemaster both situation would also have killed your Humanity since you actually could have not done so, but that's another story.