NerevarineKing
Learned
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2021
- Messages
- 315
I can assure you there are interesting overarching plot threads.
-The villains were p. dumb. You foil their entire plan and they are like, "nah we wanted you to stop us, blow up all our stuff, kill half our guys, and give us all a severe beating." Um, okay? If your plan is to get beaten up by highschoolers that is a shitty plan. In the end I struggle to see what they even accomplished.
can we at least say the series peaked with the first Crossbell game
Man falcom works fast today
Man falcom works fast today
Hm, interesting. If one were to make a fangame, one would think that making an isometric/2D game would be the better choice. Easier to make it look good and polished with hardly any resources, time, or manpower. But for a 3D game, this is a noble attempt (even though it doesn't look good).
This guy looks cooler than most party members in this franchise.
Trails in the Sky trilogy are all good so play that.So my question is, it is worth getting back in the game and eventually in following games of the serie, or like everything today latest installments are more and more decline?
sorry i had the names confused, LOH: Trails of cold steel is the game i played for a bit. yes , the setting was the worst part . i think i looked at Trails in the sky games and the old graphic was a bit offputting. maybe i should play those first ?Trails in the Sky trilogy are all good so play that.So my question is, it is worth getting back in the game and eventually in following games of the serie, or like everything today latest installments are more and more decline?
Cold Steel has a much more "anime" feeling with academy setting and all, but I still find the series very charming regardless including the big cast and evolving world and NPC
So my question is, it is worth getting back in the game and eventually in following games of the serie, or like everything today latest installments are more and more decline?
sorry i had the names confused, LOH: Trails of cold steel is the game i played for a bit. yes , the setting was the worst part . i think i looked at Trails in the sky games and the old graphic was a bit offputting. maybe i should play those first ?
sorry i had the names confused, LOH: Trails of cold steel is the game i played for a bit. yes , the setting was the worst part . i think i looked at Trails in the sky games and the old graphic was a bit offputting. maybe i should play those first ?Trails in the Sky trilogy are all good so play that.So my question is, it is worth getting back in the game and eventually in following games of the serie, or like everything today latest installments are more and more decline?
Cold Steel has a much more "anime" feeling with academy setting and all, but I still find the series very charming regardless including the big cast and evolving world and NPC
In Cold Steel one: is there a benefit fully level up master quarts, or should I just swap to another one, if it seems better? I'm assuming swap?
CS3's problem is that it should be the payoff game. All of the setup was done in CS1 and CS2. CS3 should have been about Rean and friends fighting against Osborne from the get go. Instead we find out that they did nothing for 2 years, and we redo CS1 all over again as a new cast of characters is introduced and they have to slowly remember who they were supposed to be fighting against: Osborne. Except this time the build up isn't even engaging like in CS1. The ILF and the Noble Alliance were interesting and their chapter of the week conflicts built up the story of Erebonia. In CS3 you spend 90 hours chasing anime supervillains who have nothing to do with Erebonia and have no coherent motivations or goals.