rusty_shackleford
Arcane
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2018
- Messages
- 50,754
Ciri has all the protection she needs, an expensive heavy-duty set of plot armor.
I'm playing this for the first time, got 49 hours under my belt, and just finished a few quests in Skellige. Unfortunately the exploration system in the game is weak so now I'm just focusing on the main quest so I can finish the story. I don't recall the first two games being this way but then again I played TW1 around 12 years ago so my memory is hazy.
Did anyone else feel the Ciri parts where you play as her were out of place? Those segments could have been played out automatically through cutscenes.
I'm playing this for the first time, got 49 hours under my belt, and just finished a few quests in Skellige. Unfortunately the exploration system in the game is weak so now I'm just focusing on the main quest so I can finish the story. I don't recall the first two games being this way but then again I played TW1 around 12 years ago so my memory is hazy.
Did anyone else feel the Ciri parts where you play as her were out of place? Those segments could have been played out automatically through cutscenes.
Bless ya. You're probably starting to hit the "suffering zone" now, where everything feel a fucking chore, and the main thing keeping you going is your determination to make it through to see what the fuss is all about.
I want to see another Witcher game but I think Blood & Wine gave Geralt a perfect send off. I'd like to play as another witcher, and Ciri makes the most sense to be that person (another dude would just be compared to Geralt).
I thought Ciri wasn't a proper witcher due to not going through Trial of the Grasses? That means no enhanced reflexes, can't consume potions or see in the dark etc. She'd be a pretty gimped witcher even with her bullshit powers that W3 gave her.
Also it's supposed to be a recurring theme that the time of the witchers is coming to an end, the truly dangerous monsters have nearly all been killed off and society is becoming industrialised and organised enough to not need wandering witchers to defend them. Admittedly that's more of a book theme and W3 in particular has ancient legendary trash monsters all over the place so eh...
At the end of the day if they want to do a Ciri game they will and that stuff will be handwaved away. I'd still rather see a prequel, to see what it's like being a more normal witcher instead of the White Wolf. Eskel would be a good choice.
I want to see another Witcher game but I think Blood & Wine gave Geralt a perfect send off. I'd like to play as another witcher, and Ciri makes the most sense to be that person (another dude would just be compared to Geralt).
I thought Ciri wasn't a proper witcher due to not going through Trial of the Grasses? That means no enhanced reflexes, can't consume potions or see in the dark etc. She'd be a pretty gimped witcher even with her bullshit powers that W3 gave her.
Also it's supposed to be a recurring theme that the time of the witchers is coming to an end, the truly dangerous monsters have nearly all been killed off and society is becoming industrialised and organised enough to not need wandering witchers to defend them. Admittedly that's more of a book theme and W3 in particular has ancient legendary trash monsters all over the place so eh...
At the end of the day if they want to do a Ciri game they will and that stuff will be handwaved away. I'd still rather see a prequel, to see what it's like being a more normal witcher instead of the White Wolf. Eskel would be a good choice.
The main quest ended with another conjunction of the the spheres.
It was. None of the post-game content mentions any massive influx of new monsters all over the Continent. The Conjunction happened again on Undvik and maybe a bit in its surrounding area but it was nothing even remotely of the scale of the first one.I want to see another Witcher game but I think Blood & Wine gave Geralt a perfect send off. I'd like to play as another witcher, and Ciri makes the most sense to be that person (another dude would just be compared to Geralt).
I thought Ciri wasn't a proper witcher due to not going through Trial of the Grasses? That means no enhanced reflexes, can't consume potions or see in the dark etc. She'd be a pretty gimped witcher even with her bullshit powers that W3 gave her.
Also it's supposed to be a recurring theme that the time of the witchers is coming to an end, the truly dangerous monsters have nearly all been killed off and society is becoming industrialised and organised enough to not need wandering witchers to defend them. Admittedly that's more of a book theme and W3 in particular has ancient legendary trash monsters all over the place so eh...
At the end of the day if they want to do a Ciri game they will and that stuff will be handwaved away. I'd still rather see a prequel, to see what it's like being a more normal witcher instead of the White Wolf. Eskel would be a good choice.
The main quest ended with another conjunction of the the spheres.
Wasn't it extremely local, limited to that one island?
It was. None of the post-game content mentions any massive influx of new monsters all over the Continent. The Conjunction happened again on Undvik and maybe a bit in its surrounding area but it was nothing even remotely of the scale of the first one.I want to see another Witcher game but I think Blood & Wine gave Geralt a perfect send off. I'd like to play as another witcher, and Ciri makes the most sense to be that person (another dude would just be compared to Geralt).
I thought Ciri wasn't a proper witcher due to not going through Trial of the Grasses? That means no enhanced reflexes, can't consume potions or see in the dark etc. She'd be a pretty gimped witcher even with her bullshit powers that W3 gave her.
Also it's supposed to be a recurring theme that the time of the witchers is coming to an end, the truly dangerous monsters have nearly all been killed off and society is becoming industrialised and organised enough to not need wandering witchers to defend them. Admittedly that's more of a book theme and W3 in particular has ancient legendary trash monsters all over the place so eh...
At the end of the day if they want to do a Ciri game they will and that stuff will be handwaved away. I'd still rather see a prequel, to see what it's like being a more normal witcher instead of the White Wolf. Eskel would be a good choice.
The main quest ended with another conjunction of the the spheres.
Wasn't it extremely local, limited to that one island?
I'm playing this for the first time, got 49 hours under my belt, and just finished a few quests in Skellige. Unfortunately the exploration system in the game is weak so now I'm just focusing on the main quest so I can finish the story. I don't recall the first two games being this way but then again I played TW1 around 12 years ago so my memory is hazy.
Did anyone else feel the Ciri parts where you play as her were out of place? Those segments could have been played out automatically through cutscenes.
Good to see story-based games that are not retarded, woke or infantile selling extremely well. Mind you, it's easier to sell millions if you're basically giving the games away for like 3 or 4 bucks, but still, grats.
I remember killing their queen and them being too scared to mess with me afterwards. The tunnelers aren't going anywhere near the Mojave because it's the Courier's territoryYep.
The tunnelers come and fuck everyone up because nobody did anything about them.
...You do remember Ulysses warning that they were on their way to destroy the mojave, right?
There is quite a lot of wokeness in Witcher 3, at least in the Polish version. Most of it is pretty subtle, though. Like random comments about "traditional values" or females being "strong and independent" and capable of "taking care of themselves" or "stronger than all men in their squad".
What about the source? Have you read it? With this approach it possible to find plenty of "wokeness" there, take "lodge of sorceressess" alone, what a matriarchal shit is that?There is quite a lot of wokeness in Witcher 3, at least in the Polish version. Most of it is pretty subtle, though. Like random comments about "traditional values" or females being "strong and independent" and capable of "taking care of themselves" or "stronger than all men in their squad". I also encountered several smaller quests with those "evil patriots".
Yeah. The Sapkowski books were plenty woke, but in a good way. Same with games. It's not the cheap agenda-driven shit pushed by farleft morons.
There is quite a lot of wokeness in Witcher 3, at least in the Polish version. Most of it is pretty subtle, though. Like random comments about "traditional values" or females being "strong and independent" and capable of "taking care of themselves" or "stronger than all men in their squad". I also encountered several smaller quests with those "evil patriots".
CDPR is quite woke and since ideological fanaticism usually gets worse with time, I fully expect them to drop the subtlety in Cyberpunk.
Read all the books twice. Sapkowski had a liberal worldview, whether he knew it or not. Remember he started writing the short stories in mid 80s, when Poland was still the Peoples Republic and the divisions were quite different, than they are today. He probably didn't even realise, some of the ideas and characters would be praised by feminists 40 years later. He was likely just a cuck fantasizing about stronk women dominating him. But whether his views were clearly defined or not, he was a more traditional liberal, not the modern radical raging one.What about the source? Have you read it? With this approach it possible to find plenty of "wokeness" there, take "lodge of sorceressess" alone, what a matriarchal shit is that?There is quite a lot of wokeness in Witcher 3, at least in the Polish version. Most of it is pretty subtle, though. Like random comments about "traditional values" or females being "strong and independent" and capable of "taking care of themselves" or "stronger than all men in their squad". I also encountered several smaller quests with those "evil patriots".
One problem is everyone's definition of "woke" is different. To some a simple "hey racism is bad bro" is too woke, which is pretty silly. Both sides are way too quick to start whining when confronted by something they don't agree with.
For me it really comes down to writing. Bioware's dumb tranny in Mass Effect was bad because she was like "HEY HOW YA DOIN' I'M TRANS BY THE WAY," which was poorly written and presented. Witcher 3 has very good (video game) writing, so any messages it might be trying to send are more nuanced and well presented in general. The lack of bitching about it here for the most part bears this out. Unless most of their writing staff quit I'm sure Cyberpunk will be equally well presented, though the setting and themes of the game will likely lend themselves to content many here will be against simply existing in the game. The whiny bitching will be epic.
No, I didn't claim, having strong women in your game/film is a sign of wokeness. But repeatedly stressing, that wahmen in your game/film are "strong and independent" and capable of "taking care of themselves", especially using those exact "ritualistic" phrases is woke, though. And that is what I noticed in Witcher 3.
The only Czech princesses I know is Arabela, a lady threatened by the best villain in the history of television — Rumburak
I clearly stated, it is quite subtle in Witcher 3. Cyberpunk is a different story though, the world is in a different place now, and the signals coming from the studio are not good. I hope I'm wrong, but I'm not expecting too much restraint in the ideology department.
I clearly stated, it is quite subtle in Witcher 3. Cyberpunk is a different story though, the world is in a different place now, and the signals coming from the studio are not good. I hope I'm wrong, but I'm not expecting too much restraint in the ideology department.
The "signals" most of you rant about are things like having a diversity manager and tweeting out basic support of things like black lives matter, which every corporation does nowadays. Only possible "warning sign" I've seen is allowing you to make a trans character, but starting you off with a male or female body and then letting you do whatever the fuck you want to it is very in keeping with the setting. So is all manner of debauchery in general. If it ends up being poorly written and agenda driven then you can say "I told you so," but at the moment I think it's typical internet sandy vaginas.
‘And then what happens?’ continued Avallac’h. ‘The elves, bored with their boring elven women, start to prefer willing human women, and the bored female elf indulged in the perverse curiosity, of the human male who is always full of vigor and strength. And then something happened that no one expected and no one could explain – elves normally only ovulate once every ten to twenty years, but from mating with humans, they began to ovulate with every intense orgasm. It worked with some kind of hidden hormone or combination of hormones. The elven women understood that in practice they could have children only with humans. Its elven women that stopped us from exterminating you when we were stronger. Later you became stronger and you began to exterminate us. But you still had allies among the elven women, They were the party of convenience, cooperation and coexistence… and they did not want to recognize the reality that it was all about copulation.