Protagonist in 2015: Max from Life is Strange
Protagonist in 2025: Doomguy and Bigby Wolf
Gaming is healing????!111oneone111
Protagonist in 2015: Max from Life is Strange
They are going fuck over Bigby so hard. They have to since Fables is an inherently conservative media.Protagonist in 2025: Doomguy and Bigby Wolf
That was literally a vileWitcher 3 criticized religions adequately, like the greedy satyr, who was masquerading as their god, kept demanding more food from pisspoor starving peasants.
I'm really out of the loop and it feels good.
You recognized the AssCreed Syndie Cat guy, but failed to recognize the Bloodborne protagonist and Solid Snake? You should feel bad.I'm really out of the loop and it feels good.
From all these faces, I only recognize Batman, the AC protagonist, Geralt and Ciri.
Do you also think the Udalryk questline was a parody of Christianity? Or the Morkvarg quest where you learn he actually didn't get cursed by Freya, thus proving her worshippers literally died for nothing?That was literally a vilenecroparody of the Christian God.
That has nothing to do with the point. The greedy satyr posing as a "god" is deliberately written as an obvious parody of the Old Testament worship of YHWH, I guess it completely went over your head with its tiny little brain.Do you also think the Udalryk questline was a parody of Christianity? Or the Morkvarg quest where you learn he actually didn't get cursed by Freya, thus proving her worshippers literally died for nothing?That was literally a vilenecroparody of the Christian God.
You said the game criticized only one religion, I'm asking if you think the Udalryk and Morkvarg questlines criticized paganism or not.That has nothing to do with the point. The greedy satyr posing as a "god" is deliberately written as an obvious parody of the Old Testament worship of YHWH, I guess it completely went over your head with its tiny little brain.Do you also think the Udalryk questline was a parody of Christianity? Or the Morkvarg quest where you learn he actually didn't get cursed by Freya, thus proving her worshippers literally died for nothing?That was literally a vilenecroparody of the Christian God.
No, not at all. The cult of Freya is actually portrayed sympathetically in the werewolf quest, when they are shown to be understandably irate over Yennefer destroying their sacred garden with her literal vile necro (that even made Geralt uncomfortable). The self-harming jarl isn't connected to any particular god, it's just a generic delusion/deception. No attempt to make any moral point is made in either of those cases, it's in the category of "shit happens". Overall, paganism is portrayed fairly sympathetically, although the main underlying worldview is "muh power of secular humanism".You said the game criticized only one religion, I'm asking if you think the Udalryk and Morkvarg questlines criticized paganism or not.That has nothing to do with the point. The greedy satyr posing as a "god" is deliberately written as an obvious parody of the Old Testament worship of YHWH, I guess it completely went over your head with its tiny little brain.Do you also think the Udalryk questline was a parody of Christianity? Or the Morkvarg quest where you learn he actually didn't get cursed by Freya, thus proving her worshippers literally died for nothing?That was literally a vilenecroparody of the Christian God.
Yeah, I knew I've seen the guy before but couldn't put my finger as to where. This is probably because I've never owned a console in my life.You recognized the AssCreed Syndie Cat guy, but failed to recognize the Bloodborne protagonist and Solid Snake? You should feel bad.
Yennefer does that not because she enjoys necromancy but because she loves Geralt and Ciri so intensively, she would do anything for them. Triss would never do such a thing for him.No, not at all. The cult of Freya is actually portrayed sympathetically in the werewolf quest, when they are shown to be understandably irate over Yennefer destroying their sacred garden with her literal vile necro (that even made Geralt uncomfortable).
Yennefer does that not because she enjoys necromancy but because she loves Geralt and Ciri so intensively, she would do anything for them. Triss would never do such a thing for him.
Witcher 3 criticized religions adequately
Told you.Geralt doesn't believe in the existence of gods, but he is still friends with that Melitele priestess, which is a partial concession to paganism.
I think it's Batman, Snake (Metal Gear), Assassin's Creed, Bloodborne(?), Geralt. Ciri looks a lot like that female viking from Valhalla and very unlike herself from previous games. No idea who the rest are. But I guess this is what happens when you don't use staple characters for your game (Batman, Geralt and Snake are pretty much like a brand by now).I'm really out of the loop and it feels good.
From all these faces, I only recognize Batman, the AC protagonist, Geralt and Ciri.
She's not Geralt.I'm sick of her already just by reading all that.
So far Geralt on the stories appear to be more of an expression of a particular point of view. It's less about what he wants as a individual and more about what he is and what his circumstances are but i guess we'll see if that changes later on.
She is taking his place.
She takes responsability and doesn't hesitate to put herself at risk of dying multiple times for Ciri and Geralt. Not only that but she saved Geralt twice (once by resurrecting him after getting stabbed in the back by a pitchfork and the last time by teleporting out of danger after he killed Eredin), single-handedly found the way to treat Avallac'h curse to find Ciri and helped Geralt to find Ciri which in turn, satisfied Emhyr enough from torturing him for failing his task.Hmm, but she does it deliberately refusing to tell him the truth, without soliciting his consent or asking for forgiveness or even understanding.
Even more importantly, she’s a colossal Bitch on Wheels all the time.
I don't think some people here realize that CDPR games have always been fanfiction of Sapkowski's work, and you shouldn't compare books to games since they're vastly different from one another.Geralt in the books appear to be one cynical bastard so far. I mean, so is everybody else around him but he appears to go one step further than the rest.
Even if they were fanfiction, they should still remain within the bounds of that fiction. Ironically enough, one of the reasons why Geralt's reactions were somewhat limited (by CDPR's own admission) was because they wanted to keep him in character, instead of being just a skin for the player to wear in-game. That's why Geralt doesn't have the option to be a murderhobo, like it is possible in most other cRPGs.I don't think some people here realize that CDPR games have always been fanfiction of Sapkowski's work, and you shouldn't compare books to games since they're vastly different from one another.
I just saw a youtube thumbnail of a video on a movie called "Cleaner", being "Die Hard with a girl boss", and it dawned on me what's wrong with Witcher 4's trailer and with every girlboss trailer, and why these guys are doomed to lose.
It's biology. Both men and women like looking at men with furled brows, the image makes him look confident. Yet nobody likes the look of a woman with furled brows and bared teeth. This just makes you want to leave her alone.
(((They))). Do. Not. Care. At. All.Only men can be Witchers
You'll have female witchers, black elves, gay angels, tranny kings/queens, hindu Thor, Chinese Julius Ceasar, bipoc king Arthur, Goddess-Empress of Womankind, etc., stepping on your face, forever. Only psychopathic villains will be cishet White men, everyone else will be somewhere high up on the oppression/intersectionality matrix.
Or, just don't consoom woke goyslop. You can do nothing, and win.
They are going fuck over Bigby so hard. They have to since Fables is an inherently conservative media.Protagonist in 2025: Doomguy and Bigby Wolf
edit - unless of course the Fables author has control...which I hope he does as I'd rather not see Bigby or Fables in general be "re-imagined for modern audiences".
You are trying to draw conclusions too soon, after reading just couple of short stories. Geralt is an expert in lying to himself. In his essense he is idealist, but he is knowing to well he is not in a position to be one. He also wouldn't want to be associated with those pitiful, preaching fucks. This causes contradictions in his behavior. I would say he is spiritual, he would never exclude the existence of metaphysics. With time I am more and more certain Geralt is Sapkowski's self insert, at least partial.I guess fatalist would be a better word than nihilist to describe Geralt now that i think of it.
In either case, the author's atheism is showing.
Is that.... Bruce Wayne?