Barrow_Bug
Cipher
Pretty snoresome characters too IIRC.
TisATrap said:The wilderness is filler, if you don't think so you must love Oblivion because there is virtually no difference between BG1 wilderness and Oblivion quests and dungeons.
There was less exploration but Athkatla by itself would make up for the loss because that city feels so much more lively than any of BG1 cities : I take quality over quantity. I prefer a city filled with quests and stories than lots of little cities with one or two quests to do and NPC which serve no purpose. The guilds and interaction in the city are what made it so great.
More like "fillderness".Ogg said:That's no "filler", that's "wilderness"
DraQ said:More like "fillderness".Ogg said:That's no "filler", that's "wilderness"
*DraQ gains 20xp for successful coinage*
Umm...Major_Boobage said:DraQ said:More like "fillderness".Ogg said:That's no "filler", that's "wilderness"
*DraQ gains 20xp for successful coinage*
You are reaching Kingcomrade levels of wittyness....
The Feral Kid said:TisATrap said:The wilderness is filler, if you don't think so you must love Oblivion because there is virtually no difference between BG1 wilderness and Oblivion quests and dungeons.
This is the moment where a giant stamp is delivered on your forehead that reads "asshole".
You probably belong to some cult that has re-defined the words "quantity" and "quality" by exchanging their meaning . I can't find any other possible explanation for your incredibly dumb comment. The only thing that Athkatla and BG 2 in general has more than BG is quantity, not quality.
TisATrap said:So you actually believe that BG1 was better than Oblivion ? Could you precise in what way, because I don't see it.
TisATrap said:So you actually believe that BG1 was better than Oblivion ? Could you precise in what way, because I don't see it.
I mean it in the sense that BG2 had less areas to explore but much more content in what area it had. Quests like those given by the thieves guild were much more complete than the filler content of BG city. BG city was as big (bigger ?) than Athkatla and the BG1 map had ton of areas to explore but very little to actually do.
Mareus said:Seriously,... talking about decline of the codex. Comparing BG to Oblivion and even saying that Oblivion is better is the new low which I never expected from you guys. I guess it all comes down to complaining for the sake of complaining. Seriously, do you people even enjoy playing games anymore?
Anyway, about BG. First, BG is somewhat weaker game than BG2, simply because forests look similar and the characters are not fleshed out. That being said, BG remains one of the best games ever created. Some of you complain about story and forests that all look the same, but the story is actually very thought out. I would even dare to say it is better than BG2 story. The plot has some political things with a sinister foreboding in the air about something much darker than it may seem in the first glance. Forests may look similar, but they are not the same. Every forest has different geography, different encounters and different things to discover and the reward for exploration is much greater than in most games. You complain about writing, but writing in BG is superb. It's sometimes witty and sarcastic, but never over the line. Compare the writing of BG with anything made in recent years and tell me which game comes close to the quality of writing.
And one thing that BG does better than any other game of the recent years is combat which is just pure fun. Music is perfect for the genre, characters are a bit shallow when compared to BG2 characters like I said, but luckily mods fix this, so there is really nothing to complain about, expect the forests which get tedious after a while. However I would give crazy amount of money for a game of BG quality if it came out today, but instead of BG we get collar grabbing Sheppard and Dragon Age which in my honest opinion looks more like NWN2 than spiritual successor to BG.
Even the graphic in BG is amazing considering the game's age. Furthermore there are mods which allow you to fix the game in any way you like. So why not complain about things that really sucks like lack of real choices and consequences (although there is C&C in BG and even after playing the game 10 times, I still haven't had exactly the same playthrough), instead of spitting shit on a gaming legend that overshadows anything done in recent years. Just because BG is different than everyone favorite Planescape Torment, it does not mean BG sucks. It's just different and when it comes to fantasy setting, no other game beats BG trilogy. NWN2 is good, especially MoTB, but as a whole BG Trilogy beats the shit out of NWN2. i am mentioning NWN2, because so far it is the only game that could be compared with BG. It's certainly more comparable than Oblivion.
The Feral Kid said:decline of the decline
characters are a bit shallow when compared to BG2 characters like I said, but luckily mods fix this
Furthermore there are mods which allow you to fix the game in any way you like.
Mareus said:That being said, BG remains one of the best games ever created.
Edward_R_Murrow said:Okay, this is one of the patently stupid things about Baldur's Gate...goofy rewards for pixel hunting. It's not fun, and it's just dumb.
SCO said:
Bg is actually much better than the epic illogicality of BGII (lets not talk about ToB).
I mean that druid/shapechangers quest? On a "filler" area. Meeting Viconia - "filler" area. Charming bandits and necromancers to get more background than BGII ever throws at you? On a "filler" area.
It seems that the codex needs a fucking quest per meter ratio before they promote a game. Wah wah, there is too much walking.
Fuck.