So it's Bretonnia with weaboo aesthetics, completely unneeded.And just as Bretonnia has its neat Arthurian & Celtic-inspired stuff, Nippon can have its share of neat Shinto-inspired stuff.
So it's Bretonnia with weaboo aesthetics, completely unneeded.And just as Bretonnia has its neat Arthurian & Celtic-inspired stuff, Nippon can have its share of neat Shinto-inspired stuff.
А legendary hero of which faction? They are probably going to release Neferata and Nagash as either two separate lord packs or them together. They usually release 2 lords that are opposed to each other, so Neferata vs Nagash works fine as a DLC.Nagash as a Legendary Hero akin to Ariel would be nice.
0 in WH1, 20.9 in WH2.I was wondering - how much time do you guys have clocked in TW:WH and TW:WH 2?
I was wondering - how much time do you guys have clocked in TW:WH and TW:WH 2?
never played wh1, i bought it on discount to get the mortal empires map. got 368 hours in wh2.I was wondering - how much time do you guys have clocked in TW:WH and TW:WH 2?
Ok. The reason I'm asking is because I have 250 h in WH1, and barely started WH2 to check it out (90mins) once after I bought it in 2020.
I've aimed to play at least one campaign with every legendary lord. So every time I get remotely hyped about WH, I just play some more of WH1 for another ~30-50 hrs. I've won the campaign with the Dwarfs (June 2016 according to the achievement date), Vampire Counts (June 2016, probably my wife actually - I'm sure I won it too but don't remember when), Empire (March 2020), Bretonnia (April 2020), then I got burnt out in 2020 by the time I played with the Wood Elves.
My point is that at this rate, I have enough Warhammer to play until I retire. I don't see myself buying WH3 before 2023 at the earliest. I was wondering how much gameplay time you have accumulated because I feel far from experienced. WH is just a huge game. And I don't count playing the WH2 campaign as an excuse for not playing the WH1 campaign.
I must be in the minority because ever since Rome I, my impression has been that TW isn't meant to handle large campaign maps, and the AI can't cope with them. After all, the original game was about Japan, immensly more simplistic, and truly "total war" oriented. So I've never been very optimistic about what the ME campaign would amount to. I think TW is at its best for region-sized campaign maps like various issues dealing with Britain (Viking Invason, MTW2:Kingdoms).The selling point is the mortal/immortal empires campaigns. Which has a bigger joint map with more factions. Vortex campaign in 2 and now the chaos campaign in 3 are really just side-attractions and a springboard for DLCs than anything else.
I was wondering - how much time do you guys have clocked in TW:WH and TW:WH 2?
yes its the worst thing i have ever seenAlso this triggers me:
View attachment 22927
Here is a trueI was wondering - how much time do you guys have clocked in TW:WH and TW:WH 2?
View attachment 22926
Also this triggers me:
View attachment 22927
Here is a trueI was wondering - how much time do you guys have clocked in TW:WH and TW:WH 2?
View attachment 22926
Also this triggers me:
View attachment 22927no-liferconnosieur. :D
BTW, I watched this Mortismal review of WH3. What impressed me most was his calmness when he went on to talk about the sieges. I remember times when TW community members would become outraged when they are being sold a $60 game that is partially non-functional with regard to what it has been marketed as.
To be fair, it's not like anyone else is making the kind of games Paradox or CA are making, so if you're not going to suffer their shit, where else are you gonna get your fix?I make bad life decisions when it comes to games.
I must be in the minority because ever since Rome I, my impression has been that TW isn't meant to handle large campaign maps, and the AI can't cope with them. After all, the original game was about Japan, immensly more simplistic, and truly "total war" oriented. So I've never been very optimistic about what the ME campaign would amount to. I think TW is at its best for region-sized campaign maps like various issues dealing with Britain (Viking Invason, MTW2:Kingdoms).
I even have a semi-scientific theory on why this is so.
For me WH1's campaign has the best atmosphere and campaign map graphics. I've heard they've improved the campaign map graphics and lighting in WH2, which may induce me to give it another try.
I'm still slowly buying DLC lords when they are discounted.
I don't think I've ever played this non-pirated.I make bad life decisions when it comes to games.
As for sieges, the trick where the AI has better armies than you and attacks you while you siege is invaluable. Not only do you spare yourself the accosting tediousness of the tower defense minigame, you also get to fight them in the open where they lose all advantages. A+ design.
I was wondering - how much time do you guys have clocked in TW:WH and TW:WH 2?
View attachment 22926
Also this triggers me:
View attachment 22927
Fuck sake lads. This game had the stink of SHIT all over it prior to release. You knew it was gonna be a mess with the delay that they did and it's infested with Denuvo malware to boot.
Yet you keep buying this crap.