Trigger the codex with a statement.

[Zenithsan]

Games, as any other art, are a privilege of the moral person, not an act of expression.

So, if you want to make a videogame, your first though should always be: Is this game up to the standards of the current moral values of the present society?

If the answer is no, you should learn to be more attuned with the correct side of the Overton Window values. Speak to the movement leaders, and if they give you their approval, you then can try to make the game again.

Once the creative process is going on, always ask yourself this question before taking any design choice: Is this decision up to the moral standards of my chosen value system?
If the answer is no, return to the previous stated solution.

 

[Üstad]

Fallout 1-2 have shit combat and broken skills. The game would never even make top 10 if it was created during 2010's.

Morrowind is not a popamole.

Moral alignment system is dumb and childish.

 

[Morenatsu.]

I fap to all the monsters in all the RPGs evarrr!!!!

 

[Darth Canoli]

Peasants didn't get married at all. Marriage was always associated with property and peasants didn't have property, they were property, so there was no point marrying them.

Also, most certainly nobles raped peasants all the time.

I'm not an historian but from what I've read, marriage existed already during antiquity and probably as far as villages and organized communities go.

Peasants got married as well but during the early middle-age, there were no marriage ceremonies, even for nobles whom just exchanged rings, there is probably some differences depending on countries, period and social status (royal weddings maybe).

In some countries, for peasants, living together was enough to validate the marriage.

 

[Chippy]

Peasants didn't get married at all. Marriage was always associated with property and peasants didn't have property, they were property, so there was no point marrying them.

Also, most certainly nobles raped peasants all the time.

I'm not an historian but from what I've read, marriage existed already during antiquity and probably as far as villages and organized communities go.

Peasants got married as well but during the early middle-age, there were no marriage ceremonies, even for nobles whom just exchanged rings, there is probably some differences depending on countries, period and social status (royal weddings maybe).

In some countries, for peasants, living together was enough to validate the marriage.

You see folks: if Sawyer had made a historically accurate autist RPG, the average Codexian would have creamed their pants. What kind of RPG fag are you? Clearly the whole Codex is all about detailed accuracy.

 

[ferratilis]

Pathfinder games (or any other computer RPG based on tabletop rules) shouldn't have granular difficulty options. There should be only one default level of difficulty, which is core rules. That way, noobs wouldn't bitch about bloated enemy stats because they picked the difficulty not suited to their knowledge and got filtered, and hardcore players wouldn't have to take pickpocket background and dip into monk on every fucking character, thus enabling diverse builds and better role playing. And it would also allow for better encounter design.

 

[Morenatsu.]

its the same picture

 

[Bruma Hobo]

Name me one major right wing group that romanticizes feudal peasantry in America.

The Catholic Church.

 

[Reinhardt]

its the same picture

yes, unironically. she's just using cute make up app on second pic.

 

[Jason Liang]

 

[FriendlyMerchant]

The emphasis on writing and "reactivity" in evaluating rpgs has lead to mediocre games being highly overrated.

 

[KateMicucci]

The emphasis on writing and "reactivity" in evaluating rpgs has lead to mediocre games being highly overrated.

Most RPGs are pretty shit when you boil it down to just the gameplay.

 

[Darth Canoli]

The emphasis on writing and "reactivity" in evaluating rpgs has lead to mediocre games being highly overrated.

It worked for Fallout and PST.
So this has nothing to do with that.

Woke illiterate (pleonasm) wannabe writers and YYY companies hiring them are the cause.
This and wanting to focus on low quality narration, writing and fake reactivity at the expense of the actual gameplay.

 

[Sykar]

Dragon Age: Inquisition is pretty alright.

Sera agrees!

 

[FriendlyMerchant]

The emphasis on writing and "reactivity" in evaluating rpgs has lead to mediocre games being highly overrated.

It worked for Fallout and PST.
So this has nothing to do with that.

Woke illiterate (pleonasm) wannabe writers and YYY companies hiring them are the cause.
This and wanting to focus on low quality narration, writing and fake reactivity at the expense of the actual gameplay.

Fallout and PST are overrated.

 

[rusty_shackleford]

The emphasis on writing and "reactivity" in evaluating rpgs has lead to mediocre games being highly overrated.

rpgs are shit because of women

it's the one constant in basically every shit rpg

 

[FriendlyMerchant]

The emphasis on writing and "reactivity" in evaluating rpgs has lead to mediocre games being highly overrated.

rpgs are shit because of women

it's the one constant in basically every shit rpg

If only that were the entire case.

 

[octavius]

Playing RPG games is for kids and nerds.

 

[Yaksha]

Dead money is better than base game new vegas, lonesome road is better than dead money.

 

[KateMicucci]

Pathfinder games (or any other computer RPG based on tabletop rules) shouldn't have granular difficulty options. There should be only one default level of difficulty, which is core rules. That way, noobs wouldn't bitch about bloated enemy stats because they picked the difficulty not suited to their knowledge and got filtered, and hardcore players wouldn't have to take pickpocket background and dip into monk on every fucking character, thus enabling diverse builds and better role playing. And it would also allow for better encounter design.

 

[FriendlyMerchant]

And it would also allow for better encounter design.

You need a competent designer for that.

 

[Morenatsu.]

The ideal game appeals to neither casuals nor tryhards.

 

[Kruyurk]

The ideal game appeals to neither casuals nor tryhards.

It is because casuals are into cRPG whereas tryhards are into tRPG. Totally different audiences.

 

[Morenatsu.]

The ideal game appeals to neither casuals nor tryhards.

It is because casuals are into cRPG whereas tryhards are into tRPG. Totally different audiences.

What does that have to do with what I said...?

Oh, I see what you mean. JRPGs are the best!

 

[Bigg Boss]

Rings of Power is really good and if you do not like it you are racist and probably problematic.