data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4e5c/f4e5c5ba871d5d8f3608550222832e8252cae043" alt="Edgy"
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2017
- Messages
- 33,635
The absolute best we can hope for is a mechanically average game with a story that is only mildly woke. Like TOW. Forgotten about in 3 months. Like all those recent vampire/Lovecraft walking sims.
I hate this saying. If you care so little about something you worked on for months if not years to give it a shitty cover then I'm going to judge you for itDon't judge a book by its cover
We haven't seen any new footage in a long time.is this game gonna be good
i'm not reading your autistic back and forth over 300 pages just give me the qucik rundown of the current impressions
You say that like it's a bad thing.LoL you naive summer child,it is tranny/trap!
is this game gonna be good
i'm not reading your autistic back and forth over 300 pages just give me the qucik rundown of the current impressions
is this game gonna be good
i'm not reading your autistic back and forth over 300 pages just give me the qucik rundown of the current impressions
Good... bad... who knows. What I do know is it'll be worth playing, because so few of these types of games are made.
That's like saying catching an Std is good because it's so rare.
You say that like it's a bad thing.LoL you naive summer child,it is tranny/trap!
That's like saying catching an Std is good because it's so rare.
Codex lulz and all that, but I don't get the analogy. Deus Ex/Bloodlines/Prey style games are good things, STDs are not. If STDs were enjoyable then yeah, I'd take herpes over nothing. Can't always shoot for full blown AIDs.
That's like saying catching an Std is good because it's so rare.
Codex lulz and all that, but I don't get the analogy. Deus Ex/Bloodlines/Prey style games are good things, STDs are not. If STDs were enjoyable then yeah, I'd take herpes over nothing. Can't always shoot for full blown AIDs.
But you're presupposing the game will be good purely because it belongs to a certain genre. Or claims to - We've not seen actual gameplay so it could be anything from a faithful recreation of Bloodlines 1 to a first person popamole to a walking sim with Stat checks.
But you're presupposing the game will be good purely because it belongs to a certain genre. Or claims to - We've not seen actual gameplay so it could be anything from a faithful recreation of Bloodlines 1 to a first person popamole to a walking sim with Stat checks.
But you're presupposing the game will be good purely because it belongs to a certain genre. Or claims to - We've not seen actual gameplay so it could be anything from a faithful recreation of Bloodlines 1 to a first person popamole to a walking sim with Stat checks.
But you're presupposing the game will be good purely because it belongs to a certain genre. Or claims to - We've not seen actual gameplay so it could be anything from a faithful recreation of Bloodlines 1 to a first person popamole to a walking sim with Stat checks.
It can't possibly be worse than Deus Ex: Invisible War, and that game was worth playing (and even replaying) for the same "immersive sims are rare" reason.
I was contemplating giving IW a replay recently myself. I kind of enjoyed it when I played it on release, but it was a really disappointing follow up to the original.
See if you can beat my time of 44 minutes.But you're presupposing the game will be good purely because it belongs to a certain genre. Or claims to - We've not seen actual gameplay so it could be anything from a faithful recreation of Bloodlines 1 to a first person popamole to a walking sim with Stat checks.
It can't possibly be worse than Deus Ex: Invisible War, and that game was worth playing (and even replaying) for the same "immersive sims are rare" reason.
Funny you should mention that. I'm the one person who liked that game and I was just thinking a few minutes ago that when I finish my GMDX run I'll replay it and then write a post defending it. Or maybe I'll finally see how shit it is. Who knows.
Correction m’lady: we have seen gameplay. Including NPCs with strange rigor mortis.That's like saying catching an Std is good because it's so rare.
Codex lulz and all that, but I don't get the analogy. Deus Ex/Bloodlines/Prey style games are good things, STDs are not. If STDs were enjoyable then yeah, I'd take herpes over nothing. Can't always shoot for full blown AIDs.
But you're presupposing the game will be good purely because it belongs to a certain genre. Or claims to - We've not seen actual gameplay so it could be anything from a faithful recreation of Bloodlines 1 to a first person popamole to a walking sim with Stat checks.
IW has no excuse to be like that because it is not the only game that came out on Xbox. Star Wars Republic Commando was an Xbox game and has great looking environment. Hell, backported Xbox HL2 looks okay. Practically any PC-Xbox game of that era looks and works better than IW.If you can get past IW's technical and scope shortcomings due to it being made for Xbox it has a lot of appealing stuff in it. Still the worst immersive sim ever made though.
Dun dun DUMng NPCs with strange rigor mortis.