Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

World of Darkness Vampire: The Masquerade – Bloodlines 2 from Hardsuit Labs

jackofshadows

Arcane
Joined
Oct 21, 2019
Messages
5,231

"no one was asking for" means "unpopular" obviously and "yet oddly it fits" kinda discard thinblood shmucks. So, I'd say... it's someone like Ash or Tommy Flayton (food critique). I'd prefer someone like Misti tho :(
 

Wesp5

Arcane
Joined
Apr 18, 2007
Messages
1,972
It's one of those memes that have apparently been lost to time. Regardless, Caine's personality and motivations in Bloodlines outright contradict the description of Caine as given in the Gehenna book (not the novel, the one with multiple endgame scenarios). They provided players with multiple (admittedly lousy) "canon" endings, but Caine's personality is fixed.

So the Gehenna book contradicted the novel and both were supposed to be canon? What a mess :)! So how is Caine's personality in the book? In the novel he said that he sometimes left his cave in spirit to look at his childer and this might be exactly what he did in Bloodlines.
 
Last edited:

Wesp5

Arcane
Joined
Apr 18, 2007
Messages
1,972
The point is, that within the game, the taxi driver is Caine, because writer said that it's Caine.

Although I believe this myself, where did a writer actually say it? The internal links are unclear on purpose, like only the Malks recognize him and we all know that they are crazy. The sound folder being called Caine is not a statement of the writers, only another hint.

Deckard is replicant because the author said he is replicant and you can't change that.

Where and especially when did Scott say that? I always had the impression that Deckard was a human during filming and Ford confirmed he played him as one, and then afterwards Scott thought it might be cooler if he was a replicant and retconned it for the director's cut. Similar to that Vader wasn't Lukes father in A New Hope and Leia was not his sister in The Empire Strikes back, although Lucas latter claimed that he always planned it that way...
 

Storyfag

Perfidious Pole
Patron
Joined
Feb 17, 2011
Messages
18,093
Location
Stealth Orbital Nuke Control Centre
Codexian:
"That's not Caine! That's cannot huppan in my interpretation of lore! Writer is liar and wrong!"
White Wolf themselves said it was wrong, and they control the canon.

White Wolf themselves approved the horribu Gehenna novel, foreverafter denying themselves any say in what is canon and what isn't.
 

Storyfag

Perfidious Pole
Patron
Joined
Feb 17, 2011
Messages
18,093
Location
Stealth Orbital Nuke Control Centre
Why even bother writing in an established setting with established characters if you're not going to respect anything about it?

It's one of those memes that have apparently been lost to time. Regardless, Caine's personality and motivations in Bloodlines outright contradict the description of Caine as given in the Gehenna book (not the novel, the one with multiple endgame scenarios). They provided players with multiple (admittedly lousy) "canon" endings, but Caine's personality is fixed. Troika botched it.

Compare and contrast, for my amusement. As, for the moment, you are full of shit.
 

fantadomat

Arcane
Edgy Vatnik Wumao
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
37,604
Location
Bulgaria
I do hope that it is the guy with the unicorn blood that i send to kill the president.....i made good dosh out of him.
It would be great, indeed. But I'm afraid it'd be too wacky for a generally serious sjw tone :negative:
Oh yeah,i know that the game will be progressive libtard garbage,not expecting anything good out of it. Tho the thread here will be pretty fun.....it already was :).
 

yes plz

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
2,159
Pathfinder: Wrath
The returning character will be Romero. He'll ask for sex again and this time the only options will be:
1: No.
2: Hell no.
3: Fuck no.
4: *Kill him*
 

Teut Busnet

Cipher
Patron
Joined
Dec 31, 2016
Messages
976
Codex Year of the Donut
The point is, that within the game, the taxi driver is Caine, because writer said that it's Caine.

Although I believe this myself, where did a writer actually say it? The internal links are unclear on purpose, like only the Malks recognize him and we all know that they are crazy. The sound folder being called Caine is not a statement of the writers, only another hint.

Deckard is replicant because the author said he is replicant and you can't change that.

Where and especially when did Scott say that? I always had the impression that Deckard was a human during filming and Ford confirmed he played him as one, and then afterwards Scott thought it might be cooler if he was a replicant and retconned it for the director's cut. Similar to that Vader wasn't Lukes father in A New Hope and Leia was not his sister in The Empire Strikes back, although Lucas latter claimed that he always planned it that way...
In the book, Phillip K Dick doesn't say anything about Deckard being a Replicant. There are no hints either way, IIRC.

I think you're correct about the movie. More info in this excellent re:view
 

Modron

Arcane
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
11,170
The returning character will be Romero. He'll ask for sex again and this time the only options will be:
1: No.
2: Hell no.
3: Fuck no.
4: *Kill him*
Don't forget the option of reporting him for the masquerade violation of hitting on you.
 

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
36,925
White Wolf themselves approved the horribu Gehenna novel, foreverafter denying themselves any say in what is canon and what isn't.

They approved Bloodlines as well. :M

Compare and contrast, for my amusement. As, for the moment, you are full of shit.

Wherein my memory appears to be somewhat shot but the point remains the same.

tyRTjME.jpg

pEHVfQO.jpg


Official White Wolf canon was that Caine could already be dead or not even real, so cab driver cannot explicitly be Caine. Troika went with "active but unknown" but "delicately", it wasn't. He comes across as the deus ex machina they warned gms not to use.
 

Storyfag

Perfidious Pole
Patron
Joined
Feb 17, 2011
Messages
18,093
Location
Stealth Orbital Nuke Control Centre
Official WW recommendations leave it up to the individual GM, as evident by the scans you posted. Assigning any fault to Troika in this case is a fallacy, as they have picked one of the four options and ran with it. Within the context of Troika's Chronicle, known as Bloodlines, the cab driver explicitly *is* Caine, and it is supported by the tools provided by White Wolf to any GM.

Now, you claim that Troika wasn't delicate enough, contrary to White Wolfs warnings. How are Caine's actions unsubtle? What is it that he does by his own hand?
 

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
36,925
Official WW recommendations leave it up to the individual GM, as evident by the scans you posted. Assigning any fault to Troika in this case is a fallacy, as they have picked one of the four options and ran with it. Within the context of Troika's Chronicle, known as Bloodlines, the cab driver explicitly *is* Caine, and it is supported by the tools provided by White Wolf to any GM.

Now, you claim that Troika wasn't delicate enough, contrary to White Wolfs warnings. How are Caine's actions unsubtle? What is it that he does by his own hand?

Leaking details of the sarcophagus: fine
Setting up a new vampire to manipulate: also fine
Cheating at the game by giving his pawn inflated stats over time: not fine
 

DalekFlay

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Oct 5, 2010
Messages
14,118
Location
New Vegas
In the book, Phillip K Dick doesn't say anything about Deckard being a Replicant. There are no hints either way, IIRC.

Ridley Scott is great at visuals but not too good at narrative. Deckard being a replicant ruins the whole point of the story, because it's about a human finding his humanity again thanks to not-humans. Anyway, Scott did say his intention was Deckard being a replicant but that you can take it however you want. The sequel doesn't say either way, and the director of that said it's up to the viewer.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom