I 90% expect to get a shitty & cheap combat focused "rpg" with a preachy woke shit for a story, something in between the Vampir and Swansong.You guys still think this game's gonna be playable, huh?
I 90% expect to get a shitty & cheap combat focused "rpg" with a preachy woke shit for a story, something in between the Vampir and Swansong.You guys still think this game's gonna be playable, huh?
Doesn't matter what one may think of the modern day Mitsoda, but he sure had a better chance to make a decent Bloodlines games, than a bunch of nobodies who had the game basically forced upon by the owners, all under Paradox supervision lol.
those fuckers even say they are not taking the original for the inspiration too much, seriously.
Im cautiously optimistic but there have been far too many delays with this game for me to commit to an official BruceVC " this game is going to be epic "You guys still think this game's gonna be playable, huh?
True, but she said what she said some time after already quitting the PR job, afair.
You are in the wrong thread if you want to talk about this topic, this is a bloodline 2 thread.Video games?
Most straightforward implementation would've probably been something like diablerizing some Sabbat elder in torpor and getting to pick the clan that he's supposed to have once you do that. And since that iteration of VtMB2 would've (presumably? confirmed?) featured only playable Camarilla-affiliated clans akin to the original game, it also explains why other vamps would take less of an issue with your act of diablerie since you'd be diablerizing a despised antitribu.There is a certain appeal to being a thinblood and choosing your clan by actively plotting to commit diablerie on a Kindred of a specific clan. It's a more active, in-game approach to obtaining a clan as opposed to passively waiting for the sire to choose you. Somewhat reminiscent of WoD Dracula not being Embraced by Ruthven's choice, but by capturing the elder vampire, turning him into a bitch, and forcing him to do the Embrace.
There's no way that's how it would've gone down in the HSL game, though.
You still have Tremere in the Sabbat,Tremere don't have antis so the only acceptable way to become one would be the diablerize a neonate from a rival sect that had been supplied for you by the local chantry.
As of 1998, the original Tremere antitribu were considered extinct thanks to a mysterious ritual, undertaken by Tremere in Goratrix's body, that burned the antitribu to ash in a single night. As far as the original Tremere and the Camarilla were concerned, that was the end of the traitors; while any Tremere could in the future defect from the Clan and undergo the Vaulderie, these were not explicitly considered antitribu. Rather, they were just seen as Tremere with Sabbat allegiance.[8]
However, contrary to Tremere propaganda, the antitribu were not entirely destroyed: some antitribu avoided the acquisition of the cursed mark entirely, and a few of those that did have the cursed mark also survived the ritual that killed the others. While their numbers were few at best at the turn of the millennium, the Tremere antitribu lived on, even if many of these "survivors" were actually Telyavelic Tremere that had, from the start, faked having the cursed mark and masqueraded as regular Tremere antitribu.
You still have Tremere in the Sabbat,
Paradox flew her out to PAX West to promote Bloodlines 2, she never quit anything. She has community dev for World of Darkness right there in her twitter profile.True, but she said what she said some time after already quitting the PR job, afair.
It's not like we a have a lot of sources to choose from. She is a fan of the original game and one of the few who played the HSL version and commented on it.
All opinions are subjective, especially when one cannot contractually go into details to explain theirs. Still, if the game was a total shit, she could always have said nothing or use more neutral terms to describe it.
True, but she said what she said some time after already quitting the PR job, afair.
Outstar is not working for Paradox anymore? That is news to me. Do you have a source?
That would make sense as well, although you still need some way to obscure their clan so that it doesn't feel too gamey when you get to pick your own clan by diablerizing them.* Perhaps they'd go into torpor after committing the mass embrace in order to regain their strength and/or to remain undetected until things settle down and you end up stumbling upon them as such.You still have Tremere in the Sabbat,
There even is a Tremere firemage in the original Bloodlines. I always guessed that after finding the originator of the illegal mass embrace you were allowed to Diablerize him in Bloodlines 2...
True, but she said what she said some time after already quitting the PR job, afair.
Outstar is not working for Paradox anymore? That is news to me. Do you have a source?
By the way, what were her job qualifications other than being a hardcore fangirl?
I think she got it because she was the only one who put out a palatable YouTube channel on World of Darkness that wasn't a total cringefest.
Not only that, but the Tremere pyramid was broken. In V5 the opening act of the Second Inquisition was to attack the Tremere Big Chantry, and now there's Tremere sects everywhere. And the problem is that what happened to the Tremere is also happening on a bigger scale, everywhere else.You still have Tremere in the Sabbat,Tremere don't have antis so the only acceptable way to become one would be the diablerize a neonate from a rival sect that had been supplied for you by the local chantry.
while any Tremere could in the future defect from the Clan and undergo the Vaulderie, these were not explicitly considered antitribu. Rather, they were just seen as Tremere with Sabbat allegiance.[8]
It's not just about high generation characters. An individual Elder may or may not choose to change sects, same as everyone else. It's down to their personal history.The fragmentation of in game factions is meant to support thin blood / high generation characters. It gives them more autonomy and makes it less likely they'll be scourged or enslaved.
This is one of the best results of V5.Clan-sect allegiance seems to be no longer on the basis of assumption but ascertained on an individual basis.
My point was more like: "You're doing the same thing in Bloodlines 1 (including guns and melee weapons)". While a thinblood is weaker, he is still a vampire and as such remains superior to humans. So being able to beat humans with guns and weapons is not that surprising. It is also worth taking into consideration that games are seldom realistic in terms of how many enemies you can fight (and beat), and is rarely representative of the setting in that aspect, too.The bloodlines 1 guy was a low generation fledgling. Probably 9th generation. That puts him in the same seniority tier as most modern elders.
The thin blood guy is 14/15th generation and depending on how you interpret the rules, he would have trouble mending wounds or sustaining extended discipline use.
No need to be so vulgar, faggot.You can type "shit" in here, no need to worry motherfucker.