Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Game News We Stripped Stuff Because Origins "Was Busted"

Jaesun

Fabulous Ex-Moderator
Patron
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
37,431
Location
Seattle, WA USA
MCA Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech
Re: Mike Laidlaw: We Stripped Stuff Because Origins

Jabba The Laidlaw said:
I still firmly believe that RPGs do need to be more accessible to new players. Not dumbed down, not "consolized" (whatever that means. There are insanely complex games on the console), not diminished, but made less imposing and less terrifying to new players. In part because I want more people to play Dragon Age, and in part because there have been a lot of improvements in gameplay and UI design in the past 15 years, and we can learn from them

Enjoying your new directives from your masters eh?

And He thinks they have learned from cRPG's in the past and improved them?

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

He needs to quit BioWare and become a full time comedian.
 

IronicNeurotic

Arbiter
Joined
Dec 2, 2010
Messages
1,110
Re: Mike Laidlaw: We Stripped Stuff Because Origins

Jaesun said:
Enjoying your new directives from your masters eh?.

Those are his "old" directives.

Don't forget he had a big role on Jade Empire and lead the console version of Dragon Age: Origins.
 

Regdar

Arcane
Joined
Apr 24, 2011
Messages
665
Drakron said:
Regdar said:
I know absolutely nothing about Laidlaw ...

Looking at his credits the earliest mention is on "special thanks" in Hoards of the Underdark, he is listed as one of the Lead Writers of Jade Empire so I suspect he was hired for the Jade Empire and then moved to the Dragon Age team ... but how the fuck he managed to became "Dragon Age Franchise Lead Designer" is beyond me, considering positions like that is very much EA ... and considering the corporate model of EA ...

As the poster above me mentioned, this guy was the overseer of the console port of Dragon Age: Origins. That was around the time Brent Knowles, the lead designer for the PC version, quit his job, supposedly because he didn't like the way the company was taking the franchise (consolized shit way).

So I guess after eating a plateful of shit for making a crappy port (it was criticized for having awful controls and sold poorly), Laidlow decided to take his frustrations out on the franchise by shifting the main development to consoles, with a shoddy PC port being quickly thrown together at the end of the development cycle.

Or maybe he just doesn't give a shit and does whatever his overlords tell him. Whatever the case it's pretty much rock solid that this guy is a douchebag.

By the way, this Brent Knowles guy has an interesting blog http://yourothermind.com/
 

Volourn

Pretty Princess
Pretty Princess Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Mar 10, 2003
Messages
24,986
"b) insanely complex like Madden amirite?"

Madden is a lot more 'complex' than the vast majority of RPgs - espicially 'old skool' ones. LMFAO

P.S. DA1 360 version is superior to the PC version.

I also laugh hilariously at Codexers whining abnout *anyone* being arrogant, douches, or full of themsleves. that describes 99% of the fukkin' posters here FFS.
 

Azalin

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Mar 16, 2011
Messages
7,562
Engrish_Major wrote:
No, like I stated before, the memory limitations alone on consoles can't hold enough textures to be able to replicate Crysis 1.
whoDat_whoDat wrote:
thats why they dont need the memory PS3 has a little something something called Blu-Ray. and its 25 times the size of a petty 2gb SD RAM

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 

Trojan_generic

Magister
Joined
Jul 21, 2007
Messages
1,566
Strap Yourselves In Codex Year of the Donut Codex+ Now Streaming!
Volourn said:
Madden is a lot more 'complex' than the vast majority of RPgs - espicially 'old skool' ones. LMFAO

I know, but is it the game that is complex or the sport that is complex? I must confess that I haven't played any Maddens (because I'm not interested in football), but other EA sports games not so long time ago. If it is like in the others, I can imagine that there are a lot of character attributes that can vary, making it complex. But I'd think it is a game that you play mainly out of interest for the sport, not because it is such a great game.

Also, what I should have written in my previous post already, are there any other 'insanely' complex games for 360?
 
Joined
Apr 4, 2007
Messages
3,585
Location
Motherfuckerville
Volourn said:
P.S. DA1 360 version is superior to the PC version.

Bro, I'm not so sure. I played the 360 version of DA:O and it was just sloppy. Long loading times, lots of stutters, terrible controls (they added a realtime hotkey function for spells but no pause outside of the ability wheel, making it impossible to make multiple positioning moves; wish they would've ditched the KOTOR controls and just made an overhead control mode with a thumstick serving as a shitty mouse substitute), and a lot of unique bugs (Exclusive Content for Microsoft Xbox 360™ amirite?).

I know they had some under-the-hood differences, like the 360 version supposedly being harder or something, but yeah, the 360 version wasn't a great port at all.
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
7,428
Location
Villainville
MCA
How can Madden be complex? It's a fucking straightforward KwanBall game FFS. Characters can have all the behind-the-scenes complexity to define their sportive qualities and how formations and positions play out based on those stats but gameplay-wise, it is just straight fucking KwanBall. There's no complexity to it beyond the complexity of the real sports game.
 

Black

Arcane
Joined
May 8, 2007
Messages
1,873,126
VZZuY.jpg
 

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
36,693
Laidlaw's a busta. Even one of the ME writers knows more about good game design than he does:
On the flip side, when we do need to make an area more challenging, he was quite clear that adding more of Generic Bad Guy 6 or increasing the hit points for Generic Bad Guy 6 does not actually make a fight harder. It makes a fight longer, which means that if you had a dull, easy fight before, you now have a dull, easy fight that takes longer to finish. When we decide to make a fight harder, we'll do it by changing the AI pattern or adding different creature type, not just by plunking down more of the detault bad guys.

I think that what it comes down to, as in all things, is the engine. If you have a good engine, you can make good hard combat. If you have a bad engine (or an unfinished or untested good engine), the best approximation of hard combat you can get is average combat against guys with more health.
The difference between somewhat-competent people using a halfway decent engine and functional retards using Eclipse/Lycium. Why does he still have his job?

Regdar said:
Based on the way he talks, however, I'm willing to bet you a large sum of money that this toolbag sold used cars or fax machines or those things you see on telemarketing at some point in his life. He wasn't actively searching for a career in video games, but then the opportunity presented itself and he thought "what the hell, it beats my old job/being unemployed" and through rigorous bootlicking and sexual favors for male superiors, got to where he is now.
He started off as a game journalist.

Edward_R_Murrow said:
I know they had some under-the-hood differences, like the 360 version supposedly being harder or something, but yeah, the 360 version wasn't a great port at all.
Actually it's easier. No friendly fire on normal, 50% on hard, and some of the larger battles are done in waves instead of one large group (love those memory limitations). I think Volourn likes it because it has the superior codex presentation.
 

sgc_meltdown

Arcane
Joined
May 8, 2003
Messages
6,000
I see they're sticking with the bethesda 'wait our previous game was shit and disregard whatever we said before that'' defense of innovation
 

Kaanyrvhok

Arbiter
Joined
May 1, 2008
Messages
1,096
villain of the story said:
How can Madden be complex? It's a fucking straightforward KwanBall game FFS. Characters can have all the behind-the-scenes complexity to define their sportive qualities and how formations and positions play out based on those stats but gameplay-wise, it is just straight fucking KwanBall. There's no complexity to it beyond the complexity of the real sports game.


If a videogame is balanced enough to where it moderately mimics the processing of any of the major team sports then it’s going to be a very complex videogame.
 

Data4

Arcane
Joined
Sep 11, 2005
Messages
5,559
Location
Over there.
racofer said:
Exactly, turn-based games require no skill. It doesn't require the player to think fast or react fast at all.

:M

Anyone remember back in the good old days when something like that could be seen as an OBVIOUS troll? I mean, I'm not a fan of turn-based play myself, but it's just a preference and has nothing to do with player skill.

There is a good reason why I don't have a "Kill All Morons" button.
 

Kaanyrvhok

Arbiter
Joined
May 1, 2008
Messages
1,096
Kaanyrvhok said:
villain of the story said:
How can Madden be complex? It's a fucking straightforward KwanBall game FFS. Characters can have all the behind-the-scenes complexity to define their sportive qualities and how formations and positions play out based on those stats but gameplay-wise, it is just straight fucking KwanBall. There's no complexity to it beyond the complexity of the real sports game.


If a videogame is balanced enough to where it moderately mimics the processing of any of the major team sports then it’s going to be a very complex videogame.

Roguey said:
Actually it's easier. No friendly fire on normal, 50% on hard, and some of the larger battles are done in waves instead of one large group (love those memory limitations). I think Volourn likes it because it has the superior codex presentation.

Hard was harder because it didn't have pause movement. The Xbox version was worse but it was certainly harder. Imagine playing Baldur's Gate without pause movement and thats all you need to know.

Trojan_generic said:
Also, what I should have written in my previous post already, are there any other 'insanely' complex games for 360?

Nothing that I know of.

Most of the top shooters on the Xbox could be noted for their depth. Even though they are simple in their design they are balanced and well crafted. Shadowrun was up there. It was cross platform and some of the best clans were beating the mouse with controllers. The best shooters are like that. Teamwork and strategy beats individual marksmanship. Halo Wars isn't very complex but little is wasted because its well balanced.
 
Joined
Nov 12, 2009
Messages
191
I love how everything this guy puts out seems to go "I know we made a bad game and you players raised many points and you are right, but you are wrong and should like it and we will continue to improve the awesome."
 

Kashrlyyk

Scholar
Joined
Jan 24, 2010
Messages
112
Exactly, turn-based games require no skill. It doesn't require the player to think fast or react fast at all.

There actually exists a computer player that has never heard of "Chess"??????????????????
Or did he and he really thinks you don't need skill to win in "Chess"????????????????
That is definitely a new high on the "stupid remarks" scale.
 

DalekFlay

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Oct 5, 2010
Messages
14,118
Location
New Vegas
As some others have said I really wonder how he got the job of running the franchise, and perhaps more importantly why he is keeping it after DA2 sold and reviewed much worse than DA1.
 

Jaime Lannister

Arbiter
Joined
Jun 15, 2007
Messages
7,183
Kashrlyyk said:
Exactly, turn-based games require no skill. It doesn't require the player to think fast or react fast at all.

There actually exists a computer player that has never heard of "Chess"??????????????????
Or did he and he really thinks you don't need skill to win in "Chess"????????????????
That is definitely a new high on the "stupid remarks" scale.

Twitch skill is actually really important for multiplayer games to stay competitive since the strategy in most multiplayer games is closer to Rock-Paper-Scissors than Chess.

Actually twitch skill makes every game harder, or would you say this looks easier than turn-based chess?
 

sirfink

Scholar
Joined
Sep 10, 2008
Messages
290
The Codex can be so fickle.

I thought most folks here thought Dragon Age Origins was shit. So we're mad at Bioware for making shit even shittier.
 

Data4

Arcane
Joined
Sep 11, 2005
Messages
5,559
Location
Over there.
Jaime Lannister said:
Kashrlyyk said:
Exactly, turn-based games require no skill. It doesn't require the player to think fast or react fast at all.

There actually exists a computer player that has never heard of "Chess"??????????????????
Or did he and he really thinks you don't need skill to win in "Chess"????????????????
That is definitely a new high on the "stupid remarks" scale.

Twitch skill is actually really important for multiplayer games to stay competitive since the strategy in most multiplayer games is closer to Rock-Paper-Scissors than Chess.

Actually twitch skill makes every game harder, or would you say this looks easier than turn-based chess?

Yeah, but the original quote was referring to RPGs. Of course good twitch reflexes are a plus in shooters.
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
7,428
Location
Villainville
MCA
Kaanyrvhok said:
If a videogame is balanced enough to where it moderately mimics the processing of any of the major team sports then it’s going to be a very complex videogame.

Major team sports, you say. I take it that "minor team sports" wouldn't be complex at all, then?

And no, it's not. It will have a complex coding perhaps, complex algorithms and whatnots built into the game but the way it plays will be anything but complex since it's a fucking sports game.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom