A game' genre is defined by the game's mechanics, not how you decide to play it.
Sure, game mechanics.
Have you played games like Might & Magic 6 or Wizards & Warriors? Here is Wizards & Warriors where your party of 6, including an elephant man, is carried by a single horse:
As you point out in this thread, there's no mechanical difference between a "party" and a single character equivalent in this "blobber". It's literally the same mechanical game.
That's exactly why "blobber" isn't a genre. There's no difference.
How is this a blobber? Plays exactly like any given "blobber", because the game mechanics are exactly the same.
Indie - Morgana - a cutesy-Lovecraftian pixel blobber
Only one character. No party.
And this is one of the main reasons absolutely everything you say on this topic has no value.
I don't care about your opinion. Why did you think your opinion matters? You've had plenty of opportunity to present a case, and all you've done is appeal to emotions.
Are you a woman or just a bitch?
It's interesting that the people who use it all have the same definition, stated multiple times in this thread already, and yet your Roomba level brain hasn't grasped it yet.
Then my posts have that over your posts; they're interesting.
Even so, you're wrong and there's nobody here with the exact same definition of the term.
What's with all these dumbfuck 300 post accounts crawling out of the woodwork? So many sockpuppets and alts or people who are genuinely retarded? We may never know.