- Joined
- Jun 18, 2002
- Messages
- 28,363
Yeah but it's not like anything is over there.
I do not use the WYSIWYG editor so have not witnessed this phenomena. Is it possible to get a video or series of screenshots with before / after?
Though it's highly likely I won't be able to do shit about it, as it seems it'd be an issue with tinymce - the WYSIWYG editor. And that's all JavaScript and shit and a whole different ball game.
Use the fixed-width option.
Try this fix:Of course, I'm at work and on a Windows computer.
Does it in Firefox too, apparently.Try this fix:Of course, I'm at work and on a Windows computer.
Don't use IE.
A small greasemonkey script will do that for youIs there a way to turn these buttons off? It's a damn eye sore.
Tell me if you like the front page at that resolution. I just changed the layout so that 1280 is basically the minimum working width now.This is what Diablo 3 looks like on a 1024/768 screen:
Works fine for me, as I can fit both the right-hand boxes with Menu and Headlines on the screen along with the main content without having to scroll. If you want to keep it locked at 1280 you might want to stretch the header to fit, as it seems to be set at 1024 still. See images:Tell me if you like the front page at that resolution. I just changed the layout so that 1280 is basically the minimum working width now.
Yeah, you don't have ads. I can tell you now the ad fixes that.Works fine for me, as I can fit both the right-hand boxes with Menu and Headlines on the screen along with the main content without having to scroll. If you want to keep it locked at 1280 you might want to stretch the header to fit, as it seems to be set at 1024 still.Tell me if you like the front page at that resolution. I just changed the layout so that 1280 is basically the minimum working width now.
Yeah, it's why the gallery creates 500 px wide images by default. Working on getting it back online soon.These are minor issues compared to humongous images breaking the layout in the review article and making it almost unreadable on this res.
Or you could just not pin.Yeah, that's more because we've had multiple things at once. The pinning system was really only designed with one item being pinned at a time in mind. And certainly not having pinned items all the time. Where-as we're now posting 2 or 3 content items a week that all get pinned. Putting the latest content thing up the top is part of trying to alleviate that.