data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc31a/bc31a2c977a061ab540dc78f70984524dfa5a494" alt="Self-Ejected"
Bubbles
I'm forever blowing
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2013
- Messages
- 7,817
It would if everyone wasn't Bi in the game.
Hawke's mother was a cishet.
It would if everyone wasn't Bi in the game.
It would if everyone wasn't Bi in the game.
If you are going to move from one site to another as soon as it gets corrupted, one day you will run out of sites where to go.
IPv6 allows 3.4×10^38 addresses. So not gonna happen soon.
That wasn't an attack on free speech. You simply ran afoul of restrictions that already were there, that you hadn't noticed before because up to this point your views were comfortably compatible with the corporate mainstream.
And she was murdered.Hawke's mother was a cishet.
It would if everyone wasn't Bi in the game.
Hawke's mother was a cishet.
And she was murdered.Hawke's mother was a cishet.
http://archive.is/tlJCsFrom the Beamdog Forum.
"Just a note, since it seems to have been ignored: the tweets you're referencing were deleted, and no response was given from either Anita or the (incorrectly mentioned) Jezebel. It was an honest mistake, which has since been remedied."
"Honestly I would hope they would also apologize for their unprofessionalism regarding this stuff. Calling femfreq, Jezbell etc for help via social media was just really stupid."
"I've apologized for this a couple times here on the forums. The tweet you're referring to was deleted shortly after it was posted."
They keep talking about some tweeting that caused a controversy, they even end up apologizing for that tweet, did anyone save it before they removed it?
http://archive.is/tlJCsFrom the Beamdog Forum.
"Just a note, since it seems to have been ignored: the tweets you're referencing were deleted, and no response was given from either Anita or the (incorrectly mentioned) Jezebel. It was an honest mistake, which has since been remedied."
"Honestly I would hope they would also apologize for their unprofessionalism regarding this stuff. Calling femfreq, Jezbell etc for help via social media was just really stupid."
"I've apologized for this a couple times here on the forums. The tweet you're referring to was deleted shortly after it was posted."
They keep talking about some tweeting that caused a controversy, they even end up apologizing for that tweet, did anyone save it before they removed it?
Deleting it did fuck all, the damage was already done by dragging the bulk of SJW vs GG into SoD.
It's a lot more than one, dumbfucks. You keep bouncing between me/carl/sjw bullshit/gg bullshit/the actual game. It's great. Far more entertaining than the game itself. The original of course, not the bastarded revision.
Who's Carl? That crazy Planescape Torment and Daggerfall fanboy?
YesCome to think of it, Crapdog just invented a new level of "activism" - not only they bitch about imagined slights, but they do so in imaginary worlds.
Come to think of it, Crapdog just invented a new level of "activism" - not only they bitch about imagined slights, but they do so in imaginary worlds.
I actually think your view is simplistic and very naive.This is a bit of a simplistic view. Consider that the company is giving you the very avenue in which you wish to express yourself in the first place. If they really wanted to deny you the opportunity, they could just cease operations, and there would be nothing you could do about it. All they owe you is what they agreed to provide in their Terms of Service, which you entered willingly. This holds true specially when alternative services are readily available (and they typically abound in the internet). It's a bit far fetched to state that they're "attacking people's right to express their opinions" when all they're doing is providing a platform which you're willingly electing to use.
1. I haven't broken any terms of service and was banned. So when you say that "all they owe me is what they agreed to provide me in terms of service" - well they failed doing that.
2. The only reason Metacritc has any influence on people's choices is because people believe that they will get a fair quick overview of the product - not skewed by politics, payola, etc. That is the whole idea behind the site. If Metacritic can remove any dissenting opinion they disagree with or because X-company payed them to do it, then that undermines the whole concept of their site.
3. Journalists and review sites such as Metacritic have a moral obligation to be neutral - otherwise they are nothing more than propaganda machines.
Basically what you are arguing boils down to this: - Metacritic has terms of service, but they can break those terms of service at their own prorogative. They have no moral obligation to do anything. If you don't like it, go somewhere else - there are plenty of other sites you can use!
Yes son, there are plenty of other sites I can use, but you missed the point I was making. My argument never was that the free speech has been removed. My argument was that this is an attcak on free speech. If you are going to move from one site to another as soon as it gets corrupted, one day you will run out of sites where to go. As I said, I think you have to be a complete dunce in order not to see the damage SJWs have done to freedom of speech, and Metacritic banning people on behalf of Beamdog is just another example of these attacks.