Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Baldur's Gate Baldur's Gate 2 is vastly overrated

Volrath

Arcane
Patron
Joined
May 21, 2007
Messages
4,299
While the narrative details can be argued about, the entire journey was awesome... especially to a 10 year old.
Are you saying you beat BG2 at 10 years old? Are you a russian chess grandmaster too?
They don't call it baby's first RPG for nothing.
 

perfectslumbers

Arbiter
Joined
Oct 24, 2021
Messages
1,202
BG2's writing is nothing amazing but it absolutely shits on the writing of most games (or even movies or television) that come out nowadays.
 

smaug

Secular Koranism with Israeli Characteristics
Patron
Dumbfuck
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
7,147
Location
Texas
Insert Title Here
Baldur's Gate is far superior to Baldur's Gate II. Where is Lilura when you need her.
I hate this discussion because both games are shit although for different reasons. BG2 was BioWare’s overreaction to the criticism’s of the first game. I think the best additions were the updated companions (regardless of whether you liked them or not) and mid-level D&D’s combat complexity is a bit more interesting than BG1’s mostly banal fights. Too bad all the other additions were just poorly implemented.
 

NJClaw

OoOoOoOoOoh
Patron
Joined
Aug 30, 2016
Messages
7,621
Location
Pronouns: rusts/rusty
Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture
While the narrative details can be argued about, the entire journey was awesome... especially to a 10 year old.
Are you saying you beat BG2 at 10 years old? Are you a russian chess grandmaster too?
You seriously think a 10-year-old can't beat BG2? How hard do you think it is to select the blue spells, click on your characters, and then select the red spells and click in the general direction of your enemies?
 

JarlFrank

I like Thief THIS much
Patron
Joined
Jan 4, 2007
Messages
34,593
Location
KA.DINGIR.RA.KI
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
I played through BG2 at 12 even though I didn't understand D&D rules (didn't have a manual, it was a pirated copy, and games I played before that had higher armor be better so I never equipped armor as it reduced my AC).

Back then I was mostly a pirate, getting my games from a Romanian friend.
The games were in English, and I was nowhere near fluent in the language yet.
We didn't have manuals, just raw burned CDs with the game's installer on them.
We even had to properly install a crack before the game would work!

Yet we managed to finish all these complex RPGs just by intuition alone.

Even modern kids could do it if their parents were less retarded and less helicoptery.
 

Vic

Savant
Undisputed Queen of Faggotry Bethestard
Joined
Oct 24, 2018
Messages
5,760
Location
[REDACTED]
I played through BG2 at 12 even though I didn't understand D&D rules (didn't have a manual, it was a pirated copy, and games I played before that had higher armor be better so I never equipped armor as it reduced my AC).

Back then I was mostly a pirate, getting my games from a Romanian friend.
The games were in English, and I was nowhere near fluent in the language yet.
We didn't have manuals, just raw burned CDs with the game's installer on them.
We even had to properly install a crack before the game would work!

Yet we managed to finish all these complex RPGs just by intuition alone.

Even modern kids could do it if their parents were less retarded and less helicoptery.
did you use cheats?
 

Beans00

Erudite
Shitposter
Joined
Aug 27, 2008
Messages
1,778
While the narrative details can be argued about, the entire journey was awesome... especially to a 10 year old.
Are you saying you beat BG2 at 10 years old? Are you a russian chess grandmaster too?


I'm born in 92, I played and beat bg1 before bg2 was released(so 8-9 years old), and I beat bg2 maybe a year after it was released by the time TOB was out(so again 9-10 years old)

Never dropped the difficulty lower then normal, they aren't hard games. BG1 the only fights I recall giving me trouble was the boss of the cloakwood mines, the bounty hunter in beregost early game and the stupid cultist battle AFTER you beat durlogs tower when you go back to town. Obviously lots of deaths to various fire and frost arrows but those don't really count.

BG2 had much more artificial difficulty, enemies that could only be harmed by x type of damage, or only normal weapons, or only +3 or +4 weapons(the balrog thing in the underdark). Spellcaster fights were never hard just rock paper scissors shit.
I remember some of the early game lich's giving me the most reloads, and the end game (the elf city with all those stupid golems and hell) being annoying. TOB was very cancer but by that point you're pretty OP yourself so it wasn't particularly difficult just tedious.




Whenever I read people talk about the baldurs gate games being difficult I get genuinely flabbergasted. I wouldn't say I'm particularly good or bad at games but to me these were always easy tier. Like do people not understand you just need to throw buffs on yourself then rest and throw more buffs on? That's 90% of success in the IE games. I mentioned on some other thread I knocked out bg1/2 ee(I replayed them a year or two ago) in 45 hours each on the hardest difficulty and rusty_shackleford seemed to take this really personally and started doing his forum spamming thing and started crying about how I rushed through the game?

Like if you take longer then 50 hours to play these games and 80-90% complete them on the hardest difficulty you're either
A) Haven't played any rpg's before in which case fair enough
B) Actually retarded, either because you suck or read at the level of a 6 year old.



I had a game on my super nintendo called Demon's crest, kind of a metroid/castlevania/megaman hybrid by capcom, good game. That game legitimately took me longer to beat through all my deaths and reloads then both baldurs gates combined around the same age.
 

Vic

Savant
Undisputed Queen of Faggotry Bethestard
Joined
Oct 24, 2018
Messages
5,760
Location
[REDACTED]
I’m impressed

BG2 was the first RPG I remember playing and honestly I don’t think I’ve made it out of Irenicus’ dungeon.

Then again, I only got into RPGs later in life and RTS games is what I loved playing as a kid before I discovered MMOs.

Maybe I’m underestimating how smart kids are. Because I did beat Age of Mythology and other RTSs around that time. Loved the greek hero stories.

I mentioned on some other thread I knocked out bg1/2 ee(I replayed them a year or two ago) in 45 hours each on the hardest difficulty and @rusty_shackleford seemed to take this really personally and started doing his forum spamming thing and started crying about how I rushed through the game?

sounds like rusty alright
 

Beans00

Erudite
Shitposter
Joined
Aug 27, 2008
Messages
1,778
PC Rpgs aren't games I've ever found particularly difficult. I should say I never played any wizardry or ultima games or goldbox games(except for wiz 8 which wasn't so much difficult as it was boring to me). Those games are obviously probably harder then anything later but I've always had the impression they mostly act as time sinks.


Off the top of my head the only rpgs I never finished as a kid purely because of difficulty were

Thunderscape(made by ssi, was like a really shitty buggy 3d goldbox game)
System shock 2(I think I only beat this game when I was 16-17)
Hammer & sickle(russian game by the guys who made silent storm) played this at 13-14 and could never come close to beating it.


Maybe another one or two I'm forgetting but those are the ones that stand out. Frankly I thought clearing out the enclave at the end of fallout 2(the concept of leaving your party members behind so you wouldn't get attacked didn't occur to me as a kid) was much more difficult then anything in bg1/2.
 

Vic

Savant
Undisputed Queen of Faggotry Bethestard
Joined
Oct 24, 2018
Messages
5,760
Location
[REDACTED]
I should say that I didn’t get hooked on BG2 not because of the difficulty but because I thought it was really dry and creepy, those people in the test tubes still haunt me to this day
 

JarlFrank

I like Thief THIS much
Patron
Joined
Jan 4, 2007
Messages
34,593
Location
KA.DINGIR.RA.KI
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
I played through BG2 at 12 even though I didn't understand D&D rules (didn't have a manual, it was a pirated copy, and games I played before that had higher armor be better so I never equipped armor as it reduced my AC).

Back then I was mostly a pirate, getting my games from a Romanian friend.
The games were in English, and I was nowhere near fluent in the language yet.
We didn't have manuals, just raw burned CDs with the game's installer on them.
We even had to properly install a crack before the game would work!

Yet we managed to finish all these complex RPGs just by intuition alone.

Even modern kids could do it if their parents were less retarded and less helicoptery.
did you use cheats?
I didn't have internet so I didn't even know how to cheat.
 

smaug

Secular Koranism with Israeli Characteristics
Patron
Dumbfuck
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
7,147
Location
Texas
Insert Title Here
People who think 10 year olds can't beat games probably didn't play games when they were 10 years old.
I don’t know man, I was dumb as fuck when I was 10. I couldn’t even beat most of my Xbox and Ps2 games and they were designed for children.
 

Sunri

Liturgist
Joined
Apr 16, 2020
Messages
2,919
Location
Poland
I completed BG I when i was 8 those games are not hard it was in Polish tho my brother wanted to kill me after i accidentally overwrote his save lul
 

polo

Magister
Joined
Jul 8, 2014
Messages
1,737
I beat BG2 at 12, same situation as jarlfrank, pirated game, no manual, no idea wth d&d was, didn't know shit about the rules, but i did enjoy my shiny spells. I probably beat the game not even knowing how the rules worked for thac0, weapon level and shit.
I must say i probably toned down the difficulty one level, but not sure.
 

Rhobar121

Scholar
Joined
Sep 22, 2022
Messages
1,287
Thac0 is stupid and illogical.
Still, I don't know what's so hard about it. When I played bg, I had absolutely no idea about 2e.
It seemed completely wrong to me that better armor gives less defense, so I figured out quite quickly that the less the better
 

jungl

Augur
Joined
Mar 30, 2016
Messages
1,476
The best baldurs gate 2 experience is blind without knowing any of the dnd rules. You pick a class like dwarf barbarian that kites enemies for your wizards fireball. Weeeee it looks cool seeing little man run fast then tank a fireball. This games awesome!

Playing the game with knowledge of rule set and min max mindset. Wow this shit is so unbalanced crap let me just roll a kensai and have this paladin spam dispel to get through this shit game!
 

Volourn

Pretty Princess
Pretty Princess Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Mar 10, 2003
Messages
24,990
Beating games- even hard ones - isn't hard at 10 years old. Afterall, most people gaming 30-40 years ago were my generationish so we were all mostly young. If a 10 year old can deal with games older than BG and their billshit, a mid 90s game was definitely manageable.


I do find it funny when people call a game 'easy' or 'not that hard' then talk about how they died multiple times. Lol If you reloaded, it wasn't that easy. In pnp, no second chances. If you died fighting the guy in front of the inn the game wasn't easy for you. PERIOD.


Beans00 is big example. Claims BG2 wasn't hard. Talks about reloading a bunch. Fukk off, dude. Just own it. It was hard for you. And, creatures needing certain weapons to be hit is a) not cheating b) no more artificial than any other rule and c) should not matter as the game gives plenty of ways to deal with such enemies. Part of the game is dealing with them. So, stop the bullshit.


"I only reloaded 765 times against the kobold in Irenicus' dungeon. It wasn't hard." - Beans00


Lmfao
 
Last edited:

Beans00

Erudite
Shitposter
Joined
Aug 27, 2008
Messages
1,778
Beating games- even hard ones - isn't hard at 10 years old. Afterall, most people games 30-40 years ago were my generationish do we were all mostly young. If a 10 year can deal with games older than BG and their billshit, a mid 90s game was definitely manageable.


I do find it funny when people call a game 'easy' or 'not that hard' then talk about how they died multiple times. Lol If you reloaded, it wasn't that easy. In pnp, no second chances. If you died fighting the guy in front of the inn the game wasn't easy fir you. PERIOD.

I never played PnP because all the people who played it seemed like freaks. It was probably even worse in the 80s/early 90s when you were in high school.





When I consider a game hard I think of dr wily in mega man 7, or the hedge maze map in jagged alliance 2. Ie sections of the game or bosses that took me an entire afternoon(or whatever) of reloading.

Dying 3 times doing the naskel mines because of fire arrow crits, or having my party leader randomly insta killed by a mind flayer once isn't 'difficult' unless you genuinely think the only way to call a game easy is to 100% it without dying.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom