Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Baldur's Gate Baldur's Gate 3 Early Access Thread [GAME RELEASED, GO TO NEW THREAD]

Joined
Jan 21, 2023
Messages
3,593
even if it makes no sense at all to have them alive in the time frame of the third game.
Blame 5E. Given a choice between carrying on with 4E canon or doing the right thing and retconning it out of existence, WotC picked the worst of both worlds and gave it the soft reboot treatment, wherein a second magical bullshit calamity means that most of your favourite 3E characters may or may not have been resurrected in the continued timeline, depending on whatever the authors need at any given moment.
This reboot also removed the BG novelizations from canon, so you win some, you lose some.
 

ItsChon

Resident Zoomer
Patron
Joined
Jul 1, 2018
Messages
5,386
Location
Երևան
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
I don't disqualify it. I merely think other RPGs are better at being... RPGs. While Baldur's Gate is a great example of tabletop RPG turned into a computer game (which alone suffices for it to be considered an RPG), it plays more like a tactical game with fairly minimal RPG elements outside of that, rather than the actual RPG. And this gets even worse when you compare Baldur's Gate to Icewind Dale. Or Planescape: Torment.
Just because an RPG might have more RPG elements doesn't mean it's better at being a RPG. I might argue that the few RPG elements Baldur's Gate has are executed so well that they surpass Fallout with its many different RPG elements which are all done at a mediocre or even subpar level.
It does some things better, certainly, but which things it does better can be considered questionable.
Eh, questioned by you maybe. Fallout does barely anything well. Outside of the music and atmosphere, I can't really think of anything it does really well.
1) Shit combat is shit, there is no doubt about it.

2) That said, isn't the situation you described exactly the case with Planescape: Torment (with writing elevating the game as a whole)? And that's not just my opinion - there are a plenty of people on the Codex who share my opinion that Planescape: Torment is great RPG, except the combat part.
Those Codexer's are wrong. Planescape: Torment's combat is not shit, it's just not engaging or interesting. Thankfully, the combat is super easy and can be done without any difficulty at all, and sometimes it's even kinda fun to steamroll through creeps with big spells. It's not intrusive to your gameplay experience. Compare that to FO on the other hand? Due to the fact that it's turn based, everything is so painfully slow. It takes forever to go through fights and there are a lot of them.
Certainly. I will point out I don't have problem with Baldur's Gate's RPG elements. More with how they were handled, compared to RPGs made by Black Isle Studios or Troika. That's literally it.
What is your issue with how they were handled?
...?

I played the game pretty much exclusively in first-person perspective. Unless you mean using melee, but it doesn't make it "third person shit", considering out-of-combat exploration can take place in FPP.

Besides, my point isn't even that Bloodlines is [this] good, just that you can have initially buggy or unfinished games ending up as classics of the genre.
Third person and first person are both shit is my point. And I agree that a game can be initally buggy but end be patched up and turn out good. I tried to play Arcanum in 2019 though, and I still couldn't get it to work on my computer. Where is this unbroken version of Arcanum so I may finally play it longer than a few hours and judge its merits with my own eyes?
It should absolutely qualify to be in the debate. That's not in question. The point of content is rather: should it win?
Your whole reasoning for why it shouldn't win is that it doesn't have enough RPG elements so it can't out RPG Fallout...What I'm saying is that's a shit argument, and it has enough RPG elements and it can out RPG Fallout.
 

Harthwain

Magister
Joined
Dec 13, 2019
Messages
5,096
Just because an RPG might have more RPG elements doesn't mean it's better at being a RPG. I might argue that the few RPG elements Baldur's Gate has are executed so well that they surpass Fallout with its many different RPG elements which are all done at a mediocre or even subpar level.
Again - it doesn't just have more RPG elements. They are also better at making it an RPG as a result.

Eh, questioned by you maybe.
The pot calling the kettle black.

Those Codexer's are wrong.
Look outside the Codex then: you will find topics made by people who all agree on that score.

Planescape: Torment's combat is not shit, it's just not engaging or interesting. Thankfully, the combat is super easy and can be done without any difficulty at all, and sometimes it's even kinda fun to steamroll through creeps with big spells. It's not intrusive to your gameplay experience.
ItsChon is wrong.

Compare that to FO on the other hand? Due to the fact that it's turn based, everything is so painfully slow. It takes forever to go through fights and there are a lot of them.
What can I say? I never had problem with that.

What is your issue with how they were handled?
That they are completely irrelevant outside of combat, which is decline even when compared to some other Infinity Engine games.

Third person and first person are both shit is my point.
You're obviously free to have your own opinion, but that's too sweeping a statement for me to agree.

And I agree that a game can be initally buggy but end be patched up and turn out good. I tried to play Arcanum in 2019 though, and I still couldn't get it to work on my computer. Where is this unbroken version of Arcanum so I may finally play it longer than a few hours and judge its merits with my own eyes?
As I said before - I can't help you there, I am no tech-mage. Sounds to me like you have a system-related issue, since everything is fine on my end. But even if you managed to solve technical issue, you'd still find Arcanum to be shit, because its combat is too close to Fallout, and you hate Fallout.

What I'm saying is that's a shit argument, and it has enough RPG elements and it can out RPG Fallout.
I will repeat myself here - you're obviously free to have your own opinion. That said, I consider your argument not only to be shit, but also completely retarded as it loses in this field not only to Fallout, but when compared to other Infinity Engine games as well.
 

The_Iconoclast

Literate
Joined
Apr 5, 2023
Messages
7
And there aren't half-species, these will be phased out.
Surely half-breeds should be bread and butter for SJWs to celebrate and make welcome? Hell, you should even be allowed to identify as a half-orc IRL if you want.
Yhea, but they're probably afraid of marginalized Drow weemenz being colonized by evil blonde surface men. After all, that would be evil internalized racism or something like that...
 

Incendax

Augur
Joined
Jul 4, 2010
Messages
892
even if it makes no sense at all to have them alive in the time frame of the third game.
Minsc should just be an animated statue that thinks he's Minsc. Comes to terms with the fact the real Minsc is dead, but any Minsc that kicks the butt of evil is a true Minsc.

Boom. Now you have an immortal Minsc that can cameo in any game, and even be broken and re-assembled for laughs until the the universe grows cold and dark.
 
Last edited:

Rhobar121

Scholar
Joined
Sep 22, 2022
Messages
1,273
even if it makes no sense at all to have them alive in the time frame of the third game.
Mimic should just be an animated statue that thinks he's Minsc. Comes to terms with the fact the real Minsc is dead, but any Minsc that kicks the butt of evil is a true Minsc.

Boom. Now you have an immortal Minsc that can cameo in any game, and even be broken and re-assembled for laughs until the the universe grows cold and dark.
Everyone knows it's just fan service by WotC.
For some reason, Minsc became popular.
 

Cryomancer

Arcane
Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Jul 11, 2019
Messages
15,786
Location
Frostfell
And that's a good thing.

BG3 improved a lot over DOS2. Only by not having the worst armor system ever invented... BTW, UnderRail has the best armor system in a TB RPG. Instead of a secondary hp bar which forces all CC specialized characters to be DPS, armor has a flat amount and a percentage amount and deflector shields have a energy capacity which is consumed per turn and consumed to deflect damage and deflect in a flat amount based on projectile speed, so, they are far more effective at deflecting an laser gun than a sledgehammer. And even with a amazing armor like Insulated Tungsten Steel Armor and a decent shield, a plasma cannon can still OHK you.

t define "good" and "RPG" first.

Simple.
Good = Anything that is not a souless unimmersive gear farming, low lethality cooldown managing repetitive game that fells more like a chore
RPG = Any shit that identifies itself as an RPG.
 

Gromoer

Educated
Patron
Joined
Jan 26, 2023
Messages
238
Location
Vault 15
Codex+ Now Streaming!
Now when I’m in my late 30s it’s pretty easy to give Minsc‘ character slaps. But back then when I was young and fresh he was fun companion. As I am sure for many of those who‘s eager to criticize him now. Commercializing everything that became popular is a whole another thing though, and Larian absolutely couldn’t resist the temptation. Well, at least it’s not as rapey as with the Vault Boy thing.
 

Mangoose

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Messages
25,727
Location
I'm a Banana
Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity
Now when I’m in my late 30s it’s pretty easy to give Minsc‘ character slaps. But back then when I was young and fresh he was fun companion. As I am sure for many of those who‘s eager to criticize him now. Commercializing everything that became popular is a whole another thing though, and Larian absolutely couldn’t resist the temptation. Well, at least it’s not as rapey as with the Vault Boy thing.
They've been parading Minsc in Neverwinter Online for many years already, alongside Drizzt, while both have new books written about them... It's WotC cross-promoting*. Larian may own, publish, and profit from the game... But they do not own the IP, and both the IP and its owner are a monolith (esp in court).


*Cross-promoting is something I've been seeing lately in general. Essentially make a TV show, a comic, and a game about the same thing and advertise amongst them as well, or provide free game rewards if you buy X comics... At the same time half-ass all of that because consoomers will slurp that up thinking they're getting deals.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom