Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Baldur's Gate Baldur's Gate 3 Early Access Thread [GAME RELEASED, GO TO NEW THREAD]

Kiste

Augur
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
684
How this thread talking about Baldur's gate 3, ended up talking about Jews and BLACKED pornography?

You guys need help.

One of your fellow Vatniks brought up the Jews first, so there's that.
 

AwesomeButton

Proud owner of BG 3: Day of Swen's Tentacle
Patron
Joined
Nov 23, 2014
Messages
17,107
Location
At large
PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015 Make the Codex Great Again! Grab the Codex by the pussy Insert Title Here RPG Wokedex Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. Pathfinder: Wrath
Its not mine. A random posted this link on discord. Maybe someone is using your name to create a fake post to troll resetera? By had an account you mean you still do right? Since someone is posting with your name there.
My account is active. I was still posting from time to time and I went back to be more active just recently (specifically to post about BG3, incidentally).

I'm telling you that this post doesn't exist in my post history. I just checked after seeing the screenshot, to be sure if I wasn't "hacked" or some shit.

Someone is just bullshitting you guys.
Could be an impersonation account. Same name, same portrait. If you haven't been posting in a while, the moderators are probably dumb enough to not notice.
 

Grunker

RPG Codex Ghost
Patron
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
27,765
Location
Copenhagen
You're misrembering or twisting the context - I played it through it yesterday. She gives some bullshit about resurrection not being possible, a clear (and poor) handwave from the writers to explain away the non-possibility of resurrection. You know it's a poor explanation since J states both the passing of time and the stuff Khalid was exposed to (aka writers just slinging everything at the wall).
Jaheira asses too much time has passed (prob by decomposition) and the body is mangled. Both are important factors for raising dead in 2nd edition. A mangled body will be resurrected without its missing parts, and resurrection can only be attempted within a certain amount of days.

View attachment 38718
Resurrection is another option, but lorewise that's extremely difficult and unlikely to do. You need a Priest of at least 14th level and minimum 18 Wisdom according to the rules.

Yeah, so worth maintaining his body and fighting for considering chasing down Irenicus is even more perilous and unlikely, no :M

And that’s if we accept your out-of-game reference as opposed to the facts of what you pay in game.

But don’t sweat it bro, it’s not like it matters
 

Zeriel

Arcane
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
13,967
I'm replaying the bg-series in prep for 3, and one thing that's funny about doing that while reading this thread on the side is how lulzily memeish the majority of bg1's writing is. it changes a lot in 2, but a lot of 1's actual writing besides the main plot is everything from fastest dart thrower in the west to siding with druids on the promise of aloe vera balm rewards

these rare jokes

nigga i just played it this week. calling it rare is like saying it seldom rains in the kingdom of britain. like 30% of the total game text is infused with this

now i don’t really mind it. it has that certain 90s charm. and it “hits” more often than did dos1. but it is what it is

absurd dialogue in BG1 is written in a in-universe tone
:hahano:

Agree to disagree I guess. I've played it countless times over the years, and remember doing so right after people would bitch about this topic, only to find it to be like... 0.1% of dialogues.

Maybe our idea of what is absurd is different though. I don't think an NPC being silly in an in-universe way is out of line, sometimes people IRL are silly too. It really depends on what you mean. For me it'd be stuff like that Elminster line, not Noober harrassing you.

Or are you counting voice lines? Like, yeah, "I AM THE LAW!!!" is clearly a completely out of character reference. At the same time as a teenager I didn't even realize what the reference was until later as someone who never saw the Stallone Judge Dredd. But then you have lines like "CLEAN AS AN ELVEN ARSE", which is ridiculous, sure, but sounds like something a low-class innkeeper would actually say too in-setting.
 

Zeriel

Arcane
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
13,967
You're misrembering or twisting the context - I played it through it yesterday. She gives some bullshit about resurrection not being possible, a clear (and poor) handwave from the writers to explain away the non-possibility of resurrection. You know it's a poor explanation since J states both the passing of time and the stuff Khalid was exposed to (aka writers just slinging everything at the wall).
Jaheira asses too much time has passed (prob by decomposition) and the body is mangled. Both are important factors for raising dead in 2nd edition. A mangled body will be resurrected without its missing parts, and resurrection can only be attempted within a certain amount of days.

View attachment 38718
Resurrection is another option, but lorewise that's extremely difficult and unlikely to do. You need a Priest of at least 14th level and minimum 18 Wisdom according to the rules.

Yeah, so worth maintaining his body and fighting for considering chasing down Irenicus is even more perilous and unlikely, no :M

And that’s if we accept your out-of-game reference as opposed to the facts of what you pay in game.

But don’t sweat it bro, it’s not like it matters


This really seems like nitpicking to me. There are obvious reasons to not have Ressurection apply outside of your party's own gameplay. Like the fact it undermines any impact or meaning of death. If we just assume that people can be Resurrected willy-nilly 50% of the time, then like 90% of the storylines and quests in the game would stop working. You kinda have to handwave this stuff across the board because otherwise it gets very unbelievable. I remember some MMOs actually tried to integrate deathlessness into their storyline and it completely killed the suspension of disbelief and narrative immersion; because a world without death is just so completely different from our own we don't consider it real on even a basic level.
 

Grunker

RPG Codex Ghost
Patron
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
27,765
Location
Copenhagen
You're misrembering or twisting the context - I played it through it yesterday. She gives some bullshit about resurrection not being possible, a clear (and poor) handwave from the writers to explain away the non-possibility of resurrection. You know it's a poor explanation since J states both the passing of time and the stuff Khalid was exposed to (aka writers just slinging everything at the wall).
Jaheira asses too much time has passed (prob by decomposition) and the body is mangled. Both are important factors for raising dead in 2nd edition. A mangled body will be resurrected without its missing parts, and resurrection can only be attempted within a certain amount of days.

View attachment 38718
Resurrection is another option, but lorewise that's extremely difficult and unlikely to do. You need a Priest of at least 14th level and minimum 18 Wisdom according to the rules.

Yeah, so worth maintaining his body and fighting for considering chasing down Irenicus is even more perilous and unlikely, no :M

And that’s if we accept your out-of-game reference as opposed to the facts of what you pay in game.

But don’t sweat it bro, it’s not like it matters


This really seems like nitpicking to me.

Obviously. You’re literally saying this right under the sentence “it’s not like it matters” :M
 

Zeriel

Arcane
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
13,967
You're misrembering or twisting the context - I played it through it yesterday. She gives some bullshit about resurrection not being possible, a clear (and poor) handwave from the writers to explain away the non-possibility of resurrection. You know it's a poor explanation since J states both the passing of time and the stuff Khalid was exposed to (aka writers just slinging everything at the wall).
Jaheira asses too much time has passed (prob by decomposition) and the body is mangled. Both are important factors for raising dead in 2nd edition. A mangled body will be resurrected without its missing parts, and resurrection can only be attempted within a certain amount of days.

View attachment 38718
Resurrection is another option, but lorewise that's extremely difficult and unlikely to do. You need a Priest of at least 14th level and minimum 18 Wisdom according to the rules.

Yeah, so worth maintaining his body and fighting for considering chasing down Irenicus is even more perilous and unlikely, no :M

And that’s if we accept your out-of-game reference as opposed to the facts of what you pay in game.

But don’t sweat it bro, it’s not like it matters


This really seems like nitpicking to me.

Obviously. You’re literally saying this right under the sentence “it’s not like it matters” :M

Sure, but I'm also engaging your argument and providing practical reasons why this was done this way and not just because Bioware is dumb or didn't think it through.
 

Non-Edgy Gamer

Grand Dragon
Patron
Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Nov 6, 2020
Messages
17,656
Strap Yourselves In
You're misrembering or twisting the context - I played it through it yesterday. She gives some bullshit about resurrection not being possible, a clear (and poor) handwave from the writers to explain away the non-possibility of resurrection. You know it's a poor explanation since J states both the passing of time and the stuff Khalid was exposed to (aka writers just slinging everything at the wall).
Jaheira asses too much time has passed (prob by decomposition) and the body is mangled. Both are important factors for raising dead in 2nd edition. A mangled body will be resurrected without its missing parts, and resurrection can only be attempted within a certain amount of days.

Resurrection is another option, but lorewise that's extremely difficult and unlikely to do. You need a Priest of at least 14th level and minimum 18 Wisdom according to the rules.

Yeah, so worth maintaining his body and fighting for considering chasing down Irenicus is even more perilous and unlikely, no :M
Again, Temple of Lothander can cast Resurrect on him. Literally, just drag him along and pay 150 gold a minute after you exit and Irenicus leaves. Not even the first time the PC has had a dead body in his inventory. :M
 

Takamori

Learned
Joined
Apr 17, 2020
Messages
905
The more I think about the free respec, I don't get a good line of thought about it. Seems like they want this game play almost like DoS where by end game you become a really weird amalgamation of spells and skills without much identity.
On Tactician seems like it will have really badly balanced encounters and they will just use the excuse of using free respecs in order to engage with it.
Oh why didnt you respec everyone to be sorcs and twin spell fireballs? hohohohoho
:betrayed:
 

Grunker

RPG Codex Ghost
Patron
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
27,765
Location
Copenhagen
We hating on Tactician as well now? I'm all for bitching it up, Codex-style, but doing difficulty by swapping out monster ammunition, placement etc. seems like pure incline
 

Grunker

RPG Codex Ghost
Patron
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
27,765
Location
Copenhagen
Wait, they fixed reactions? Motherfucker, that must have been my biggest mechanical gripe with the core mechanics. Hallelujah
 

Yosharian

Arcane
Joined
May 28, 2018
Messages
10,442
Location
Grand Chien
More balance stuff courtesy of Reddit, supposedly the Haste spell has been modified to let players perform an additional action, period.

In TT you are only allowed to perform one additional attack with Haste, but with BG3, Fighters for example can perform all their attacks then do it all over again with their Haste bonus action

At level 11 Fighters have 3 attacks so the difference for a Hasted fighter is

TT: 4 attacks
BG3: 6 attacks
 

Takamori

Learned
Joined
Apr 17, 2020
Messages
905
We hating on Tactician as well now? I'm all for bitching it up, Codex-style, but doing difficulty by swapping out monster ammunition, placement etc. seems like pure incline
No this stuff if perfectly fine, guerilla tactics, improved AI , focus targeting casters instead of just trying to hit the 25 AC individual.

My concern is the designer thinking at this stage of the game they can respec into broken shit so I will throw 2 Beholders in your asshole forcing you to be constantly looking for the current broken meta to surpass the encounter instead of following the regular rules and elaborating an encounter hard enough for several flavors of parties.
 

Takamori

Learned
Joined
Apr 17, 2020
Messages
905
More balance stuff courtesy of Reddit, supposedly the Haste spell has been modified to let players perform an additional action, period.

In TT you are only allowed to perform one additional attack with Haste, but with BG3, Fighters for example can perform all their attacks then do it all over again with their Haste bonus action

At level 11 Fighters have 3 attacks so the difference for a Hasted fighter is

TT: 4 attacks
BG3: 6 attacks
With their fucking current iteration of Twinned Spell? :deadtroll:
 

Yosharian

Arcane
Joined
May 28, 2018
Messages
10,442
Location
Grand Chien
More balance stuff courtesy of Reddit, supposedly the Haste spell has been modified to let players perform an additional action, period.

In TT you are only allowed to perform one additional attack with Haste, but with BG3, Fighters for example can perform all their attacks then do it all over again with their Haste bonus action

At level 11 Fighters have 3 attacks so the difference for a Hasted fighter is

TT: 4 attacks
BG3: 6 attacks
With their fucking current iteration of Twinned Spell? :deadtroll:
Ah, I'm not aware - what's different with that?
 
Joined
Jun 6, 2010
Messages
2,386
Location
Milan, Italy
More balance stuff courtesy of Reddit, supposedly the Haste spell has been modified to let players perform an additional action, period.

Yeah, also cast two spells in a round.
But this is not news. It was already that way in EA.
And the problem was already pointed to Larian months ago. They just don't care because they feel this way is more AWESOME.
 

Takamori

Learned
Joined
Apr 17, 2020
Messages
905
Well the classic Twin Spell depending on the spell lets say Fireball you require two distinct targets in other to launch those spells. With the current iteration no need you can twin it no question asked single target gets deleted. The metamagic talent was already strong they just made it good for everything. In theory with this haste you can launch 3 spells at the same time in the same target?

More balance stuff courtesy of Reddit, supposedly the Haste spell has been modified to let players perform an additional action, period.

Yeah, also cast two spells in a round.
But this is not news. It was already that way in EA.
And the problem was already pointed to Larian months ago. They just don't care because they feel this way is more AWESOME.

Reading the forums in Larian is like taking crazy pills.
 
Joined
Oct 9, 2015
Messages
2,095
Location
DFW, Texas
Are Codexers still going on about the bear? I've gone through more than twenty pages of it already and I can't be bothered to read another twenty pages of wannabe Ted Haggards kvetching about their psychosexual hangups. Holy shit, you guys need a better outlet for your unresolved sexual tension. That's the kind of thing General Discussion is for, not the Baldur's Gate 3 thread.
 

Takamori

Learned
Joined
Apr 17, 2020
Messages
905
Are Codexers still going on about the bear? I've gone through more than twenty pages of it already and I can't be bothered to read another twenty pages of wannabe Ted Haggards kvetching about their psychosexual hangups. Holy shit, you guys need a better outlet for your unresolved sexual tension. That's the kind of thing General Discussion is for, not the Baldur's Gate 3 thread.
Well you arrived in the calm before the storm before the Bear fuckers arrive again and start screeching about it and the end of western civilization.
 

Takamori

Learned
Joined
Apr 17, 2020
Messages
905

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom